Journal of Nutrition and Health

The Korean Nutrition Society (한국영양학회)
권호 표지

Effects of Different Mandarin Formulations on Antioxidative Capacity and Oxidative DNA Damage in Fifteen-Month Aged Rats

부위가 다른 감귤의 섭취가 노령흰쥐의 항산화능 및 DNA손상에 미치는 영향

  • Kim, Ji-Hye (Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kwon, Sang-Hee (Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Ja-Kyung (Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Mi-Kyung (Department of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Ewha Womans University)
  • 김지혜 (이화여자대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 권상희 (이화여자대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 김자경 (이화여자대학교 식품영양학과) ;
  • 김미경 (이화여자대학교 식품영양학과)
  • Published : 2006.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate the effect of whole mandarin, peel or pulp intake of Citrus unshiu Marc. on antioxidative capacity and oxidative DNA damage in fifteen-month aged rats. Forty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats $(621.9\;{\pm}\;10.1\;g)$ were blocked into four groups according to their body weights as control group, whole mandarin powder group, mandarin peel powder group and mandarin pulp powder group. Rats were raised with diets containing 5% (w/w) freeze dried mandarin formulations for four weeks. Total polyphenol content and total antioxidant status (TAS) of mandarin formulations were highest in peel powder, followed by whole powder and then pulp powder. The 8-hydroxy2'-deoxyguanosine concentrations of kidney in all mandarin groups were significantly lower than that of control group, and that of mandarin peel group was much lower than whole powder and pulp groups. Plasma TAS levels of all the experimental groups were higher than that of control group, and among mandarin groups, peel group showed higher level than remaining two groups. In conclusion, all the mandarin formulations were effective on antioxidative capacity in fifteen-month aged rats, and the peel was most effective one among three formulations.

Keywords

References

  1. National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service. $\ulcorner$Crop Statistics 2004$\lrcorner$, 2005
  2. Spiegel RP, Goldschmidt EE. Biology of Citrus, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, p.13, pp.32-33, 39-43, 88-93, 108-109, 1996
  3. Kang HJ, Chawla SP, Jo C, Kwon JH, Byun MW. Studies on the development of functional powder from citrus peel. Bioresource Technology 97: 614-620, 2006
  4. Laura B. Polyphenols: Chemistry, dietary sources, metabolism, and nutritional significance. Nutrition Rev 56(11): 317-333, 1998
  5. Cha JY, Kim SY, Jeong SJ, Cho YS. Effects of hesperetin and naringenin on lipid concentration in orotic acid treated mice. Kor J Life Science 9: 389-394, 1999
  6. Manthey JA, Grohmann K. Phenols in citrus peel byproducts: concentrations of hydroxycinnamates and polymethoxylated flavones in citrus peel molasses, J Agric Food Chem 49: 3268, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf010011r
  7. Rouseff RL, Martin SF, Youtsey CO. Quantitative survery of narirutin, naringin, hesperidin, and neohesperidin in citrus. J Agric Food Chem 35: 1027, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00078a040
  8. Hwang HJ, Yoon KR. Carotenoid pigment of Citrus fruits cultivated in Korea. Korean J Food Sci Technol 27(6): 950-957, 1995
  9. Kim JH, Kim MK. Effect of different part of mandarin intake on antioxidative capacity in 15-month-old rats. Korean J Nutrition 36(6): 559-569, 2003
  10. Chafer M, Gonzalez-martinez C, Chiralt A, Fito P. Microstructure and vacuum impregnation response of citrus peels. Food Res International 36: 35-41, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(02)00105-9
  11. Lota ML, Serra DR, Tomi F, Casanova J. Chemical variability of peel and leaf essential oils of 15 species of mandarins. Biochemical Systematics Ecology 29: 77-104, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-1978(00)00029-6
  12. Iman AH, Robin BH, Cheryl R. Citrus peel use is associated with reduced risk of squamous cell carinoma of the skin. Nutrition Cancer 37(20): 161-168, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327914NC372_7
  13. Giri RK, Parija T, Das BR. d-Limonene chemoprevention of hepatocar cinogenesis in AKR mice: inhibition of c-jun and c-myc. Oncol Rep 6: 1123-1127, 1999
  14. Yano H, Tatuta M, Iishi H, Baba M, Sakai N. Attenuation by dlimonene of sodium chloride-enhanced gastric carcinogenesis induced by N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine in Wistar rats. Int J Cancer 82: 665-668, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990827)82:5<665::AID-IJC8>3.0.CO;2-E
  15. Kawamori T, Tanaka T, Hirose M, Mori H. Inhibitory effects of d-limonene on the development of colonic aberrant crypt foci induced by azoxymethane in F-344 rats. Carcinogenesis 17: 369-372, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/17.2.369
  16. Ames BN. Endogenous oxidative DNA damage, aging, and cancer, Free Radical Res Commun 7: 121-128, 1989 https://doi.org/10.3109/10715768909087933
  17. Cadet J, Douki T, Gasparutto D, Ravanat JL. Oxidative damage to DNA: for mation, measurement and biochemical features. Mutat Res 531: 523, 2003
  18. Matsuzawa A, Ichijo H. Stress-responsive protein kinases in redoxregulated apoptosis signaling. Antioxid Redox Signal 7: 472-481, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2005.7.472
  19. Iliakis G, Wang Y, Guan J, Wang H. DNA damage checkpoint control in cells exposed to ionizing radiation. Oncogene 22: 5834-5847, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1206682
  20. Lunec J, Holloway KA, Cooke MS, Faux S, Griffiths HR, Evans MD. Urinary 8-oxo-2V-deoxyguanosine: redox regulation of DNA repair in vivo. Free Radic Biol Med 33: 875-885, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(02)00882-1
  21. David JH, Laura AB, Chris AP. Oxidative DNA damage in mouse heart, liver, and lung tissue due to acute side-stream tobacco smoke exposure. Arch Biochemistry Biophysics 352(2): 293-297, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.1998.0605
  22. Thompson LU, Yoon JH, Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Jenkins AL. Relationship between polyphenol intake and blood glucose response of normal and diabetic individuals. Am J Clin Nutr 39(5): 745-751, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/39.5.745
  23. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th Ed. AOAC international USA, 1995
  24. McCusker CA. Fizgerald SP. Measurement of total antioxidant status in beverages using a rapid automated method. Randox Laboratory Ltd., Ardmore, Diamond road, Crumlin, Co., 199
  25. Marklund S, Marklund G. Involvement of the superoxide anion radical in the autoxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for superoxide dismutase. Eur J Biochem 47: 469, 1974 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03714.x
  26. Reeves PG, Nielsen FH, Fahey GC. AIN-93 purified diets for laboratory rodents: final report of the American Institute Nutrition Ad Hoc Wrighting Committee on the reformulation of the AIN-76A rodent diet. J Nutr 123: 1939-1951, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/123.11.1939
  27. Helbock HJ, Beckman KB, Ames BN. 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine and 8-hydroxyguanine as biomarkers as oxidative DNA damage. In: Methods in Enzymolozy vol 300 'oxidants and antioxidants part B' ed. Lester packer p156-163, Academic press, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)00123-8
  28. Gorinstein S, Martin-Belloso O, Park YS, Haruenkit R, Lojek A, Ciz M, Caspi A, Libman I, Trakhtenberg S. Comparison of some biochemical characteristics of different citrus fruits. Food Chemistry 74: 309-315, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00157-1
  29. Li BB, Smith B, Hossain MD. Extraction of phenolics from citrus peels I Solvent extraction method. Separation Purification Technology 48: 182-188, 2006
  30. Aldini G, Yeum K, Russell R, Krinsky N. A method to measure the oxidizability of both the aqueous and lipid compartments of plasma. Free Radical Biology Med 31(9): 1043-1050, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-5849(01)00684-0
  31. Gardner P, White T, McPhail D, Duthie G. The relative contributions of vitamin C, carotenoids and phenolics to the antioxidant potential of fruit juices. Food Chem 68: 471-474, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00225-3
  32. Kim YK, Hyun SW, Ko YH. Analysis of essential oils from the peel of mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc. Var. Okitsu). Kor J Food Sci Technol 31(5): 1178-1183, 1999
  33. Lota ML, Dominique S, Felix T, Casanova J. Chemical variability of peel and leaf essential oils of 15 species of mandarins. Biochemical Systematics Ecology 29: 77-104, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-1978(00)00029-6
  34. Tian Q, Miller E, Ahmad H, Tang L, Patil B. Differential inhibition of human cancer cell proliferation by citrus limonoids. Nutr Cancer 40(2): 180-184, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327914NC402_15
  35. Halliwell B. Why and how should we measure oxidative DNA damage in nutrition studies? How far have we come? Am J Clin Nutr 72: 1082-1087, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/72.5.1082
  36. Richter C. Oxidative damage to mitochondrial DNA and its relationship to ageing. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 27(7): 647-653, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/1357-2725(95)00025-K
  37. Schmerold I, Niedermuller H. Levels of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine in cellular DNA from 12 tissue of young and old Sprague-Dawley rats. Experimental Gerontology 36(8): 1375-1386, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0531-5565(01)00103-6
  38. Noroozi M, Angerson W, Lean M. Effects of flavonoids and vitamin C on oxidative DNA damage to human lymphocytes. Am J Clin Nutr 67: 1210-1218, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/67.6.1210
  39. Lee BM, Lee SK, Kim HS. Inhibition of oxidative DNA damage, 8-OHdG, and carbonyl contents in smokers treated with antioxidants (vitamin E, vitamin C, ${\beta}$-carotene and red ginseng). Cancer Lett 132: 219-227, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3835(98)00227-4