Field Study of Concentrations and Emissions of Particulate Contaminants by Types of Swine Houses in Korea

돈사 작업장 유형에 따른 입자상 오염물질의 실내농도 및 발생량에 관한 현장 조사

  • Kim, Ki-Yeon (Department of Preventive Medicine & Public Health, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Jae-Beom (Department of Preventive Medicine & Public Health, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Chi-Nyon (Institute for Occupational Health, College of Medicine, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Kyung-Jong (Department of Preventive Medicine & Public Health, Ajou University School of Medicine)
  • 김기연 (아주대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 박재범 (아주대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 김치년 (연세대학교 의과대학 산업보건연구소) ;
  • 이경종 (아주대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Published : 2005.06.01

Abstract

Objectives: Particulate contaminants, such as total and respirable dusts, can harm the health of farm workers via several routes. The principal aims of this field study were to determine the concentrations and emissions of particulate contaminants: total and respirable dusts, in the different types of swine houses used in Korea, and allow objective comparison between Korea and the other countries in terms of swine housing types. Methods: The swine houses investigated in this research were selected with respect to three criteria: the manure removal system, ventilation mode and growth stage of pigs. Measurements of total and respirable dust concentrations and emissions in the swine houses were carried out on 5 housing types at 15 different farm sites per housing type. The swine houses investigated were randomly selected from farms situated within the central districts in Korea: province of Kyung-gi, Chung-buk and Chung-nam. Results: The total and respirable dust concentrations in the swine houses averaged $1.88\;and\;0.64mg/m^3$, ranging from $0.53\;to\;4.37mg/m^3$ and from $0.18\;to\;1.68mg/m^3$, respectively. The highest concentrations of total and respirable dusts were found in the swine houses with deep-litter bed systems: $2.94mg/m^3\;and\;1.14 mg/m^3$, while the lowest concentrations were found in the naturally ventilated buildings with slats: $0.83mg/m^3\;and\;0.24mg/m^3$, respectively (p<0.05). All the swine houses investigated did not exceed the threshold limit values (TLVs) for total ($10mg/m^3$) and respirable ($2.5mg/m^3$) dusts. The mean emissions of total and respirable dusts, per pig (75 kg in terms of live weight) and area ($m^2$), from the swine houses were 97.33 and 9.55 mg/h/pig and $37.14\;and\;12.83mg/h/m^2$, respectively. The swine houses with deep-litter bed systems showed the highest emissions of total and respirable dusts (p<0.05). However, the emissions of total and respirable dusts from the other swine houses were not significantly different (p>0.05). Conclusion: The concentrations and emissions of total and respirable dusts were relatively higher in the swine houses managed with deep-litter bed systems and ventilated naturally of the different swine housing types tested. In further research, more farms than the number used in this research should be investigated, which will present objective and accurate data on the concentrations and emissions of total and respirable dusts in Korean swine houses. In addition, personal sampling should be performed to objectively assess the exposure level of farm workers to particulate contaminants.

Keywords

References

  1. Hinds WC. Aerosol technology. New York: John Willey & Sons; 1982
  2. Pearson CC, Sharples TJ, Airborne dust concentrations in livestock buildings and the effect of feed. J Aglic Eng Res 1995; 60: 145-154 https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1995.1008
  3. Carpenter GA. Dust in livestock buildings-review of some aspects. J Agric Eng Res 1986: 33:227-241 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8634(86)80038-5
  4. Wathes CM, Randall, JM. Aerosol sampling in animal houses. Commission of the European Communities Report EUR 11877 EN; 1989. p141
  5. Fuchs NA. The mechanics of aerosols. Oxford Pergamon Press; 1964
  6. Gregory PH. The microbiology of the atmosphere. aylesbury: Leonard Hill; 1973
  7. Wathes CM, Jones CDR, Wehster AJF Ventilation, air hygiene and animal health. Vet Rec 1983; Dec.: 554-559
  8. Hong YC, Cho SH. Health effects of ambient particulate pollutants. Korea J Prev Med 2001; 34(2): 103-108 (Korean)
  9. Koon J, Howes JR, Grub W, Rollo CA. Poultry dust: origin and composition, Agric Eng 1963. 4: 608-609
  10. Harry EG. Air pollution in farm buildings and methods of methods: a review. Avian Pathol 1978; 7: 441-454 https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457808418301
  11. Welford RA, Feddes JJR, Barber EM. Pig building dustiness as affected by caoola oil in the feed. Can Agric Eng 1992; 34: 365-373
  12. Hartung 1. Dust in livestock buildings as a carrier of odours: a review. Paper presented at FAa conference on odours from organic sludges, National Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Silsoe; 1985
  13. Bundy DS, Hazen TE. Dust levels in swine confinement systems associated with different feeding methods. Trans ASAE 1975; 18: 138 144
  14. Honey LF, McQuitty JB. Some physical factors affecting dusl concentrations in a pig facility. Can Agric Eng 1971; 21 (1): 11-14
  15. Donham KJ, Merchant JA. Lassie D, Popendorf WJ, Burmeister LF. Preventing respiratory disease in swine onfinement workers: intervention through applied epidemiology, education and consultation. Am J Ind Med 1990; 18: 241-261 https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.4700180303
  16. 농림부. 가축사육통계. 2003
  17. Takai H, Pederson S, Johnsen .O, Metz JHM, Koerkamp PWG, Uenk GH, Phillips VR, Holden MR, Sneath RW, Shalt JL, White RP, Hartung J, Seedorf J, Schroder M, Linkert KH, Wathes CM, Concentrations and emissions of airborne dust in livestock buildings in Northern Europe. J Agric Eng Res 1998; 70: 59-77 https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1997.0280
  18. Chang CW, Chung R Huang CF, Su, HJJ. Exposure assessment to airborne endotoxin, dust, ammonia, hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide in open style swine houses. Ann Occup Hyg 2001;45:457-465 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4878(00)00081-8
  19. Crook B, Robertson JF, Glass SA, Botheroyd EM, Lacey J, Topping MD. Airborne dust, ammonia, microorganisms, and antigens in pig confinement houses and the respiratory health of exposed fann workers. Am Ind Hyg Assac J 1991; 52: 271-279 https://doi.org/10.1080/15298669191364721
  20. Attwood P, Ruigewaard R, Versloot P, DeWit R, Heederik D. Boleij JSM. A study of the relationship hetween airborne contaminants and environment factors In Dutch swine confinement buildings. Am Ind Hyg Assac J 1987;48: 745-751 https://doi.org/10.1080/15298668791385507
  21. Duchaine C, Grimord Y, Cormier Y. Influence of building maintenance, environmental factors, and seasons on airborne contaminants of swine confinement buildings. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 2000; 61(1): 56-63
  22. Heber AJ, Stroik M, Faubion JM, Willard LH. Size distribution and identification of aerial dust particles in swine finishing buildings. Trans ASAE 1988; 31: 882-887
  23. Yoo DH, Kim HA, H대 Y, Sung JH, Lee HK, Park, YG. Concentration of dusts and endotoxin in swine confinement buildings. J Kareon Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2003; 13: 45-52
  24. SAS Institute Inc. SAS user's guide. SAS Inst., lnc, Gary, NC; 1999
  25. Curtis ES, Drummond JG, Kelley KW, Grunloh DJ, Meares VJ, Norton HW, Jensen AB. Diurnal and annual fluctuations of aerial bacterial and dust levels in enclosed swine houses.J Anim Sci 1975; 41: 1502-1511
  26. Donham KJ, Scallon LJ, Popendorf W. Characerization of dusts collected from swine confmement buildings. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 1986; 47: 404-410 https://doi.org/10.1080/15298668691389955
  27. Meyer DJ, Manbeck HB. Dust levels in mechanically ventilated swine barns. ASAE Paper No. 86-4042. SI. Joseph, MI, 49085. ASAE.1986
  28. Heber AJ, Stroik M. Influence of environmental factors on dust characteristics in swine finishing houses. Proceedings of International Livestock Environment Symposium Ill, Ontario, Canada, 25-27 April. p.ASAE291-298.1988
  29. Barber EM, Dawson JR, Battams VA Nicol RAC. Spatial variability of airborne and settled dust in a piggery, J Agric Eng Res 1991; 50: 107-127 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8634(05)80009-5
  30. Pederson S. Time based variation in airborne dust in respect to animal activity. Proceedings of International Livestock Environment Symposium IV, Warwick, England, 6-9 July. ASAE; 1993. p. 718-726
  31. Hinz T, Linke S. A comprehensive experimental study of aerial pollutant, in and emissions from livestock buildings. Part 2: Results. J Agric Eng Res 1998; 70: 119-129 https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1998.0282
  32. Zhang Y, Tanaka A, Dosman JA, Senthilselvan A, Barber EM, Kirychuk SP, Holfeld LE, Hurst TS. Acute respiratory responses of human subjects to air quality In a swine building. J Agric Eng Res 1998; 70: 367-373 https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1998.0289
  33. Wang X, Zhang Y, Riskowski GL, Ellis M. Measurement and analysis of dust spatial distribution in a mechanically ventilated pig building. Biosys Eng 2002; 81(2): 225-236 https://doi.org/10.1006/bioe.2001.0014
  34. Stowell RR. Foster S. Ammonia emissions from a High-Rise swine finishing facility. ASAE Paper No. 00-4080 2000; 51. Joseph, Mich. ASAE
  35. Grub W, Rollo CA, Howes JR. Dust problems in poultry environments. Trans ASAE 1965; 8: 338-339
  36. Nilsson C. Dust investigations in pig houses. Report No. 25. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; 1982
  37. Yoder MF, Van Wicklen GL. Respirable aerosol generation by broiler chickens. Trans ASAE 1988; 31: 1510-1517
  38. Seedorf I Hartung J, Schroder M, Linkert KH, Phillips VR, Holden MR, Sneath RW, Short JL, White RP, Pederson S, Takai H, Johnsen Jo' Metz JHM, Koerkamp PWG, Uenk GH. Wathes CM. Concentratlons and enussions ot airborne endotoxins and microorganisms in livestock buildings in Northern Europe. J Agric Eng Res 1998;70:97-109 https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1997.0281
  39. Klooster CE, Roelofs PFMM, Gijsen PAM. Positioning air inlet and air outlet to reduce dust exposure in pig buildings. Proceedings of International Livestock Environment Symposium IV, Warwick, England, 6-9 July. ASAE; 1993. p. 754-761
  40. Chiba LI, Ju ER, Lewis AI. Use ot dietary tat to reduce dust, aerial ammonia and bacterial colony forming particle concentrations in swine confinement buildings. Trans ASAE 1987;30:464-468
  41. MWPS. Swine housing and equipment handbook, MWPS-8. Ames, Iowa: Midwest Plan Service; 1988
  42. Korthals RL, Christianson LL, Muehling AJ. Assessing and improving environmental conditions in commercial swine facilities, Proceedings of International Livestock Environment Symposium III, Ontario, Canada, 2527 April. ASAE; 1988
  43. Robertson JH, Frieben WR. Microbial validation of ven filters. Biotechnol Bioeng 1984; 26: 828-835 https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260260803
  44. Robertson JF. Dust and ammonia concentrations in pig housing: the need to reduce maximum exposure limits. Proceedings of International Livestock Environment Symposium IV, Warwick. England, 6-9 July. ASAE; 1993. p. 694-700