Complete Fracture of Totally Implantable Venous Catheter

완전 거치형 정맥도관의 완전 절단

  • Kim, Jung-Tae (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Chang, Woon-Ha (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Tae-Yoon (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 김정태 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 흉부외과) ;
  • 장운하 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 흉부외과) ;
  • 오태윤 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 흉부외과)
  • Published : 2006.12.05

Abstract

The patient was a 42-year-old female with breast cancer who had an implantable central venous catheter inserted percutaneously into left subclavian vein for chemotherapy. The postinsertion chest x ray revealed that there was no compressive sigh of catheter. Three months after insertion of the catheter, the patient was admitted to the hospital for 4th chemotherapy. The port was accessed but blood could not be aspirated and the catheter could not be flushed. A chest x ray revealed that the catheter was completely transected at the point where the catheter passed under the clavicle. Percutaneous removal of the distal fragment of the catheter was accomplished. The patient was discharged after successful removal of fragment of catheter.

42세 여자 환자로 유방암으로 인한 항암치료를 위해 왼쪽 쇄골하정맥으로 완전 거치형 정맥도관(totally implantable venous catheter)을 삽입하였다. 삽입 직후 단순 흉부 방사선 사진상 도관에는 특이 소견이 없었다. 환자는 3개월 후 4번째 항암치료를 위해 입원하였으나 도관을 통해 피가 역류되지도 않고 주입되지도 않았다. 단순 흉부 방사선 사진상 도관이 쇄골 밑을 지나는 부위에서 완전 절단되어 있었다. 경피적 방법으로 도관의 원위부위를 성공적으로 제거한 후 환자는 퇴원하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Koch HJ, Pietsch M, Krause U, Wilke H, Eigler FW. Implantable vascular access systems: experience in 1,500 paients with totally implanted central venous port systems. World J Surg 1998;22:12-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002689900342
  2. Aiken DR, Catalano R, Minton JP. Cental vein access in oncology patients: the 'peel-away' sheath for rapid insertion. J Surg Oncol 1983;22:81-3 https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.2930220204
  3. Aiken DR, Minton JP. The 'pinch-off sign': a warning of impending problems with permanent subclavian catheters. Am J Surg 1984;148:633-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(84)90340-4
  4. Koonings PP, Given FT. Long-term experience with a totally implanted catheter system in gynecologic oncologic patients. J Am Coll Surg 1994;178:164-6
  5. Hinke DH, Zandt-Stastny DA, Goodman LR, et al. Pinch-off syndrome: a complication of implantable subclavian venous access devices. Radiology 1990;177:353-6 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.177.2.2217768
  6. Han SH, Shin SJ, Hahn JS. A case of pinch-off syndrome misdiagnosed by catheter related venous thrombosis. Korean J Thromb Hemost 2002;9:47-51
  7. Klotz HP, Schopke W, Kohler A, et al. Catheter fracture: a rare complication of totally implantable subclavian venous access devices. J Surg Oncol 1996;62:222-5 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9098(199607)62:3<222::AID-JSO14>3.0.CO;2-8
  8. Di Carlo I, Cordio S, La Greca G, et al. Totally implantable venous access devices implanted surgically: a retrospective study on early and late complications. Arch Surg 2001;136: 1050-3 https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.136.9.1050