EVALUATION OF BONE RESPONSE BY RESONANCE FREQUENCY ANALYSIS OF ANODIZED IMPLANTS

  • Roh Hyun-Ki (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Heo Seong-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Rhyu In-Chul (Department of Periodontics, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2005.12.01

Abstract

Statement of problem. Resonance frequency analysis has been increasingly served as a non-invasive and objective method for clinical monitoring of implant stability. Many clinical studies must be required for standardized data using RFA. Purpose. This study was performed to evaluate RFA value changes in two anodized implant groups. Material and method. Among a total of 24 implants, twelve screw shaped implants as a test group (H2-R8.5) were manufactured, which had a pitch-height of 0.4 mm, an outer diameter of 4.3 mm, a length of 8.5 mm, and external hexa-headed, were turned from 5 mm rods of commercially pure titanium (ASTM Grade IV, Warantec Co., Seoul, Korea), and another twelve implants as a control group were $Br{\aa}nemark$ Ti-Unite MK4 (diameter 4.0 mm, length 8.5 mm). Each group was installed in tibia of rabbit. Two implants were placed in each tibia (four implants per rabbit). Test two implants were inserted in right side and control two in left side. ISQ values were measured using $Osstell^{TM}$ (Integration Diagnostics Ltd. Sweden) during fixture installation, and 12 weeks later and evaluated the RFA changes. Results. Mean and SD of baseline ISQ values of test group were $75.0{\pm}3.4$ and $68.7{\pm}8.1$ for control group. Mean and SO of ISQ values 12 weeks after implant insertion were $73.2{\pm}4.7$ for test group and $72.6{\pm}3.9$ for control group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in ISQ values after 3 months (P>0.05). From the data, RFA gains after 3 months were calculated, and there was statistically significant difference between groups (P<0.05). Conclusion. Although there were RFA changes between groups, implant stability after experimental period shows alike tendency and good bone responses.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Kasemo B, Larsson K. The interface zone of inorganic implant in vivo ; Titanium implants in bone. Ann Biomed Eng 1983;11:1-27 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02363944
  2. Kasemo B, Lausmaa J. Aspect of surface physics on titanium implants. Swed Dent J 1983;28(Suppl.):19-36
  3. Zitter H, Plenk HJ. The electrochemical behavior of metallic implant materials as indicator of their biocompatibility. J Biomed Mater Res 1987;21:881-896 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820210705
  4. Solar RJ, Pollack SR, Korostoff E. In vitro corrosion testing of titanium surgical implant alloys: an approach to understanding titanium release from implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1979;13:217-250 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820130206
  5. Tengvall P, Lindstrom I. Physico-chemical considerations of titanium as a biomaterial. Clin Mater 1992;9:115-134 https://doi.org/10.1016/0267-6605(92)90056-Y
  6. Ishizawa H, Ogino M. Formation and characterization of anodic titanium oxide films containing Ca and P. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:65-72 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820290110
  7. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong YS, Albrektsson T. The electrochemical oxide growth behavior on titanium in acid and alkaline electrolytes. Med Eng and Phys 2001;23:329-46 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4533(01)00050-9
  8. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a pognotic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501
  9. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Resonance Frequency Analysis : Measuring implant stability and osseointegration. Compendium 1998;19:493-502
  10. Park C. A study of the measurement of the implant stability using resonance frequency analysis. PhD thesis, 2000, Dankook University, Korea
  11. Albrektsson, T., Branemark, P.I., Hansson, H., & Lindstrom, J. (1981) Osseointegratd titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 52, 155 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776