Journal of the Korea Safety Management & Science (대한안전경영과학회지)

Korea Safety Management & Science (대한안전경영과학회)
권호 표지

On the Optimal Decision Making in the Compensatory Models

보정모형에서의 최적 의사결정에 관한 연구

  • 정순석 (충주대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Published : 2006.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision making is deducing the relative importance in the criterion of decision making and each alternative which is able to making a variety of choices measures the preferred degree in the series of town ranking criterions. Moreover, this is possible by synthesizing them systematically. In general, a fundamental problem decision maker solve for multi-criteria decision making is evaluating a set of activities which an considered as the target logically, and this kind of work is evaluated and synthesized by various criterions of the value which a chain of activities usually hold in common. In this paper, we use the compensatory models for the optimal decision making. For the purpose of optimal decision making, the data of five different car models are used in Europe.

Keywords

References

  1. 정순석, "엔트로피 방법에 의한 다 요소 의사결정에 관한연구", 대한안전경영과 학회지 제6권 제21호, 2004, pp.177-186
  2. 이강인, "선호 종속으로 허용하는 다속성 의사결정문제의 대화형 근방법의 개발", 동국대학교 대학원 산업공학과, 박사학위 논문, 1996
  3. Ashton, R. H, Sensitivity of Multi-attribute Decision Models to Alternative Specifications of Weighting Parameters, Journal of Business Research, Vol.8, No.3, 1980, pp.341-359 https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(80)90041-7
  4. Bana e Costa, C. A.(Eds), Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid, Springer-Verlag, New york, 1990
  5. Barron, F, H., and Barrett, B. E. , Decision Quality Using Ranked Attribute Weights, Management Science, Vol. 42, No.11, 1996, pp. 1515-1523 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.11.1515
  6. Ball, D. E., Keeney, R. L., and Raiffa, H., Confliction Objective in Decisions, John Wiley & Sons, 1997
  7. Borcherding, K., Eppel. T. and Von Winterfeldt, D, Comparison of Weighting Judgements in Multiattribute Utilty Measurement. Management Science, Vol. 37. No. 12, 1991, pp. 1603-1619 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.12.1603
  8. Canada, J. R., and Sullivan, W. G, Economic and Multiattribute Evaluation of Advanced Manufacturing systems. Prentice Hall, N. J. , 1989
  9. Cogger, K. O., and Yu. P. L., Eigenweight Vectors and Least-Distance Approximation for Revealed Preference in Pairwise weight Ratios, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applixatons, Vol. 46, No. 4, ,1985, pp. 483-491 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00939153
  10. Goicoechea, A., Hansen, D. R., and Duckstein, L., Multiobjective decision Analysis with Engineering and Business Applications, John Wiley & Sons, 1982
  11. Hobbs, B. F. A Comparison of Weighting Methods in Power Plant Siting, Decision Sciences, Vol. 11, No.4, ,1982 ,pp. 725-737 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1980.tb01173.x
  12. Hwang, C. L., and Yoon. K., Multiple Attribute Decision Making ethods and Applicatons : A state-of-The-Art Survey, New York : Springer-Verlag, 1981
  13. Olson, D. L., Decision Aids for Selecton Problems, New York : pringer -Berlag, , 1996
  14. Saaty, T. L, A scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 3, 1997, pp. 234-281 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
  15. Schoemaker, P. J. H., and Waid, C. C., An Experimental Comparison of Different Approaches to Determining Weights in Additive Utility Models, Management Science, Vol. 28, No. 2, , 1982, pp. 182-196 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.28.2.182
  16. Soofi, E. S., Generalized Entropy-based Weight for Multiattribute Models, Operations Research, 32(2), 1990, pp. 182-196
  17. Steuer, R. E., Multiple Criteria Optimization : Theory, Computation, and Application, John Wiley & Sons, 1986
  18. Weber, M., and Borcherding, K., Behavioral Influences on Weight Judgements in Multi Attribute Decision Making, European Journal of Operational Research, 67. 1993, pp. 1-12 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)90318-H
  19. Zeleny, M, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, New York : McGrow-Hill, 1982