Neighborhood Characteristics and Individual Health under Korean Context

한국적 특수성을 고려한 지역특성과 개인의 건강

  • 정성원 (서울의료원 연구소 의료정책연구실) ;
  • 조영태 (서울대학교 보건대학원)
  • Published : 2005.09.01

Abstract

Recently much attention has been paid to the effect of neighborhood characteristics on the health of individuals, independent of individual demographic and/or socioeconomic characteristics. Although many empirical studies of a kind, mostly based on Western society, have appeared on various international journals, few studies have shown empirical evidence of neighborhood characteristics as an independent and significant risk factor of ill health in Korea. This paper discusses possible reasons that neighborhood seems to be neither significant nor substantial regarding its impact on the health of Koreans. Addressing the uniqueness of Korean society regarding the concept of neighborhood, attributes of neighborhoods, and methodological challenges, authors suggest that more sophisticated conceptual and methodological approach, specific to Korean society, should enable to reveal the effect of neighborhood characteristics on individual health in Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. Fang J, Madhavan S, Bosworth W, Alderman MH. Residential segregation and mortality in New York City. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47: 469- 476 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00128-2
  2. Finch BK, Vega WA, Kolody B. Substance use during pregnancy in the State of California, USA. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52: 571-583 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00161-1
  3. Waitzman NJ, Smith KR. Phantom of the area: poverty-area residence and mortality in the United States. Am J Public Health 1998; 88: 973-976 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.88.6.973
  4. Duncan C, Jones K, Moon G. Smoking and deprivation: are there neighbourhood effects? Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 497-505 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00360-8
  5. South S, Baumer EP, Lutz A. Interpreting community effects on youth educational attainment. Youth & Soc 2003; 35(1): 3-36 https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X03254560
  6. Turley RNL. When do neighborhoods matter? The role of race and neighborhood peers. Soc Sci Res 2003; 32(1): 61-79 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-089X(02)00013-3
  7. Kawachi I, Kennedy BP, Glass R. Social capital and self-rated health: a contextual analysis. Am J Public Health 1999; 89: 1187-1193 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.89.8.1187
  8. McCulloch A. An examination of social capital and social disorganisation in neighborhoods in the British household panel study. Soc Sci Med 2003; 56(7): 1425-1438 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00139-9
  9. Yen IH, Syme SL. The social environment and health: a discussion of the epidemiologic literature. Ann Rev Publ Health 1999; 20: 287- 308 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.20.1.287
  10. Bolye MH, Willms JD. Place effects for areas defined by administrative boundaries. Am J Epidemiol 1999; 149: 577-585 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009855
  11. Massey DS. The age of extremes: concentrated affluence and poverty in the twenty-first century. Demography 1996; 33: 395-412 https://doi.org/10.2307/2061773
  12. Link BG, Phelan JC. Understanding sociodemographic differences in health - the role of fundamental social causes. Am J Publ Health 1996; 86: 471-473 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.86.4.471
  13. Robert SA. Socioeconomic position and health: The independent contribution of community socioeconomic context. Ann Rev Sociol 1999; 25: 489-516 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.25.1.489
  14. Macintyre S, Maciver S, Sooman A. Area, class and health: Should we be focusing on places or people? J Sociol Policy 1993; 22: 213-234 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279400019310
  15. Curtis S, Jones IR. Is there a place for geography in the analysis of health inequality? Sociol Health Illn 1998; 20: 645-672 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00123
  16. Ross CE, Mirowsky J. Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and health. J Health Soc Behav 2001; 42:258-276 https://doi.org/10.2307/3090214
  17. Cho Y, Park G, Echevarria-Cruz S. Perceived neighborhood characteristics and the health of adult Koreans. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60(6): 1285-1297 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.054
  18. Kreft I,Leeuw JD. Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage Publication. 1998
  19. Snijders T, Bosker R. Multilevel analysis. London: Sage Publication. 1999
  20. Diez-Roux AV. The study of group-level factors in epidemiology: Rethinking variables, study designs, and analytical approaches. Epidemiol Rev 2004; 26: 104-111 https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxh006