The Influence of Fixation Rigidity on Intervertebral Joints - An Experimental Comparison between a Rigid and a Flexible System

  • Kim, Won-Joong (Departments of Orthopedic Surgery, Wooridul Spine Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Ho (Departments of Neurosurgery, Wooridul Spine Hospital) ;
  • Shin, Song-Woo (Departments of Neurosurgery, Wooridul Spine Hospital) ;
  • Rivard, Charles H. (Department of Neurosurgery, Research Center, St. Justine Hospital) ;
  • Coillard, Christine (Department of Neurosurgery, Research Center, St. Justine Hospital) ;
  • Rhalmi, Souad (Department of Neurosurgery, Research Center, St. Justine Hospital)
  • Published : 2005.05.28

Abstract

Objective: Spinal instrumentation without fusion often fails due to biological failure of intervertebral joints (spontaneous fusion, degeneration, etc). The purpose of this study is to investigate the influence of fixation rigidity on viability of intervertebral joints. Methods: Twenty pigs in growing period were subjected to posterior segmental fixation. Twelve were fixed with a rigid fixation system(RF) while eight were fixed with a flexible unconstrained implant(FF). At the time of the surgery, a scoliosis was created to monitor fixation adequacy. The pigs were subjected to periodic radiological examinations and 12pigs (six in RF, six in FF) were euthanized at 12-18months postoperatively for analysis. Results: The initial scoliotic curve was reduced from $31{\pm}5^{\circ}$ to $27{\pm}8^{\circ}$ in RF group (p=0.37) and from $19{\pm}4^{\circ}$ to $17{\pm}5^{\circ}$ in FF group (p=0.21). Although severe disc degeneration and spontaneous fusion of facet joints were observed in RF group, disc heights of FF group were well maintained without major signs of degeneration. Conclusion: The viability of the intervertebral joints depends on motion spinal fixation. Systems allowing intervertebral micromotion may preserve the viability of intervertebral discs and the facet joint articular cartilages while maintaining a reasonably stable fixation.

Keywords

References

  1. Benzel EC : Spinal Instrumentation. Neurosurgical Topics. New York : American Association of Neurological Surgeons : 1-288, 1994
  2. Bridwell KH, Kuklo TR, Lewis SJ : String test measurement to assess the effect of spinal deformity correction on spinal canal length. Presented at the 35th Annual meeting of the Scoliosis Research Society, Cairns, Australia, October 17-21, 2000
  3. Broom MJ, Jacobs RR : Update-1988. Current status of internal fixation of thoracolumbar fractures. J Orthop Trauma 3 : 148-155, 1898 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-198906000-00010
  4. Dodd CAF, Fergusson CM, Pearcy MJ, Houghton GR : Vertebral motion measured using biplanar radiography before and after Harrington rod removal for unstable thoracolumbar fractures of the spine. Spine 11 : 452-455, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198606000-00011
  5. Fisk JR, Peterson HA, Laughlin R, Lutz R : Spontaneous fusion in scoliosis after instrumentation without arthrodesis. J Pediatr Orthop 15 : 182-186, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-199515020-00010
  6. Holm S, Nachemson A : Variations in the nutrition of the canine intervertebral disc induced by motion. Spine 8 : 866-874, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198311000-00009
  7. Jacobs RR, Casey MP : Surgical management of thoracolumbar spinal injuries. General principles and controversial considerations. Clin Orthop 189 : 22-35, 1984
  8. Kahanovitz N, Arnoczky SP, Levine DB, Otis JP : The effects of internal fixation on the articular cartilage of unfused canine facet joint cartilage. Spine 9 : 268-272, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198404000-00008
  9. Katz MM, Hargens AR, Garfin SR : Intervertebral disc nutrition. Diffusion versus convection. Clin Orthop 210 : 243-245, 1986
  10. Kim KW, Ha KY, Moon MS, Kim YS, Kwon SY, Woo YK : Fate of the facet joints after instrumented intertransverse process fusion. Clin Orthop 36 : 110-119, 1999
  11. Kim WJ, Lee SH, Shin SW, Rivard CH, Coillard C, Rhalmi S : The effect of segmental pedicle screw instrumentation on actively growing spine : A long-term experimental study. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 35 : 502-506, 2004
  12. Klemme WR, Denis F, Winter RB, Lonstein JW, Koop SE : Spinal instrumentation without fusion for progressive scoliosis in young children. J Pediatr Orthop 17 : 734-742, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004694-199711000-00007
  13. Luque ER : Paralytic scoliosis in growing children. Clin Orthop 163 : 202-209, 1982
  14. Mardjetko SM, Hammerberg KW, Lubicky JP, Fister JS : The Luque trolley revisited. Review of nine cases requiring revision. Spine 17 : 582-589, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199205000-00018
  15. Pratt RK, Webb JK, Burwell RG, Fister JS : Luque trolley and convex epiphysiodesis in the management of infantile and juvenile idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 24 : 1538-1547, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199908010-00007
  16. Suk SI, Kim WJ, Kim JH, Lee SM : Restoration of thoracic kyphosis in the hypokyphotic spine : a comparison between multiple-hook and segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord 12 : 489-495, 1999
  17. Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, Chung YJ, Park YB : Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 20 : 1399-1405, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199506020-00012
  18. Vornanen M, Bostman O, Keto P, Myllynen P : The integrity of intervertebral disks after operative treatment of thoracolumbar fractures. Clin Orthop 297 : 150-154, 1993