Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

  • 제38권1호
  • /
  • Pages.82-92
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 1975-8375(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-4521(eISSN)
대한예방의학회 (The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine)
권호 표지

단계적 행위변화 모형을 이용한 자궁경부암 검진행위 관련 요인 분석 - 국가 조기 암검진 대상자들을 중심으로 -

Analysis of Behavioral Stage in Pap Testing by Using Transtheoretical Model

  • 이혜진 (이화여자대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 정상혁 (이화여자대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 신해림 (국립암센터 암역학관리연구부) ;
  • 오대규 (질병관리본부) ;
  • 이선희 (이화여자대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실)
  • Lee, Hye-Jean (Department of Preventive Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Sang-Hyuk (Department of Preventive Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Hai-Rim (Division of Cancer Control & Epidemiology, National Cancer Center Research Institute) ;
  • Oh, Dae-Kyu (Korean Center for Disease Control & Prevention) ;
  • Lee, Sun-Hee (Department of Preventive Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine)
  • 발행 : 2005.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective : To evaluate the relationships among sociodemographic characteristics, health behaviors, levels of pros and cons and stages of change in Pap testing for uterine cervical cancer. Methods : A questionnaire survey was performed on 560 randomly sampled people who were assigned to participate in a Pap testing program by the National Cancer Screening Project in 2003' between 25 September and 10 October in Gyeonggi, Korea. Data about the behaviors and intentions of Pap testing, sociodemographic characteristics, health behaviors, and levels of acknowledged benefit (pros) and barrier (cons) for Pap testing was collected. The stages of change were grouped according to behaviors and intentions of Pap testing as passive, active, and relapse. Results : Logistic analysis between the passive and active groups showed that city dwellers, 'high' and 'middle' groups in terms of the individual s health belief, those who had undergone a health examination within the past 2 years, and those who had undergone hormone replacement therapy had a higher odds ratios to be in the active group. As the 'benefit' scores increased and the 'Unnecessity' scores decreased, the probabilities to be in the active group increased. According to the logistic analysis results between the active and relapse groups, those who were 60 years or older, members of the National Heath Insurance, and those who had not undergone a health examination within the past 2 years had a higher odds ratio to be in the relapse group. The 'Benefit' scores were not significant in this relationship. The probabilities of being in the relapse group increased as the Unnecessity and 'Shamefulness' scores increased. Conclusions : In conclusion, health planners should inform women in the passive group of the benefits and necessity of Pap testing. It would be better to reduce the barriers to the active group of undergoing Pap smear. This study might be a useful guide for future planning of Pap testing program.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 통계청. 2002년 사망원인통계결과. 2003
  2. 보건복지부. 한국중앙암등록 사업 연례 보고서. 2003
  3. Spjut HJ, Fechner RE. Cytologic diagnosis of cervical dysplasia and carcinoma in situ. Clini Obstet Gynecol 1967; 10(4): 785 https://doi.org/10.1097/00003081-196712000-00003
  4. Lee BK, Choi IJ, Lee YB, Kim DS. A Correlatve study of cytologic and histopathologic features of the uterine cervical lesions. Korean J Obstetr Gynecol 1975; 18(7): 645-658 (Korean)
  5. Laara E, Day NE, Hakama M. Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with organised screening programmes. Lancet 1987; 1(8544): 1247-1249
  6. Sigurdsson K. Effect of organized screening on the risk of cervical cancer: evaluation of screening activity in Iceland, 1964-1991. Int J Cancer 1993; 54(4): 563-570
  7. Ministry of health and welfare. 2001 National health and nutrition survey -overview-. 2002
  8. Kim KM, Lee SH, Kim YC, Kim KS, Shin HC. Predictive factors influencing women to take camcer screening test in a local area. J Korean Acad Fam Med 1996; 17(12): 1442-1449 (Korean)
  9. Koh KW, Lee DH, Lee YH, Sohn HS. A study on knowledge and attitude about uterine cervical screening and its utilization among women in a district of Busan city. J Korean So Maternal & Child Health 2002; 6(1): 93-105
  10. Song MS, Chun KH, Song HJ. Breast and cervical cancer screening Practice of women in Suwon city. Korean J Health Policy Adm 1999; 9(1): 139-155 (Korean)
  11. Kim HL, Kim HS. A study of Pap smear screening for cervical cancer prevention of women and follow-up for recall in Cheju city. J Korean Public Health Asso 2000; 26(3): 276-281
  12. Shin HC. Social and behavioral predictors of cervical cancer screening practices among Korean women. J Korean Acad Fam Med 2001; 22(12): 1823-1837 (Korean)
  13. Kasl SV, Cobb S. Health behavior, Illness behavior, Sick role behavior. Arc Environ Health 1966; 12(2): 246-266 https://doi.org/10.1080/00039896.1966.10664365
  14. Becker MH, Drachman RH, Kirscht JP. A new approach to explaining sick-role behavior in low income populations. Am J Public Health, 1974; 64(3): 205-216 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.64.3.205
  15. Becker MH, Maiman LA. Socio-behavioral determinants of compliance with health and medical care recommendations. Med Care 1975; 13(1): 10-24 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-197501000-00002
  16. Lierman LM, Kaspryzyk D, Young H, Powell- Dope G. Analysis of theoretical models. Paper presented at the Wetern Society for Research in nursing Conference, SanDiego. 1989
  17. Rakowski W, Anderson MR, Stoddard AM, Urban N, Rimer BK, Lane DS, Fox SA, Costanza ME. Confirmatory Analysis of Opinions Regarding the Pros and Cons of Mammography. Health Psychol 1997; 16(5):433-441 https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.16.5.433
  18. Astroth DB, Cross-Poline GN, Stach DJ, Tilliss TS, Anan SD. The Transtheoretical Model: An approach to behavioral change. J Den Hyg 2002; 76(4): 286-295
  19. Rakowski W, Fulton JP, Feldman JP. Women􀁳s Decision Making About Mammography: A Replication of the Relationship Between Stages of Adoption and Decisional Balance. Health Psychol 1993; 12(3): 209-214 https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.12.3.209
  20. DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO. Self change and therapy change of smoking behavior: a comparison of processes of change in cessation and maintenance. Addic Behav 1982; 7(2):133-142 https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4603(82)90038-7
  21. Spencer L, Pagell F, Hallion ME, adams TB. Applying the transtheoretical model to tobacco cessation and prevention: a review of literature. Am J Health Promot 2002; 17(1): 7-71 https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-17.1.7
  22. Carbonari JP, DiClemente CC. Using transtheoretical model profiles to differentiate levels of alcohol abstinence success. J Consul Clini Psychol 2000; 68(5): 810-817 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.5.810
  23. Marshall SJ, Biddle SJ. The transtheoretical model of behavior change: a meta-analysis of application to physical activity and exercise. Ann Behav Med 2001; 23(4): 229-246 https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2304_2
  24. Sarkin JA, Johnson SS, Prochaska JO, Prochaska JM. Applying the transtheoretical model to regular moderate exercise in an overweight population: validation of a stages of change measure. Pre Med 2001; 33(5): 462-469 https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2001.0916
  25. Bowen AM, Williams M, McCoy HV, McCoy CB. Crack smokers' intention to use condoms with loved partners in intervention development using the theory of reasoned actions, condoms beliefs, and processes of change. AIDS Care 2001; 13(5): 579-594 https://doi.org/10.1080/09540120120063214
  26. Marcus BH, Simikin LR, Rossi JS, Pinto BM. Longitudinal shifts in employee's stages and processes of exercise behavior change. Am J Health Promo 1996; 10(3): 195-200 https://doi.org/10.4278/0890-1171-10.3.195
  27. Rakowski W, Clark MA, Pearlman DN, Ehrich B, Rimer BK, Goldstein MG, Dube CE, Woolverton H. Integrating Pros and Cons for Mammography and Pap Testing: Extending the Construct of Decisional Balance to Two Behaviors. Prev Med 1997; 26: 664-673 https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1997.0188
  28. Kelaher M, Gillespie AG, Allotey P, Manderson L, Potts H, Sheldrake M, Young M. The Transtheoretical model and cervical screening: its application among culturally diverse communities in Queensland. Aust Ethn Health 1999; 4(4): 259-276 (Korean) https://doi.org/10.1080/13557859998047
  29. Park YJ, Chang SK, Kang HC. Assessing Decisional Balance toward Mammography Screening in Korean Women. J Korean Acad Nurs 2001; 31(7): 1174-1180 https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2001.31.7.1174
  30. Burbank PM, Reibe D, Padula CA, Nigg C. Exercise and older adults: changing behavior with the transtheoretical model. Orthope Nurs 2002; 21(4): 51-63
  31. Valdez A, Banerjee K, Ackerson L, Fernandez M, Otereo-Sabogal R.,Somkin CP. Correlateds of breast cancer screening among low income, low-education latinas. Prev Med 2001; 33: 495-502 https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.2001.0913
  32. Suarez L, Roche RA, Nichols D. Simpson, DM. Knowledge, behavior, and fears concerning breast and cervical cancer among older low-income Mexican -American women. Am J Prev Med 1997; 13(2): 137-142 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(18)30211-3
  33. Lee SH, Shin HR, Choi KS, Park EC, Kim JB, Lee HJ. Evaluation on performance of National Cancer Screening Program. Ewha Womans University 2003
  34. Shin YJ, Park NH, Kim SK, Choi BY. A KAP study on Hepatitis B among high school girl. J Korean Pub Health Assoc 1995; 21(2): 76-89 (Korean)
  35. Kim JH. Secondary prevention health behavior on cervical cancer in Korea. J Korean Soc Health Educa 1998; 15(1): 165-178 (Korean)
  36. Kim YB, Ro WN, Lee WC, Park YM, Meng KH. The influence factors on cervical and breast cancers screening behavior of women in a city. J Korean Soc Health Edu Promo 2000; 17(1): 1-16 (Korean)
  37. Kim YB, Lee WC, Kim M, Chung CK. The predictive factors to participation in cervical cancer screening program. Koran J Prev Med 2001; 34(3): 237-234 (Korean)
  38. Thompson B, Coronado GD, Solomon CC, McClerran DF, Neuhouser ML, Feng Z. Cancer prevention behavior and socioeconomic status among hispanics and non-hispanic whites in a rural population in the united states. Cancer Causes Control 2002; 13(8): 719-728 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020280427712