대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제44권5호
  • /
  • Pages.584-593
  • /
  • 2006
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

3차원 유한요소법적 분석을 이용한 5종의첨형 임플랜트에 발생하는 응력의 비교연구

THREE DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT STRESS ANALYSIS OF FIVE DIFFERENT TAPER DESIGN IMPLANT SYSTEMS

  • 변상기 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 박원희 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 이영수 (한양대학교 의과대학 치과학교실)
  • Byun, Sang-Ki (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Park, Won-Hee (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Young-Soo (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Hanyang University)
  • 발행 : 2006.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Statement of problem : Dental implant which has been developed gradually through many experiments and clinical applications is presently used to various dental prosthetic treatments. To conduct a successful function of implant prosthesis in oral cavity for a long time, it is important that not only structure materials must have the biocompatibility, but also the prosthesis must be designed for the stress, which is occurred in occlusion, to scatter adequately of load support. Therefore, it is essential to give the consideration about the stress analysis of supporting tissues for higher successful rates. Purpose : Recently, many implant manufacturing company produce various taper design of root form implant, the fixture is often selected. However, the stress analysis of taper form fixture still requires more studies. Material and method : This study we make the element models that five implant fixture; Branemark system(Nobel Biocare, Gothenberg, Sweden), Camlog system(Altatec, Germany), Astra system(Astra Tech, Sweden), 3i system(Implant Innovations Inc, USA), Avana system(Osstem, Korea) were placed in the area of mandibular first premolar and prosthesis fabricated, which we compared with stress distribution using the three-dimension finite element analysis under two loading condition. Results : This study compares the aspect of stress distribution of each system with the standard of Von mises stress, among many resulted from finite element analysis so that this research gets the following results. 1. In all implant system, oblique loading of maximum Von mises stress of implant, alveolar bone and crown is higher than vertical loading of those. 2. Regardless of loading conditions and type of system, cortical bone which contacts with implant fixture top area has high stress, and cancellous bone has a little stress. under the vertical loading, maximum Von mises stress is more higher in order of Branemark, Camlog, Astra, 3i, Avana. under the horizontal loading, maximum Von mises is more higher in order of Camlog, Branemark, Astra, 3i, Avana.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Branernark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983:50:399-410 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  2. Adell R, Lekholm U, Branernark PI. A 15 year study of osseointegrated edentulous jaw. J Oral Surg 1981:10:387-410 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  3. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants: Requirements for ensuring a longlasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981:52:155-170 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  4. Weinberg A, Kruger B. Biomechanical considerations when combining toothsupported prostheses. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994:78:22-27
  5. Bergman B. Evaluation of results of treatment with osseointegrated implants by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. J Prosthet Dent 1983:50:114-120 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90176-2
  6. Robert Aj, Charles LB. The excessive loss of branemark fixture in type IV bone:A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991:62:2-4 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  7. David MD. The role of implants in the treatment of edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 1990:3:42-49
  8. Holmes DC, Grigsby, Goel VK, Keller JC. Comparison of stress transmission in the IMZ implant system with polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile element: a finite element stress analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992:7:450-458
  9. Patra AK, DePaolo JM, D'Souza KS, DeTolla D, Meenaghan MA. Guidelines for analysis and redesign of dental implants. Implant Dent 1998:7:355-368
  10. Borchers L, Reichart P. Three-dimensional distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res 1983:62:25-29
  11. Haraldson T, Zarb GA. A 10-year follow-up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges. Scand J Dent Rec 1998:96:243-252
  12. Lum LB, Osier JF. Load transfer from endosteal implants to supporting bone: An analysis using statics. Part one: Horizontal Loading. J Oral Implantol. 1992:18:343348
  13. Holmes DC, Grigsby WR, Goel VK: Comparison of stress trans-mission in the IMZ implant system with polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile element: A finite element stress analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992:7:450-458
  14. Frost HM. A determinant of bone architec-ture. the minimum effective strain. Clinical Orthopaedics 1983:175:286-292
  15. Isidor F. Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation. Clinical Oral Impl Res 1997:8:1-9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.1997.tb00001.x
  16. Block MS, Kent JN. Factors associated with soft and hard tissue compromise of endosseous implants. J Oral & Maxillofac Surg 1990:48:1153-1160 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(90)90531-6
  17. Jemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: A preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Prosthet Dent 1989:4:211-217
  18. Lindquist LW, Rockier B, Carlsson GE. Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue integrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1988:59:59-63 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90109-6
  19. Meffert R. Implant therapy. In: Nevins M, Becker W and Kornman KS et al: Proceedings of the world workshop in clinical periodontics, Chicago, American Academy of Periodontology, 1989
  20. Brunski JB, Moccia AF Jr, Pollack SR, Korostoff E, Trachtenberg DI. The influence of functional use of endosseous dental implants on the tissue-implant interface. J Dent Res 1979:58:1953-1969
  21. Robert G. Restorative dental materials, 9th ed: Mosby, 1993:54
  22. Philips RW. Skinners science of dental materials, 8th ed: WB Saunders,1982:55
  23. Kenneth J. Phillips science of dental materials, 10th ed: WB Saunders, 1996:66
  24. Rangert B, Krogh PRJ, Langer B. Bending overload and implant fracture: A retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 1995:10:326-334
  25. Lee YS, Yoo KH. Three Finite Analysis of Mandibular Stress of Complete Denture Occlusion. J Kor Acad Prosthdont 1992:30
  26. Park WH, Lee YS. Three dimensional finite element stress of implant prosthesis according to the different fixture locations and angulations. J Kor Acad Prosthdont 2005:43:61-77
  27. Lum LB, Osier JF. Load transfer from endosteal implants to supporting bone: An analysis using statics. Part two: Axial loading. J Oral Implantol 1992:18:349-353
  28. Carl E. Misch: Contemporary implant dentistry 2nd ed. Mosby 1999