대한치과교정학회지 (The korean journal of orthodontics)

  • 제36권4호
  • /
  • Pages.295-307
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 2234-7518(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-372X(eISSN)
대한치과교정학회 (The Korean Association Of Orthodontists)
권호 표지

Self drilling과 Self-tapping microscrew implants의 조직학적 및 생역학적인 비교

Histologic and biomechanical characteristics of orthodontic self-drilling and self-tapping microscrew implants

  • Park, Hyo-Sang (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Yen, Shue (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jeoung, Seong-Hwa (Department of Biostatistics and Preventive Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
  • 발행 : 2006.08.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 교정용 고정원으로 사용된 self-drilling과 self-tapping microscrew implants를 조직학적 및 생역적으로 비교하는 것이다. 28 마리의 가토에 112개의 microscrew implants (56개의 self-drilling microscrew implants 와 56개의 self-tapping microscrew implants)를 식립하였다. Self-tapping microscrew implants는 0.9 mm 드릴로서 홈을 형성한 후 식립하였고 self-drilling microscrew implants는 홈을 형성하지 않고 바로 식립하였다. 교정력은 식립 직후 바로 NiTi coil spring을 연결하여 가하였으며 일부는 교정력을 가하지 않았고 일부는 100 gm정도의 약한 교정력을 일부는 200 gm정도의 강한 교정력을 가하였다. 실험동물은 3주 혹은 5주에 희생하였으며 72개의 비탈회 표본을 만들어 전반적인 조직학적 관찰과 조직 계측을 시행하였다. 토크 게이지로 최대 식립 토크와 최대 제거 토크를 측정하였다. 모든 microscrew implants는 실험기간 동안 안정되게 유지되었고 최대 제거 토크의 측정에는 self-drilling과 self-tapping microscrew implants 사이에 통계학적으로 유이한 차이가 없었다. 조직 관찰에서 self-tapping microscrew implants에서 골 임프란트 계면에 골결손이 더 많았고 5주에서는 새로이 형성된 미성숙 골이 더 많았다. Self-drilling microscrew implants에서 골표면 혹은 골내막으로의 골 형성이 많이 관찰되었으나 5주에서는 흡수되는 양상을 보였다. 3주에서는 self-drilling microscrew implants가 더 많은 골접촉을 보였으나 5주에서는 두 군사이에 차이가 관찰되지 않았다. 이 결과는 두 방법이 모두 microscrew implant의 식립에 사용될 수 있음을 시사하나 self-tapping microscrew implants의 경우 초기에는 약한 힘을 가하는 것이 좋을 것으로 생각된다.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the histological and biomechanical characteristics of self-tapping and self-drilling microscrew implants. Methods: 112 microscrew implants (56 self-drilling and 56 self-tapping) were placed into the tibia of 28 rabbits. The implants were loaded immediately with no force, light (100 gm), or heavy force (200 gm) with nickel-titanium coil springs. The animals were sacrificed at 3- and 5-weeks after placement and histologic and histomorphometric analysis were performed under a microscope. Results: All microscrew implants stayed firm throughout the experiment. There was no significant difference between self-drilling and self-tapping microscrew implants both in peak insertion and removal torques. Histologic examinations showed there were more defects in the self-tapping than the self-drilling microscrew implants, and newly formed immature bone was increased at the interface in the self-tapping 5-week group. There was proliferation of bone towards the outer surface of the implant and/or toward the marrow space in the self-drilling group. Histologically, self-drilling microscrew implants provided more bone contact initially but the two methods became similar at 5 weeks. Conclusion: These results indicate the two methods can be used for microscrew implant placement, but when using self-tapping microscrew implants, it seems better to use light force in the early stages.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Shapiro PA, Kokich VG. Uses of implants in orthodontics. Dent Clin North Am 1988;32:539-50
  2. Roberts WE, Nelson CL, Goodacre CJ. Rigid implant anchorage to close a mandibular first molar extraction site. J Clin Orthod 1994;28:693-704
  3. Creekmore TD, Eklund MK. The possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod 1983;17:266-9
  4. Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod 1997;31:763-7
  5. Park HS. The skeletal cortical anchorage using titanium microscrew implants. Korean J Orthod 1999;29:699-706
  6. Park HS. The use of Micro-implant as orthodontic anchorage. Seoul, Korea: Nare Publication; 2001. p. 5-124
  7. Park HS, Bae SM, Kyung HM, Sung JH. Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of Skeletal Class I bialveolar protrusion. J Clin Orthod 2001;35:417-22
  8. Park, HS, Kwon TG, Sung JH. Nonextraction treatment with Microscrew implant. Angle Orthod 2004;74:539-49
  9. Lee JS, Kim DH, Park YC, Kyung SH, Kim TK. The efficient use of midpalatal miniscrew implants. Angle Orthod 2004;74:711-4
  10. Chung K, Kim SH, Kook Y. C-orthodontic microimplant for distalization of mandibular dentition in Class III correction. Angle Orthod 2005;75:119-28
  11. Sowden D, Schmitz JP. AO self-drilling and self-tapping screws in rat calvarial bone: an ultrastructural study of the implant interface. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:294-9 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.30585
  12. Heidemann W, Gerlach KL, Grobel KH, Kollner HG. Drill free screws: a new form of osteosynthesis screw. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1998;26: 163-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(98)80007-3
  13. Heidemann W, Gerlach KL. Clinical applications of drill free screws in maxillofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1999;27:252-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(99)80037-7
  14. Heidemann W, Terheyden H, Gerlach KL. Analysis of the osseous/metal interface of drill free screws and self tapping screws. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001;29:69-74 https://doi.org/10.1054/jcms.2000.0179
  15. Kerawala CJ, Martin IC, Allan W, Williams ED. The effects of operator technique and bur design on temperature during osseous preparation for osteosynthesis self-tapping screws. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;88:145-50 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70108-3
  16. O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Influence of implant taper on the primary and secondary stability of osseointegrated titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:474-80 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01041.x
  17. Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7: 62-71
  18. Phillips JH, Rahn BA. Comparison of compression and torque measurements of self-tapping and pre-tapped screws. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;83:447-58 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198903000-00007
  19. Trisi P, Rebaudi A. Progressive bone adaptation of titanium implants during and after orthodontic load in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002;22:31-43
  20. Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod 1984;86:95-111 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90301-4
  21. Frost HM. Mathematical elements of bone remodeling. Springfield, IL: CC Thomas; 1964
  22. Hitchon PW, Brenton MD, Coppes JK, From AM, Torner JC. Factors affecting the pullout strength of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws. Spine 2003;28:9-13 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200301010-00004
  23. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Influence of initial implant mobility on the integration of titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:120-7 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070205.x
  24. Schulten AJ, Zimmermann CE, Glowacki J. Osteoclastic bone resorption around intraosseous screws in rat and pig mandibles. Microsc Res Tech 2003;61:533-9 https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.10376
  25. Park HS, Jeoung SH, Kwon OH. Factors affecting the clinical success of mini- or microscrew implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:18-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.032
  26. Kim JW, Chang YI. Effects of drilling process in stability of micro-implants used for the orthodontic anchorage. Korean J Orthod 2002;32:107-15
  27. Lohr J, Gellrich NC, Buscher P, Wahl D, Rahn BA. Comparative in vitro studies of self-boring and self-tapping screws. Histomorphological and physical-technical studies of bone layers. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2000;4:159-63 https://doi.org/10.1007/s100060050189
  28. Eriksson A, Albrektsson T, Grane B, McQueen D. Thermal injury to bone. A vital-microscopic description of heat effects. Int J Oral Surg 1982;11:115-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(82)80020-3
  29. Eriksson RA, Adell R. Temperatures during drilling for the placement of implants using the osseointegration technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;44:4-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(86)90006-6
  30. Yacker MJ, Klein M. The effects of irrigation on osteotomy depth and bur diameter. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:634-8
  31. Brisman DL. The effects of speed, pressure, and time on bone temperature during the drilling of implant sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:35-7
  32. Oktenoglu BT, Ferrara LA, Andalkar N, Ozer AF, Sarioglu AC, Benzel EC. Effects of hole preparation on screw pullout resistance and insertional torque: a biomechanical study. J Neurosurg 2001;94:91-6
  33. Frost HM. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians. Angle Orthod 2004;74:3-15