References
- 건강보험심사평가원. 제왕절개분만 요양 급여 적정성 평가보고서. 2002: 24
- Lee SI, Khang YH, Lee MS. Women' s attitudes toward mode of delivery in South Korea-A society with high cesarean section rates. Birth 2004; 31(2): 108-116 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00288.x
- Graham WJ, Hundley V, McCheyne AL, Hall MH, Gurney E, Milne J. An investigation of women's involvement in the decision to delivery by caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 213-220 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08233.x
- Wilkinson C, Mcllwaine G, Boultion-Joncs C, Cole S. Is a rising caesarean section rate inevitable? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 45-52 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09349.x
- Jackson NV, Irvine LM, The influence of maternal request on the elective caesarean section rate. J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 18: 115-119 https://doi.org/10.1080/01443619867812
- Mould TAJ, Chong S, Spencer JAD, Gallivan S. Women's involvement with the decision preceding their caesarean section and their degree of satisfaction. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 1074-1077 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09585.x
- Flamm BL. The patient who demands cesarean delivery. In: flamm BL, Quilligan EJ, eds. Cesarean section: Guidelines for appropriate utilization. New York: Springer-Verlag 1995: 207-221
- World Health Organization. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985: 11: 436-437
- 국민건강보험공단. 2002년 제왕절개분만 실태분석. 2002
- Menacker F, Curtin S. Trends in cesarean birth and vaginal birth after previous cesarean, 1991-99. National Vital Statistics Report. 2001
- Aron DC, Harper DL, Shepardson LB, Rosenthal GE, Impact of risk-adjusting cesarean delivery rates when reporting hospital performance. JAMA 1998; 279: 1968-1972 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.279.24.1968
- Bailit JL, Dooley SL, Peaceman AN. Risk adjustment for interhospital comparison of primary cesarean rates. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 1025-1030 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00536-5
- Elliott JP. Russell MM, Dickason LA. The labor-adjusted cesarean section rate. A more infonuative method than the cesarean section rate for assessing a practitioner' s labor and delivery skill. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 139-143 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70452-6
- Keeler EB, Park RE, Bell RM, Gifford DS, Keesey J. Adjusting cesarean delivery roles for case mix. Health Serv Res 1997; 32(4): 511-528
- Kritchevsky SB, Braun BI, Gross PA, Newcomb CS, Kelleher CA, Simmons BP. Definition and adjustment of cesarean section roles and assessments of hospital performance, Intern J Qual Health Care 1999; 11(4): 283-291 https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/11.4.283
- Lieberman E, Lang JM, Heffner LJ, Cohen A. Assessing the role of case mix in cesarean delivery roles. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 92(1): 1-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(98)00113-6
- Lee S, Khang Y, Ha B, Lee M, Kang W, Koo H, Kim C. Inter-hospital comparison of cesarean section rates after risk adjustment. Korean J Prev Med 2001,34(4). 337-346 (Korean)
- Koroukian, SM, Trisel, B, & Rimm, AA. Estimating the proportion of unnecessary cesarean sections in Ohio using birth certificate date. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51(12): 1327-1334 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00125-5
- Kozinszky Z, Orvos H, Zoboki T, Katona M, Wayda K, Pal A, Kovacs L. Risk factors for cesarean section of primiparous women aged over 35 Years. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2002; 81: 313-316 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0412.2002.810406.x
- Rabillout M, Ecochard R, Guilhot J, Toselli A, Mahriez IC, Matillon Y. Study of the Variations of the cesarean sections rate in the Rhone-Alpes region(France): effect of women and maternity service characteristics, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1998; 78: 11-17 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-2115(97)00277-7
- A joint project of the pennsylvania health care cost contrastment council(PHC4) and the pennsylvania department of health. c-section deliveries in pennsylvania, 1999. 2002
- Jezzoni LI. Risk adjustment for measuring healthcare outcomes, 2nd ed. Chicago, Illinois: Health Administration Press: 1997, 331-363
- Park H. Assessment of severity adjustment measures for AMl patient, in Korea. J Korean Soc Qual Assur Health Care 2003, 10(2): 164-175 (Korean)
- Iezzoni LI. Assessing quality using administrative data. Ann Intern Med 1997: 127(8): 666-674 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-8_Part_2-199710151-00048
- Iezzoni LI. Risk adjustment for measuring healthcare outcomes, 2nd ed. Chicago, lllinois: Health Administration Press: 1997,349
- Iezzoni LI. The Risk of risk adjustment. JAMA 1997;278(19): 1600-1607 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.278.19.1600