유럽 생태마을의 커뮤니티 정원과 공유공간의 경관적 특징

Eco-symbolic Landscape Characteristics in Community Gardens and Common Spaces of Eco-Villages in Europe

  • 김근호 (전남대학교 바이오하우징연구사업단) ;
  • 조동범 (전남대학교 산림자원조경학부) ;
  • 김미향 (전남대학교 산림자원조경학부 대학원)
  • 발행 : 2006.10.25

초록

Although we have seen recently increasing number of eco-villages, any eco-village is not registered in Global Eco-village Network. It is important to review the definition of eco-villages and to provide useful basic information for future eco-villages. The main research aim is to analyze landscape characteristics of community garden and common spaces and to identify ecological symbolism of landscape created by residents in eco-villages. Seven eco-villages in Germany, Denmark and UK were selected and the following aspects were investigated through field survey; the settlement background, social and economical aspect, architectural specifications, recycled energy, and landscape characteristics of external spaces in eco-villages. The result indicated that the landscape of eco-village did intend neither to return to primitive society nor to control nature by technology. It intended to coexistence with nature. Primitive nature is symbolically restored and people who have it in mind strongly intend to grow together this common sense. Landscape creation has important role in creating common relationship between human living and nature. When we regard it conceptually as the eco-symbolism in landscape design of community garden, it presented the meaningful relationship with landscape and human life. It is not expression of landscape materiality and designed form but sense of place and landscape image. Landscape design would be expected to reveal the life stage and cycle from designed physical form and materiality through as time goes by when it is part of environmental circulation process by means of human living as meaningful relationship.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bio-City編輯部(1997), 大空から大地へ;ゲルノートミンヶのエコロジカルな粘土建築. BIO CITY No. 12, pp. 33-41
  2. Findhorn Foundation (2004), The Findhorn Foundation & Community Visitor Guide
  3. Goudie, A.(2000), The Human Impact on the Natural Environment. Blackwell: Oxford
  4. Joubert, K. (2005), Sieben Linden; Treading Softly on the Earth.(홍보자료 CD)
  5. Lawton, R.(1989), The Rise and Fall of Great Cities. Belhaven: London
  6. Peters, V. and Stengel. M. (2005), Eurotopia; International Communities and Ecovillages in Europe. Eurotopia-directory
  7. Pivo, G.(1996), Toward sustainable urbanization on mainstreet Cascadia. Cities 13(5), pp.339-354 https://doi.org/10.1016/0264-2751(96)00021-2
  8. Rabinovitch, J.(1998), Global, Regional and Local Perspectives Towards Sustainable Urban and Rural Development. In E. Fernandes, ed., Environmental Strategies for Sustainable Development in Urban Areas: Lessons from Africa and Latin America. Alershot: Ashgate. pp.16-44
  9. White, R. R.(1994), Urban Environmental Management. John Wiley & Sons: Chichester
  10. World Bank.(1992), World Development Report 1992. Oxford University Presss: Oxford.
  11. 宮城俊作(2001), ランドスケ-ブデザインの視座. 學藝出版社
  12. 吉村元男(1998), エコハビタ-環境創造の都市. 學藝出版社 , pp.46-54
  13. 김귀곤(2002), 한국형 생태마을의 모형개발 연구. 생태마을과 퍼머컬쳐에 관한 국제 심포지움 및 디자인 워크샵: pp.111-143
  14. 김귀순(2003), 세계의 생태마을을 찾아서. 도서출판누리에
  15. 岩田明子(1999), 住民がつくる綠の村; Galgebakken-a green village created by its residents. LANDSCPE DESIGN No. 15, pp.44-49
  16. 임상훈 . 이시웅 . 최율(2004), 생태마을론. 도서출판 고원
  17. 이재준(2001), 생태마을 사례분석과 전문가 및 거주자 의식조사를 통한 계획방향 설정 연구. 국토계획 36(6), pp.23-39
  18. 井上洋司(2000), 都市を奏でゐ 中庭空間. LANDSCPE DESIGN No.20, pp.34-43
  19. 조연희 . 임승빈(2004), 생태마을의 경관지각에 관한 연구 -시각적 요소를 이용한 일반인의 평가를 중심으로. 농촌계획학회 10(2), pp.17-24
  20. 조연희 . 임승빈(2005), 생태마을의 현황과 과제-안솔기 마을을 중심으로. 농촌계획학회 11(1), pp.55-65
  21. 최율(2002), 방촌마을의 생태주거단지계획. 생태건축: pp.85-101
  22. 황보철 . 이명우(2004), 경관단위 체계를 도입한 생태마을 계획의 특성 평가. 한국조경학회지 32(3), pp.60-75
  23. 현택수(1999), 환경철학의 이해와 생태적 주거의 계획기법에 관한 연구. 한국주거학회지 10(4), pp.147-159