References
- Li DH, Liu BL, Zou JC, Xu KW. Improvement of osseointegration of titanium dental implants by a modified sandblasting surface treatment: An in vivo interfacial biomechanics study. Implant Dent 1999:8: 289-294 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199903000-00014
- Sykaras N, Lacopino AM, Marker VA. Triplett RG, Woody RD. Implant materials, designs, and surface topographies: their effect on osseointegration. A literature review. Int J Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 675-690
- Letic-Gavrilovic A. Scandurra R. Abe K. Genetic potential of interfacial guided osteogenesis in implant devices. Dental Materials Journal. 2000: 19(2): 99-132 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.19.99
- Giavaresi G, Fini M. Cigada A. Chiesa R. Rondelli G, Rimondini L, Torricelli P, Aldini NN, Giardino R. Mechanical and histomorphometric evaluations of titanium implants with different surface treatments inserted in sheep cortical bone. Biomaterials 2003: 24: 1583-1594 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00548-3
- Davies JE. Machanisms of endosseous integtation. Int J Prosthodont 1998: 11: 391-401
- Parr GR. Gardner LK, Toth RW. Titanium: The mystery metal of implant dentistry. Dental materials aspects. The journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1985:54(3): 410-414 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90562-1
- Larsson C. Thomsen P, Aronsson BO, Rodahl M, Lausmaa J, Kasemo B, Ericson LE. Bone response to surface-modified titanium response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. Biomaterials 1996: 17(6): 605-615 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(96)88711-4
- Moberg LE. Kondell PA. Sagulin GB, Bolin A. Heimdahl A. Gynther GW. Branemark System and ITI Dental Implant System for treatment of mandibular edentulism. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2001: 12: 450-461. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120504.x
- Klokkevold PR. Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997: 8: 442-447 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080601.x
- Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Linghe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Impl Dent and Relat Res 2000; 2(3): 120-128 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00002.x
-
Onur MA. Cehreli MC, Tas Z, Sahin S. Effect of machined/turned,
$TiO_2$ -blasted and sandblasted/acid-etched titanium oral implant surfaces on nerve conduction: A study on isolated rat sciatic nerves. J Biomed Mater Res 2003: Part B: Appl Biomater 67B: 772-778 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.10064 - Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998: 40: 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-Q
- Li D. Ferguson SJ, Beutler T, Cochran DL, Sittig C, Hirt HP, Buser D. Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002; 60: 325-332 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10063
-
Ivanoff CJ, Hallgren C, Widmark G, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of the bone integration of
$TiO_2$ blasted and turned titanium micro-implants in humans. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2001: 12: 128-134 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002128.x - Rocci A. Martignoni M, Burgos PM, Gottlow J, Sennerby L. Histology of retrieved immediately and early loaded oxidized implants: light microscopic observations after 5 to 9 months of loading in the posterior mandible. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2003; 5(Suppl 1): 88-98 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00020.x
- Ericsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H, Norton MR. A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dentalimplants. Clin Oral Impl Res 1994; 5: 202-206 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1994.050402.x
-
Mustafa K, Wroblewski J, Hultenby K, Silva Lopez B, Arvidson K. Effects of titanium surfaces blasted with
$TiO_2$ particles on the initial attachment of cells derived from human mandibular bone. Clin Oral Impl Res 2000: 11: 116-128 - Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, Hoffmann B, Lussi A. Steinemann SG. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004; 87(3) :529-533
- Ivanoff CJ. Widmark G. Johansson C, Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003: 18: 341-348
- Degidi M, Petrone G, Iezzi G. Piattelli A. Histologic evaluation of a human immediately loaded titanium implant with a porous anodized surface. Clin Impl Dent Relat Res 2002: 4(2): 110-114 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00160.x
- Glauser R, Portmann M, Ruhstaller P, Lundgren AK. Hammerle C. Gottlow J. Stability measurements of immediately loaded machined and oxidized implants in the posterior maxillal A comparative clinical study using resonance frequency analysis). Applied Osseointegration Research. 2001: 2(1): 27-29
- Glauser R, Gottlow J. Lundgren AK, Sennerby L, Portmann M, Ruhstaller P. Hammerle C. Immediate occlusal loading of Branemark Mk IV TiUnite implant placed in bone quality type 4. Applied Osseointegration Research 2002: 3(1): 22-24
- Friberg B. Billstrom C. Preliminary results of a prospective multicenter clinical study on TiUnite implants. Applied Osseointegration Research 2002: 3(1): 29-31
- Rocci A. Martignoni M, Sennerby L. Gottlow J. Immediate loading of a Branemark System implant with the TiUnite surface. Histological evaluation after 9 months. Applied Osseointegration Research 2002: 3(1): 25-28
- Salata L. Rasmusson L, Novaes A. Papalexiou V, Sennerby L. The influence of anodic oxidation on implant integration and stability in bone defects. An RFA study in the dog mandible. Applied Osseointegration Research 2002: 3(1): 32-34
- Glauser R, Lundgren AK, Gottlow J, Sennerby L, Portmann M, Ruhstaller P, Hammerle C. Immediate occlusal loading of Branemark TiUnite implants placed predominantly in soft bone: 1-year results of a prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003: 5 (1) Suppl: 47-56
- Olsson M, Urde G, Andersen JB, Sennerby L. Early loading of maxillary fixed cross-arch dental prostheses supported by six or eight oxidized titanium implants: Results after 1 year of loading, case series. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2003: 5(1) Suppl: 81-87 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00019.x
- Son WW, Zhu XL, Shin HI. Ong JL, Kim KH. In vivo histological response to anodized and anodized /hydrothermally treated titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res Part B; 2003; Appl Biomater 66B: 520-525
- Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Roser K. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Oxidized implants and their influence on the bone response. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2001; 12: 1025-1031 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012837905910
- Sul YT, Johansson CB, Kang Y, Jeon DG, Albrektsson T. Bone reactions to oxidized titanium implants with electrochemical anion sulphuric acid and phosphoric acid incorporation. Clin Impl Dent Relat Res 2002: 4(2): 78-87 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00156.x
- Sul YT. The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 3893-3907 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00261-8
- Liang B, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Taumra J, Kim HM, Uchida M, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Hisological and mechanical investigation of the bone-bonding ability of anodically oxidized titanium in rabbits. Biomaterials 2003: 24: 4959-4966 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00421-6