Visual Preference in Green Roof Sites

옥상 녹화지의 시각적 선호도

  • Published : 2006.12.31

Abstract

Roof greening in a city can contributes to not only providing network opportunities for dispersed greenspace patches but also bringing more greenspaces into a city. In addition, it can help to flooding and microclimate control in the city. Recently, a number of roof greening projects have been introduced, mainly to public buildings and schools. Roof peening need to offers both ecological functions and convenience and satisfaction for urban residents. This study aims to provide directions for improving ecological benefits and visual preference of roof greening. Twelve scene slides were adopted to measure people's visual preference. The survey results show that landscape images can be categorized into naturalness, visual diversity, uniqueness, and spatial flexibility. Physical scenes can be classified into type I mostly greened by plants, type II mixed between convenience facilities and plants, and type III constructed with pond. People show high preferences to type I and type II when visual diversity is high. The results of this study suggest to enhance the visual preference by considering visual diversity when applying the ecological design methods to improve naturalness for roof greening.

Keywords

References

  1. 김광래, 허준, 노재현(1993) 녹지공간의 자연성과 선호성 분석에 관한 연구. 한국조경학회지 20(4): 26-38
  2. 김귀곤, 조동길, 차영두, 황기현(2000) 생태공원조성을 위한 식재설계방법의 개발-시각적 선호도와 생태적 다양성의 상호 관련성을 중심으로. 한국조경학회지 27(5): 12-24
  3. 김대현, 임승빈(1989) 자연적 경관요소가 주거가로경관의 시각적 선호에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 농학연구 14(1): 87
  4. 서울특별시(2000) 건물옥상 녹화 학술용역
  5. 서울특별시(2001) 2001년 초록뜰 모니터링 결과보고서
  6. 서울특별시(2003) 건축물 옥상 녹화 구조진단 및 모니터링에 따른관리.조성방안
  7. 서울특별시(2004) 건축물 옥상 녹화 시스템 유형결정과 관리 매뉴얼
  8. 오택섭(1990) 사회과학 데이터 분석법. 서울: 나남
  9. 임승빈(1991) 경관분석론. 서울: 서울대학교 출판부
  10. 채서일(1995) 사회과학조사방법론 서울: 학현사
  11. Beatley, T.(2000) Green Urbanism: Learning from Euro- pean Cities. Washington, D.C.: Island Press
  12. Gimblett. H. R.. R. M. Itami, and J. E. Fitzgibbon(1985) Mystery in an information processing model of landscape preference. Landscape Journal 4(2): 87-95 https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.4.2.87
  13. Hands. D. E. and R. D. Brown(2001) Enhancing visual preference of ecological rehabilitation sites. Landscape and Urban Planning 58: 57-70
  14. Parsons. R. (1994) Conflict between ecological sustainability and environmental aesthetics: conundrum canard or curiosity, Landscape and Urban Planning 32: 227-244 https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(95)07004-E
  15. Purcell, A. T. and R. J. Lamb(1998) Preference and naturalness: an ecological approach. Landscape and Urban Planning 42: 57-66 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00073-5
  16. Steinitz. C.(1990) Toward a sustainable landscape with high visual preference and high ecological integrity: the loop road in Acadia National Park. USA Landscape and Urban Planning 19(3): 213-250 https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(90)90023-U
  17. (材)都市緑化技術開後機構(1996) Neo-Green Space Design 2
  18. (材)都市緑化技術開後機構 (1999) Neo-Green Space Design 3