Primary Culture and Characteristics of Blood-Brain Barrier Endothelial Cells from Rat Brain Microvessel

쥐의 뇌 미세혈관 내피세포를 이용한 뇌혈관장벽 내피세포의 배양과 특성

  • Lee, Hee-Sang (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kim, Seok-Jung (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kim, Dae-Jin (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Chung, Yoon-Hee (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Su (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Lee, Won-Bok (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Yong (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University)
  • 이희상 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 김석중 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 김대진 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 정윤희 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 김성수 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 이원복 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실) ;
  • 김경용 (중앙대학교 의과대학 해부학교실)
  • Published : 2005.12.01

Abstract

The characteristics of primary cultured rat brain microvessel endothelial cells (RBMECs) were studied using microscopy, immunohistochemistry and measuring of transendothelial electrical resistance (TER). The RBMECs formed a monolayer by $5{\sim}6$ days after plating and showed characteristics of whirling appearance. The TER increased until day 5 and decreased then. There was few immunoreaction with anti-GFAP, anti-GalC, anti-neurofilament 160/200 kD antibodies. So the contamination of astrocyte, oligodendrocyte, and neuron. could be ruled out.. Immunoreaction to vWF antigen was widespread througout the cytoplasm as Weibel-Palade granule. Immunoreaction to tight junction proteins, i.e. occludin, ZO-1, and ZO-2 was seen at cell contact. In summary, RBMECs isolated and cultured showed morphological, immunohistochemical and electrical characteristics of blood-brain barrier (BBB). The in vitro BBB model can be used in studying characteristics of in vivo BBB.

쥐의 뇌로부터 미세혈관에서 분리하고 배양한 내피세포의 특성을 현미경관찰, 면역염색과 전기저항을 측정해 관찰하였다. 미세혈관 내피세포는 배양 후 $5{\sim}6$일 경에 단층을 형성하였으며 특징적으로 소용돌이치는 모양을 나타냈다. 내피세포 단층의 전기저항은 배양 후 5일 경까지 따라 증가하였고 이후로는 감소하였다. 면역형광염색에서 anti-GFAP, anti-GalC, anti-neurofilament 160/200 kD antibody에 대한 면역반응을 거의 찾아볼 수 없었어 별아교세포, 희소돌기아교세포 및 신경세포에 의한 우려할 만한 오염은 배제할 수 있었다. vWF 항원에 대한 면역반응은 내피세포의 세포질에 Weibel-Palade 과립이 전반적으로 퍼져 있었다. 치밀이음부를 구성하는 occludin, ZO-1, ZO-2에 대한 면역반응은 내피세포의 접촉부위에서 매우 특징적으로 나타나고 있었다. 요약하면 쥐의 뇌 미세혈관 내피세포를 분리, 배양하여 형태학적, 조직면역 화학적 방법과 전기저항을 측정하여 내피세포의 특성을 확인하였다. 이 생체외 혈액뇌장벽 모델은 앞으로 진행될 액뇌장벽의 특징을 규명하고자 하는 시험관내 실험에 유용하게 이용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Abbott NJ, Hughes CC, Revest PA, Greenwood J: Development and characterization of a rat brain capillary endothelial culture: towards an in vitro blood-brain barrier. J Cell Sci 103 : 23-37, 1992
  2. Audus KL, Bartel RL, Hidalgo IJ, Borchardt RT: The use of cultured epithelial and endothelial cells for drug transport and metabolic studies. Pharm Res 7 : 435-451, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015800312910
  3. Audus KL, Borchardt RT: Characterization of an in vitro blood-brain barrier model system for studying drug transport and metabolism. Pharm Res 3 : 81-87, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016337202335
  4. Audus KL, Borchardt RT: Bovine brain microvessel endothelial cell monolayers as a model system for blood-brain barrier. Ann NY Acad Sci 507 : 9-18, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1987.tb45787.x
  5. Batter DK, Corpina RA, Roy C, Spray DC, Hertzberg EL, Kessler JA: Heterogeneity in gap junction expression in astrocytes cultured from different brain regions. Glia 6 : 213-221, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.440060309
  6. Bowman PD, Betz AL, Ar D, Wolinsky JS, Penney JB, Shivers RR, Goldstein GW: Primary culture of capillary endothelium from rat brain. In Vitro 17 : 353-362, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02618147
  7. Bowman PD, Ennis SR, Rarey KE, Betz AL, Goldstein GW: Brain microvessel endothelial cells in tissue culture: A model for study of blood-brain barrier permeability. Ann Neurol 14 : 396-402, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410140403
  8. Chen Z, Zandonatti M, Jakubouski D, Fox HS: Brain capillary endothelial cells express MBEC1, a protein that is related to the claustridium perfringens enterotoxin receptors, Lab Invest 78 : 353-363, 1998
  9. Cserr HF, Bindgaard M: Blood-brain interfaces in vertebrates: a comprehensive approach. Am J Physiol 246 : R277-R288, 1984
  10. De Bault LE, Kahn LE, Frommes SP, Cancilla PA: Cerebral microvessels and derived cells in tissue culture: isolation and preliminary characterization. In Vitro 15 : 473-487, 1979 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02618149
  11. Dehouck M P, Jolliet Riant P, Bree F, Fruchart J C, Cecchelli R, Tillement JP: Drug transfer across the bloodbrain barier: correlation between in vitro and in vivo models. J Neurochem 58 : 1790-1797, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb10055.x
  12. Demeuse Ph, Kerhofs A, Struys Ponsar C, Knoop B, Remacle C, Aguilar Ph: Compartmentalised coculture of rat brain endothelial cells and astrocyte: a synergistic model to study the blood-brain barrier. J Neurosci Methods 121 : 21-31, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0270(02)00225-X
  13. Eddy EP, Maleef BE, Hart TK, Smith PL: In vitro models to predict blood-brain barrier permeability. Adv Drug Del Rev 23 : 185-198, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(96)00435-8
  14. Fisher D, Kissel T: Histochemical characterization of primary capillary endothelial cells from brains using monoclonal antibodies and fluorescein isothiocyanate-labelled lectins: implications for drug delivery. Eur J Pharmapeut Biopharm 52 : 1-11, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0939-6411(01)00159-X
  15. Grabb PA, Gilbert MR: Neoplastic and pharmacological influence on the permeability of an in vitro blood-brain barrier. J Neurosurg 82 : 1053-1058, 1995 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1995.82.6.1053
  16. Greenwood J: Astrocytes, cerebral endthelium and cell culture: the persuit of an in vitro blood-brain barrier organ. Ann NY Acad Sci 633 : 426-430, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb15632.x
  17. Joo F: Endothelial cell of brain and other organ system: some similarities and differences, Progr Neurobiol 48 : S35-S37, 1993
  18. Male DK, Pryce G, Rahman J: Comparison of the immunological properties of rat cerebral and aortic endothelium, J Neuroimmunol 30 : 290-295, 1990
  19. Meresse S, Dehouck M P, Delorme P, Bensaid M, Tauber JP, Delbart C, Fruchart J C, Ceccelli R: Bovine brain endothelial cells express tight junctions and monoamine oxidase activity in long-term culture. J Neurochem 53 : 1363-1371, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1989.tb08526.x
  20. Panula P, Joo F, Rechardt L: Evidence for the presence of viable endothelial cells in culture derived from dissociated rat brain. Experimentia 34 : 95-97, 1978 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01921925
  21. Reese TS, Karnovsky MJ: Fine structural localization of a blood-brain barrier to exogenous peroxidase. J Cell Biol 34 : 207-217, 1967 https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.34.1.207
  22. Shi F, Audus KL: Biochemical characterisitics of primary and passaged cultures of primate brain microvessel endothelial cells. Neurochem Res 19 : 427-433, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00967320
  23. Szabo CA, Deli MA, Ngo Thi Khue, Joo F: Production of pure primary rat endothelial cell culture; a comparison of different method. Neurobiol 5 : 1-16, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1002/neu.480050102
  24. Takasato Y, Rapoport SI, Smith QR: An in situ brain perfusion technique to study cerebrovascular transport in the rat. Am J Physiol 247 : H484-H493, 1984