COMBINED EFFECTS OF BD20, LOW SULFUR DIESEL FUEL AND DIESEL OXIDATION CATALYST IN A HD DIESEL ENGINE

  • Baik, D.S. (School of Mechanical Engineering, Korea University of Technology and Education)
  • Published : 2006.10.01

Abstract

The enormous increase in the use of fossil energy sources throughout the world has caused severe air pollution and a depletion of energy. Besides, it seems very difficult to comply with the upcoming stringent emission standards in vehicles. In order to develop low emission engines, research on better qualified fuels as alternative fuels to secure high engine performance becomes a more important issue than ever. Since sulfur contained in diesel fuel is transformed in sulfate-laden particulate matters when a catalyst is applied, it is necessary to provide low sulfur fuels before any Pt-based oxidation catalysts are applied. But the excessive reduction of sulfur levels may cause the lubricity of fuel and engine performance to degrade. In this aspect, biodiesel fuel derived from rice bran is applied to compensate viscosity lost in the desulfurization treatment. This research is focused on the performance of an 11,000cc diesel engine and the emission characteristics by the introduction of ULSD(Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel), BD20(Diesel 80%+Biodiesel 20%) and a diesel oxidation catalyst, where BD20 is used to improve the lubricity of fuel in fuel injection systems as fuel additives or alternative fuels.

Keywords

References

  1. Allansson, R., Maloney, C. A., Walker, A. P, and Warren, J. P (2000). Sulphate production over the CRT: what fuel sulphate level is required to enable the EU4 and EU 5 PM standards to be met. SAE Paper No. 2001-01-1875
  2. Choi, S. H. and Oh, Y. T. (2006). Combustion characteristics of esterified rice bran oil as an alternative fuel in a diesel engine. Int. J. Automotive Technology 7, 4, 399-406
  3. Daniels, T. L., McCormick, R. L., Graboski, M. S., Carlson, P N., Rao, V., and Rice, G W. (1996). The effect of diesel sulfur content and oxidation catalysts on transient emissions at high altitude from 1995 Detroit diesel series 50 urban bus engine. SAE Paper No. 961974
  4. Frank, B. P., Tang, S., and Lanni, T. (2004). A study of the effects of fuel type and emission control systems on regulated gaseous emissions from heavy-duty diesel engines. SAE Paper No. 2004-01-1085
  5. Khair, M. and McKinnon, D. L. (1999). Performance evaluation of emission control technologies for diesel heavy-duty engines. SAE Paper No. 1999-01-3564
  6. Lee, H. S. and Chun, K. M. (2006). Investigation of soot oxidation characteristics in a simulated diesel particulate filter. Int. J. Automotive Technology 7, 3, 261-267
  7. Masatoshi, M. and Tomoaki, H. T. (1997). Study on lubricity of low sulfur diesel fuels. SAE Paper No. 972895
  8. Nikanjam, M. and Henderson, P. T. (1993). Lubricity of low sulfur diesel fuel. SAE Paper No. 932740
  9. Olaf, S., Jurgen, K. and Axel, M. (1999). Environmental and health effects caused by the use of biodiesel. SAE Paper No. 1999-01-3561
  10. Oh, S. G, Baik, D. S. and Han, Y. C. (2003). Emission characteristics in ultra low sulfur diesel. Int. J. Automotive Technology 4, 2, 95-100
  11. Oyama, K. and Kakegawa, T. (2003). Evaluation of desel exhaust emission of avanced emission control technologies using various diesel fuels, and sulfur effect on performance after mileage accumulation. SAE Paper No. 2003-01-1907
  12. Sharp, C. A. and Howell, S. A. (2000). The effect ofbiodiesel fuels on transient emissions from modem diesel engines, partly regulated emissons and performance. SAE Paper No. 2000-01-1967
  13. Vincent, M. W. and Richards, P. J. (2000). The long distance road trial of combined diesel particulate filter and additive. SAE Paper No. 2000-01-2849