Establishment of Artificial Screening Methods and Evaluation of Barley Germplasms for Resistance to Fusarium Head Blight

보리 붉은곰팡이병 검정법과 저항성 품종 선발

  • Han Ouk-Kyu (Honam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS, RDA) ;
  • Kim Jung-Gon (Honam Agricultural Research Institute, NICS, RDA)
  • 한옥규 (작물과학원 호남농업연구소) ;
  • 김정곤 (작물과학원 호남농업연구소)
  • Published : 2005.06.01

Abstract

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a severe disease problem that affects the quality and yield of barley grain. The evaluation of FHB resistance is difficult because environmental conditions greatly influence FHB infection and development. The objectives of this study were to: 1) establish an efficient screening method for selecting resistant barley to FHB, 2) compare FHB severity between the cut-spike method and pot-plant method for development of mass screening, and 3) estimate FHB resistance for barley germplasms. Barley cultivars and lines were evaluated for reaction to FHB in controlled-greenhouse condition. Spikes were spray-inoculated with a suspension $(5.0\times10^5\;macroconidia\;mL^{-1})$ of Fusarium graminearum SCK-O4 strain, and then kept in a greenhouse at $18-25^{\circ}C$ with $80-100\%$ relative humidity. Inoculation were employed at 3 different heading growth stages (heading date, three days after heading, and five days after heading). The inoculation was performed in 2 consecutive days in order to avoid escapes. The inoculated plants were maintained in the greenhouse at 4 different free moisture periods (1, 3, 5, and 7 days). The percentage of FHB severity was scored from 0 to 9 according to the rate of infected kernels per spike, and three spikes were evaluated per replication with 3 replicates. There were significant differences of FHB severity depending on the different free moisture periods, but not by the inoculation at different heading stages. The optimum evaluation point of FHB severity in the greenhouse condition was on the 7th day under free moisture condition after inoculation at the heading date. Infection level in cut-spike method highly correlated with that in pot-plant method. This suggested that cut-spike method is useful in evaluating of FHB resistance in barley. Six cultivars, such as Jinkwang, Buheung, Atahualpha 92, Chevron-b, Gobernadora-d, and MNBrite-c, were selected as resistant varieties to FHB. Correlation coefficient for the FHB severity evaluated by the pot-plant method between two seasons was 0.794, indicating the stability and accuracy of the screening method.

이 실험은 보리의 붉은곰팡이병에 대한 정밀하고 효율성이 높은 검정체계를 확립하고, 이를 토대로 저항성 품종을 선발하고자 실시하였다. 이를 위해서 온$\cdot$습도 조절이 가능한 붉은곰팡이병 전용 습실 검정상을 제작하여 포트 재배한 식물체에 3개의 다른 접종시기별(출수기, 출수후 3일, 출수후 5일)로 SCK-O4 균주의 분생포자 현탁액 $5.0\times10^5$ macroconidia $mL^{-1}$를 각각 접종하고 4개의 다른 기간 동안 습실처리(1, 3, 5, 7일)를 하여 각 처리별 이병 정도를 평가하였다. 또한 절단이 삭검정법을 통한 대량검정법도 검토하였다. 1. 습실 검정상 내에서의 붉은곰팡이병 발병률은 접종시기에 따라 차이를 보이지 않았으나, 습실처리기간에 따라서는 유의한 차이를 보였다. 2.습실 검정상을 이용한 붉은곰팡이병의 저항성 검정은 출수기에 접종하고 습실 검정상 내에서 7일간 유지하여 판정하는 것이 가장 효율적이었다. 3. 포트검정법과 절단이삭검정법의 검정방법간 발병 정도는 고도로 유의한 정의 상관$(r=0.892^{***})$을 보였다. 4. 저항성 품종은 진광보리, 부흥, Atahualpha92, Chevron-b, Gobernadora-d 및 MNBrite-c 등이 선발되었으며, 이들 품종은 2개의 검정시기에서 일정한 저항성을 나타내었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Andersen, A L 1949 The development of Gtbberella zeae headbhght of wheat. Phytopathol. 38 . 595-611
  2. Argyns, J, D. V Sanford, and D. Tekrony. 2003. Fusartum gramtnearum infection during wheat seed development and Its effect on seed quality Crop Sci. 45(3) : 1782-1788
  3. Bar, G-H. and G Shaner 1994. Scab of wheat: Prospects for control. Plant Dis 78 760-766 https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-78-0760
  4. Bai, G-H and G Shaner 2004. Management and resistance in wheat and barley to Fusarium head blight Annu Rev. Phytopathol. 42 . 135-161 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.040803.140340
  5. Buerstrnayr, H , L. Legzdma, B. Stemer, and M Lemmens 2004. Variation for resistance to Fusanum head blight m spring barley Euphytica 137.279-290 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000040440.99352.b9
  6. Campbell, K A G and P. E Lipps. 1998 Allocation of resources: Sources of variation in Fusarium head blight screening nurseries Phytopathol 88(10) 1078-1085 https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1998.88.10.1078
  7. 조장환, 한옥규, 이동진, 박문웅. 2004 맥류생산과학 도서출판 한림원, 서울. ,p 105
  8. Gocho, H. and T HIrai 1987. Varietal resistance to scab in barley Barley Genetics V 625-630
  9. Hall, M D. and D. A Van Stanford 2003 Diallel analysis of Fusarium head blight resistance in soft winter wheat. Crop Sci 43 : 1663-1670 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.1663
  10. 小泉信三, 加藤 肇, 野嶺一, 駒田 旦, 一戸正勝, 梅原吉黃, 林 長生 1993 ムギ類赤かひ病の疫原學的. 疫學的研究 農研センタ ー研報 23 1-104
  11. 이인원. 2003. 맥류 붉은곰팡이병 품종 저항성과 진균독소 생성능과의 상관관계 분석. 농촌진흥청 산학연공동연구과제 연차보고서
  12. Legzdina, L. and H. Buerstmayr. 2004 Comparison of infection with Fusarium head blight and accumulation of mycotoxins in gram of hullness and covered barley. J. Cereal Sci. 40 61-67 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2004.03.002
  13. Martin, R A and H W Johnson. 1982 Effects and control of Fusarium diseases of cereal grains in the Atlantic provinces. Can J. Plant. Pathol 4 : 210-216 https://doi.org/10.1080/07060668209501327
  14. Mesfin, A , K. P. Smith, R. Dill-Macky, C K. Evans, R. Waugh, C D Gustus, and G J. Muehlbauer. 2003 Quantitative trait loci for Fusarium head blight resistance III barley detected III a two-rowed by six-rowed population Crop Sci 43 . 307-318 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.0307
  15. Miedancer, T, M. Moldovan, and M. Ittu 2003. Comparison of spray and point inoculation to assess resistance to Fusarium head blight III a multienvironoment wheat trial Phytopathol. 93(9) 1068-1072 https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.9.1068
  16. 武田和義, 部田英雄 1989 オオギにお る赤かび病檢定法の開發と耐病性品種の檢索 .育種學雑誌 39 . 203-216
  17. 西尾善太, 李俊明, 高田兼則, 桑原達雄, 坂 智宏. 2000 注射接種法 による赤かび炳抵抗性 評償およびCIMMYT, USDA 導入品種の赤かび病抵抗性. 育種. 作物學會北海道談話會報 41 : 63-64
  18. Parry, D W., P Jenkmson, and L McLeod 1995. Fusarium ear blight (scab) in small gram cereals-a review Plant Pathol 44: 207-238 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.1995.tb02773.x
  19. Rudd, J.C., R D. Horsley, A. L McKendry, and E M. Elias 2001. Host plant resistance genes for Fusanum head blight. sources, mechamsms, and utility III conventional breeding systems Crop Sci 41 620-627 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.413620x
  20. Schroeder, H. Wand J. J Christensis 1963 Factors affecting resistance of wheat to scab caused by Gtbberella zeae Phytopathol. 58 .831-838
  21. Steffenson, B. J 1998. Fusarium head blight. Epidemics, Impact, and breeding for resistance Technical quality 35(4) 177-184
  22. Strange, R N. and H. Smith 1971 A fungal growth stimulant m anthers which predisposes wheat to attack by F gramnearum Psysiological Plant Pathol. 1 : 141-150 https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-4059(71)90023-3
  23. 竹上静夫 1957 赤かひ病封するノト変品種の抵抗性に關する研究. 第l報 赤かび炳小麥の1 小穗內の初發炳類花の位置と品種間差異及び葯骸との關係. 岡山大學農學部學術報告 10 . 33-42
  24. Wingbermuehle, W. J , C. Gustus, and K P. Smith 2004. Exploitmg selective genotyping to study genetic diversity of resistance to Fusarium head blight in barley. Teor Appl Genet. 109 : 1160-1168 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1733-6
  25. Xu, Y. G and L F Chen 1993. Wheat Scab: Theory and practice on control Nanjing, China; Jiangsu Sci -Tech Publ. House
  26. 吉田めぐみ, 河田尙之 ,塔野岡卓司 2003 ポット検定法による高程度赤かび病抵抗性検定 作物年報 3 . 1-19