Posteroanterior cephalometric study of frontal ramal inclination in chin-deviated individuals

이부편위자의 하악골상행지 경사에 관한 정모두부방사선학적 연구

  • Eun, Chun-Sun (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National Univeristy) ;
  • Hwang, Hyeon-Shik (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Chonnam National University)
  • 은춘선 (전남대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 황현식 (전남대학교 치의학연구소, 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Published : 2006.10.30

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the right and left differences of frontal ramal inclination in chin-deviated individuals. Methods: Thirty adult patients with clinically apparent chin deviation were selected as the chin-deviated group, and 30 adult patients with symmetric faces were selected as the control group. On the posteroanterior cephalograms, the frontal ramal inclination was measured, and the right and left differences were compared and analyzed. Results: While the control group did not show right and left differences of frontal ramal inclinations, the chin-deviated individuals showed right and left differences of frontal ramal inclination. In chin-deviated individuals, the frontal ramal inclinations of the non-deviated side were statistically greater than those of the deviated side. The right and left differences of frontal ramal inclinations, with menton deviation and the right and left differences of maxillary heights showed statistically significant correlation. Conclusion: We conclude that the frontal ramal inclinations should be considered in the diagnosis of facial asymmetry.

본 연구는 이부편위자의 정모두부방사선사진에서 하악골상행지 경사도의 좌우 차이를 알아봄으로써 교정환자의 임상검사 시 비대칭 진단에 도움이 되고자 시행되었다. 뚜렷한 이부편위를 보이는 성인 30명을 이부편위군으로, 좌우 대칭적인 외모를 보이는 성인 30명을 대조군으로 선정하여 정모두부방사선사진을 촬영한 후 하악골상행지 경사도를 측정하고 좌우 차이를 산출, 비교 분석한 결과, 대조군의 경우 좌우 차이를 보이지 않은 반면 이부편위자에서는 하악골상행지 경사도의 좌우 차이를 보였다. 이부편위자에서 비편위측의 하악골상행지의 경사도는 편위측에 비해 통계적으로 유의하게 큰 것으로 나타났으며, 하악골상행지 경사도의 좌우차이는 이부편위 정도 및 상악고경의 좌우차이와 통계적으로 유의한 순상관관계를 보였다. 이부편위자에서 하악골상행지 경사도의 좌우차이를 규명한 본 연구 결과는 안면비대칭 환자의 진단 시 하악골상행지 경사도에 대한 분석이 필요함을 시사하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Peck H, Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 1970;40:284-318
  2. Adams R. A Treatise on rheumatic gout or chronic rheumatic arthritis of all the joints. 2nd Ed. London: Churchill; 1873. p. 237
  3. Vig PS, Hewitt AB. Asymmetry of the human facial skeleton. Angle Orthod 1975;45:125-9
  4. Shah SM, Joshi MR. An assessment of asymmetry in the normal craniofacial complex. Angle Orthod 1978;48:141-8
  5. Grayson BH, McCarthy JG, Bookstein F. Analysis of craniofacial asymmetry by multiplane cephalometry. Am J Orthod 1983;84:217-24 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(83)90129-X
  6. Ahn JS, Lee KH, Hwang HS. A study on the 3-D standard value of mandible for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. Korean J Orthod 2005;35:91-105
  7. Hwang HS. Maxillofacial 3-D image analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. J Kor Dent Assoc 2004;42:76-83
  8. Kim EH, Hwang HS. The validity of head posture aligner in posteroanterior cephalometry. Korean J Orthod 2000;30:543-52
  9. Simon PW. Fundamental principles of a systematic diagnosis of dental anomalies. Boston: Stratford; 1922. p. 54
  10. Letzer GM, Kronman JH. A posteroanterior cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial asymmetry. Angle Orthod 1967;37:205-11
  11. Grummons DC, Kappeyne van de Coppello MA. A frontal asymmetry analysis. J Clin Orthod 1987;21:448-65
  12. Hwang HS, Lee KH, Park JY, Kang BC, Park JW, Lee JS. Development of posteroanterior cephalometric analysis for the diagnosis of facial asymmetry. J Kor Dent Assoc 2004;42:219-31
  13. Youn IS, Lee KH, Hwang HS. Classification of facial asymmetry by cluster analysis. J Kor Dent Assoc 2001;39:765-73
  14. Coben SE. The integration of facial skeletal variants: A serial cephalometric roentgenographic analysis of craniofacial form and growth. Am J Orthod 1955;41:407-34 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(55)90153-6
  15. Pinto AS, Buschang PH, Throckmorton GS, Chen P. Morphological and positional asymmetries of young children with functional unilateral posterior crossbite. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:513-20 https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.118627a
  16. Worms FW, Speidel TM, Bevis RR, Waite DE. Posttreatment stability and esthetics of orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod 1980;50:251-73
  17. Ellis E 3rd. Condylar positioning devices for orthognathic surgery: are they necessary? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1994;52:536-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(94)90085-X
  18. Helm G, Stepke MT. Maintenance of the preoperative condyle position in orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1997;25:34-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(97)80022-4