A Study on Integrated Quality Evaluation Model of Information System

정보시스템 종합품질평가 모형 연구

  • 서장훈 (한국능률협회 생산성 위원회) ;
  • 이기준 (한국교육개발원 교육통계정보센터) ;
  • 박명규 (명지대 산업공학과)
  • Published : 2006.08.30

Abstract

One of The standard issue in riding on the wave of the information system(IS) is records of performance, grow unprecedently fast, and has highly uncertain future. Within the framework of IS Evaluation, The main purpose of this study is to suggest performance quality evaluation system as follows, The Integrated Quality Evaluation Model Design(IQEMD) of Information System helps corporations to improve productivity, customer service and corporate competitive power. To respond flexibly this trend, we have to realize that the information system has to keep the most effective optimal information network at the proper time. The existing evaluation method has been concentrated on the evaluation of a degree of the information system maturity focused on static viewpoints. The evaluation of potential factors to affect the future-oriented performance, that can analyze both unit business being able to apply an information system base was used efficiently well and what performance evaluation item was obtained actually, was insufficient relatively. In this paper, An integrated quality evaluation method will analyze a degree of information system maturity in dynamic evaluation viewpoints rather than in static evaluation viewpoints. finally we estimated the relative degree of importance of each determinant using the AHP methodology The validity of the proposed model was also partially proved using two different methods, holistic and historical approach.

Keywords

References

  1. 김인주, "정보화 수준 성숙모델 기반의 통합 평가시스템 개발", 연세대 박사학위 논문, 1999
  2. 송관의, "정보화 수준평가 관점의 정보시스템 성장단계에 관한 연구", 연세대학교 석사학위 논문, 2002
  3. 임춘성외, 2001 기업정보화 수준평가 결과보고서, 기업정보화지원센터, 2002
  4. 김효근, 서지현, 서현주, "IT환경자원이 IT성과와 지속적인 경쟁우위에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구", 경영정보학연구, 제10권 제1호, 2000년
  5. 이석재외 4, "정보화수준 평가 모형에 관한 연구", 한국전산원, 1999. 12
  6. Barry L Myers, Leon A Kappelman, Victor R Prybutok, A Comprehensive Model for Assessing the Quality and Productivity of the Information systems Function Toward a Contingency Theory for Information Systems Assessment, Information Resource Management Journal, Winter 1997
  7. Dhillon, G, Lee, J., "Value Assessment of IS/IT Service Provision within Organization", Proceedings of the twenty first international conference on Information systems, International Conference on Information System, 2000, pp. 647-651
  8. Gartner Group, Evaluating the Maturity of an IT Asset Management Program, November 2001
  9. Huff, S. L., Munro, M. C., Martin, B. H., Growth stages of end-user computing, Communications of the ACM, 31(5), pp.542-550 https://doi.org/10.1145/42411.42417
  10. Leem, C-S(2000), '00 Annual reports for evaluation of IS Performance, IT Research and consulting. Leem, C. and Kim, I. et al Introduction to an integrated methodology for development and implementation of enterprise information systems, Informs & Korms, 2000
  11. Mutsaers, E. J., van der Zee, H., Giertz, H., The Evolution of Information Technology, Nolan Norton & Co., Utrecht, 1997
  12. Richard L. Nolan, "Managing the Crises in Data Processing," Harvard Business Review, 57(2), March-April, 1979, pp. 115-26
  13. Seddon, P. B.(1997), A Respecification and Extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS Sucess, Information Systems Research, Vol.8, No.3, pp.240-253 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.3.240
  14. Timo Saarinen, An Expanded Instrument for Evaluating Information System Success, Information & Management, No.31, 1996
  15. Yang W. Lee, Diane M. Strong, Richard Y. Wang and Leo L. Pipino (1998),  Manage your information as a product, Sloan Management Review, pp. 95-105