Journal of Chest Surgery

  • 제38권5호
  • /
  • Pages.371-376
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 2765-1606(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-1614(eISSN)
대한심장혈관흉부외과학회 (The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery)
권호 표지

원발성 자연 공기가슴증 환자에서 고식적인 흉강경하 쐐기절제술과 흉강경을 이용한 변형된 소절개술식의 비교

Comparison of Conventional Thoracoscopic Wedge Resection and Modified Transaxillary Minithoracotomy with Thoracoscopy for the Treatment of Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax

  • 이미경 (원광대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 류대웅 (원광대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 이삼윤 (원광대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 최종범 (원광대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 최순호 (원광대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실)
  • Lee Mi Kyoung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine) ;
  • Ryu Dae Woong (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee Sam Youn (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi Jong Bum (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine) ;
  • Choi Soon Ho (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine)
  • 발행 : 2005.05.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

배경: 저자는 원발성 자연 공기가슴증 환자에서 고식적인 비디오흉강경하 쐐기절제술이 흉강경을 이용한 변형된 소절개술식보다 우수한가를 결정할 목적으로 후향적으로 연구를 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 원발성 자연 공기가슴증을 보인 $14\~35$세 사이의 160명의 환자를 대상으로 하였다. 환자는 수술기법과 수술 접근법에 의해서 고식적인 흉강경하 쐐기절제술군(A군: 80예)과 흉강경을 이용한 변형된 소절개술식을 이용한 군(B군: 80예)으로 분류하였다. 모든 환자에서 술 후 늑막강 첨부의 찰과상과 탈크 도포를 수행하였다. 이 연구는 수술시간, 수술 후 사용한 진통제의 사용일수, 수술 첫날 공기누출이 없는 수, 흉관 삽관일과 병원 입원일, 그리고 술 후 합병증, 추적기간 동안의 만성 흉통과 일상생활로 복귀할 때까지의 기간 그리고 또한 추적기간 동안에 수술동측에서의 재발을 평가하였다. 결과: 양 군사이에서 연구한 평가요소 중 어느 것에서도 의의 있는 차이는 없었다. 결론: 고식적인 비디오 흉강경하 쐐기절제술과 흉강경을 이용한 변형된 소절개술식은 원발성 자연 공기가슴증 환자의 수술적 치료에 있어서 유사한 결과를 야기하였다. 합병증의 발생률도 낮고, 통각도 장기 추적동안에 받아들일 만 하였다. 따라서 흉강경을 이용한 변형된 소절개술식 또한 가치 있는 대체수술 기법으로 보인다.

Background: Retrospective study was carried out on patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax with the aim of determining if conventional thoracoscopic wedge resection is superior to modified transaxillary minithoracotomy with thoracoscopy in the surgical treatment. Material and Method: 160 patients, aged 14 to 35 years with primary spontaneous pneumothorax were involved in this study. Patients were assigned to two groups by surgical technique; Conventional thoracoscopic wedge resection (group A; n=80) and modified transaxillary minithoracotomy with thoracoscopy (group B; n=80). Apical pleural abrasion & talc poudrage were performed in all cases. This study evaluated the following factors: duration of operation, days of analgesics used after operation, number of no air leak on the first postoperative day, duration of indwelling chest tube, hospital stay, postoperative complications, chronic chest pain (during follow-up) and resumption of normal activity. Relapses (ipsilateral recurrence after discharge) during follow-up periods were evaluated. Result: No significant differences were found in any of the factors studied in either group. Conclusion: Conventional thoracoscopic wedge resection and modified transaxillary minithoracotomy with thoracoscopy offer similar results in the surgical treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. The rate of complication is low and the level of pain is acceptable without long-term sequele. Therefore, modified transaxillary minithoracotomy with thoracoscopy method appears as a valuable alternative surgical technique.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Tyson MD, Crandall WB. The surgical treatment of recurrent idiopathic spontaneous pneumothorax. J Thorac Surg 1941;10:566-8
  2. Deslauriers J, Beaulieu M, Despres JP, Lemieux M, Leblanc J, Desmeules M. Transaxillary pleurectomy for treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Surg 1980;30:569-74 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(10)61733-X
  3. Levi JF, Kleinman P, Riquet M, Debesse B. Percutaneous parietal pleurectomy for recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax. Lancet 1990;336:1577-8
  4. Yamaguchi A, Shinonaga M, Tatebe S, Souma T, Tsuchida M, Saito A. Thoracoscopic stapled bullectomy supported by suturing. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:691-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(93)90954-G
  5. Inderbitzi RG, Leiser A, Furrer M, Althaus U. Three year's experience in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for spontaneous pneumothorax. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:1410-5
  6. Loic LL, Olivier C, Pierre-Mathieu B, Francois P, Rene J. Videothoracoscopic bleb excision and pleural abrasion for the treatment primary spontaneous pneumothorax: long-term results. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:960-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04544-7
  7. Kim YG, Choi HH, Yang HW, Lee SY, Choi JB. Stapling and suturing of blebs and bulla without excision in thoracic surgery. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;31:995-8
  8. Kim YS, Sohn DS. Analysis of high-resolution CT findings in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax. Korean J Thorac cardiovasc Surg 1999;32:383-7
  9. Waller DA, Forty J, Morritt GN. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy for spontaneous pneumothorax. Ann thorac Surg 1994;58:372-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(94)92210-1
  10. Cole FH Jr, Cole FH, Khandekar A, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery: primary therapy for spontaneous pneumothorax? Ann thorac Surg 1995;60:931-3
  11. Kim KH, Kim HK, Han JY, Kim JT, Won YS, Choi SS. Transaxillary minithoracotomy versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1510-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(96)00113-0
  12. Dumont P, Diemont F, Massard G, et al. Does a thoracoscopic approach for surgical treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax represent progress? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;11:27-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(96)01021-4
  13. L JS. Clinical study after video-assisted thoracic surgery and mid-axillary thoracotomy for recurrent spontaneous pneumothorax. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;32:43-8
  14. Jimenez-Merchan R, Garcia-Diaz F, Arenas-Linares C, et al. Comparative retrospective study of surgical treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. Surg Endosc 1997;11:919-23 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900487
  15. Kim MS, Kim YT, Kim KB, Kim WG, Seong SW, Ahn H. Comparison of VATS with thoracotomy for the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;32:294-8
  16. Miller JD, Simone C, Kahnamoui K, et al. Comparison of videothoracoscopy and axillary thoracotomy for the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. Am Surg 2000;66:1014-5
  17. Jorge LF, Emilio C, Gabriel J, et al. Axillary thoracotomy versus videothoracoscopy for the treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:417-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.11.038
  18. Lee SW, Lee KS, Jung JA, Kum DU, Ahn JT, Lee JW. Clinical analysis of spontaneous pneumothorax-comparison of VATS versus limited thoracotomy. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;31:369-73
  19. Mack MJ, Hazelrigg SR, Landreneau RJ, Naunheim KS. The first international symposium on thoracoscopic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:686-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(93)90952-E
  20. Horio H, Normori H, Fuyuno G, et al. Limited axillary thoracotomy vs video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax. Surg Endosc 1988;12:1155-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900805
  21. Naunheim KS, Mack MJ, Hazelrigg SR, et al. Safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgical techniques for the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:1198-204 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70203-2
  22. Marc M, Farid G, Barbara T, Gregory DT, Nevin MK. Video-assisted thoracic surgical treatment of initial spontaneous pneumothorax in young patients. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc 2003;76:1661-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04816-6