대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제43권2호
  • /
  • Pages.149-157
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

파절된 도재면에 대한 수종의 도재 수리 시스템의 인장결합강도

TENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF FOUR PORCELAIN REPAIR SYSTEMS

  • 전영아 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 양병덕 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이호진 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 박주미 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 송광엽 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Jeon Young-A (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Yang Byung-Duk (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee Ho-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park Ju-Mi (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Song Kwang-Yeob (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 발행 : 2005.04.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Statement of problem. Dental ceramics exhibit excellent esthetic property, compressive strength, chemical durability biocompatibility and translucency. However, it suffers from inherent brittle fractures. Various techniques and materials for intraoral porcelain repair has been suggested. Purpose. This study is to compare the tensile bond strength of four commonly used porcelain repair systems (Vivadent, Bisco, Ulttadent, Voco) and to insure the best system for the clinical application to the fractured porcelain. Materials and methods. A total of fifty specimens were fabricated. Specimens were stored in $37^{\circ}C$ distilled water for 7 days and thermocycling was performed(1000 cycles), and subjected to a tensile force parallel to the repair resin and porcelain interface by use of an Universal Testing Machine. Result. 1. Voco showed the highest tensile bond strength. In decreasing order, the tensile bond strength of the other materials was as follows : Ultradent, Bisco, Vivadent. 2. There was a statistically significant difference between the porcelain repair systems(Voco, Ultradent > Bisco, Yivadent) (p<0.05). 3. SEM examination of prepared porcelain surfaces revealed that the surface treated with Voco showed brittle fracture. However, Ultradent, Bisco and Vivadent showed ductile fracture. 4. All specimens treated with four porcelain repair systems showed adhesive failure between porcelain and composite resin.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Libby G, Arcuri MR, LaVelle WE, Hebl L. Longevity of fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:127-131 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70115-X
  2. Haselton DR. Diaz-Arnold AM, Dunne JT. Shear bond strengths of 2 intraoral porcelain repair systems to porcelain or metal substrates. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:526-531 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.119843
  3. Pratt RC, Burgess JO, Schwartz RS, Smith JH. Evaluation of bond strength of six porcelain repair systems. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:11-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90037-1
  4. Dent RJ. Repair of porcelain-fused-to metal restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:661
  5. Cohen B, Weiner S. Restoration of fixed partial dentures with fractured porcelain veneers using an overcasting. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:390-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90166-2
  6. Pameijer CH, Louw NP. Repairing fractured porcelain: how surface preparation affects shear force resistance. JADA 1996;127:203-209
  7. Newberg R, Pameijer CH. Composite resin bonded to porcelain with a silane solution. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;96:288-91
  8. Nowlin TP, Barghi N, Norling BK. Evaluation of the bonding of three porcelain repair systems. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:516-518 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90240-7
  9. Bailey JH. Porcelain-to-composite bond strengths using four organosilane materials. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:174-177 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90368-5
  10. Tylka DF, Stewart GP. Comparison of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel and hydrofluoric acid etchants for porcelain-composite repair. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:121
  11. Della Bona A, Van Noort R. Shear vs. tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic. J Dent Res 1995;74:1591-1596 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740091401
  12. Chadwick RG, Mason AG, Sharp W. Attempted evaluation of three porcelain repair systems- what are we really testing? J Oral Rehabil 1998;25:610-5 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00283.x
  13. Semmelman JO, Kulp PR. Silane bonding porcelain teeth to acrylic. J Am Dent Assoc 1968;76:69-73
  14. Jochen DG, Caputo AA. Composite resin repair of porcelain denture teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1977;38:673-9
  15. Bertolotti RL, Lacy AM, Watanabe LG. Adhesive monomers for porcelain repair. lnt J Prosthodont 1989;2:483-9
  16. Lacy AM, LaLuz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:288-291 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90270-3
  17. Calamia JR, Etched porcelain veneers. The current state of the art. Quint Int. 1985;16:5-12
  18. Suliman AB, Swift EJ, Perdigao J. Effects of surface treatment and bonding agents on bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:118-120 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90004-8
  19. Kupiec KA, Wuertz KM, Barkmeier WW, Wilwerding TM. Evaluation of porcelain surface treatments and agents for compositeto-porcelain repair. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:119-124 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90294-2
  20. Philips RW. Science of dental materials. 8th ed. Philadelphia:WB Saunders, 1982;244-245
  21. Bowen RL. Properties of a silica-rein-forced polymer for dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1963;66:57-64
  22. Plueddeman EP. Silane coupling agents. New York: Plenum Press, 1982:17
  23. Culler SR et al. Investigations of silane priming solutions to repair fractured porcelain crowns. J Dent Res 1986;65:191
  24. Kato H, Matsumura H, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Bond strength & durability of porcelain bonding system. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:163-168 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90094-3
  25. Gregory WA, Moss SM. Effects of heterogenous layers of composite and time on composite repair of porcelain. Oper Dent 1990;15:18-22
  26. Lai JH, Johnson AE. Mesuring polymerization shrinkage of photo-activated restorative materials by a water-filled dilatometer. Dent Mater 1993;9:139-143 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90091-4
  27. Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1987;66:1460-1465 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660091001
  28. Nelson E, Barghi H. Effect of APF etching time on resin bonded porcelain. J Dent Res 1989;68:271
  29. Senda A, Suziki M, Jordan RE. The effect of fluorides and hydrofluoric acids on porcelain swfaces. J Dent Res 1989;68:236
  30. Diaz-Arnold AM et al. Bond strengths of porcelain repair adhesive systems. Am J Dent 1993;6:291-294
  31. Sindel J, Gehrlicher S, Petschelt A. Study of adhesion of composite to porcelainfused-to-metal ceramics. DZZ 1996;11:51
  32. Jones DW, Wilson HJ. Some properties of dental ceramics. J Oral Rehabil 2:379-96 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1975.tb01538.x