CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNING IMPROVEMENT OF EMERGENCY EVASION PERFORMANCE

  • Nozaki, H. (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Kinki University)
  • Published : 2006.04.01

Abstract

When emergency evasion during running is required, a driver sometimes causes a vehicle to drift, that is, a condition in which the rear wheels skid due to rapid steering. Under such conditions, the vehicle enters a very unstable state and often becomes uncontrollable. An unstable state of the vehicle induced by rapid steering was simulated and the effect of differential steering assistance was examined. Results indicate that, in emergency evasion while cornering and during which the vehicle begins to drift, unstable behavior like spins can be avoided by differential steering assistance and both the stability and control of the vehicle is improved remarkably. In addition, reduction of overshoot during spin evasion by the differential steering assistance has been shown to enable the vehicle to return to a state of stability in a short time in emergency evasion during straight-line running. Moreover, the effectiveness of differential steering assistance during emergency evasion was confirmed using a driving simulator.

Keywords

References

  1. Hirao, O. (1969). On the steering system which has a derivative term for the improvement of the stability of anthro-mobile. J. Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan 23, 1, 48-54 (in Japanese)
  2. Hirao, O. and Yamada, N. (1966). Improved dynamic characteristic of automobile steering system. - case of an automobile driven by a man -. J. Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan 20, 11, 995-1002 (in Japanese)
  3. Miyamori, A. and Nakaya, H. (1997). The Optimum differential terms for lateral motion control performance on the vehicle. Proc. Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan, Annual Cong., 974, 101-104 (in Japanese)
  4. Nakaya, H. (1994). Lateral motion control performance of a vehicle with differential terms. Proc. Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan, Annual Cong., 944, 133-136 (in Japanese)
  5. Watanabe, Y. and Sayers, M. W. (2002). Extending vehicle dynamics software for analysis, design, control, and real-time testing. Proc. AVEC'02, 20024545, 407-412
  6. MacAdam, C. C. (1980). An optimal preview control for linear systems. J. Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, ASME, 102, 3 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3140620
  7. MacAdam, C. C. (1981). Application of an optimal preview control for simulation of closed-loop automobile driving. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 11