Preoperative Gadolinium-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Images on Infectious Spondylitis

  • Kim, Seok-Won (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Myoung (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Chosun University) ;
  • Shin, Ho (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Chosun University)
  • Published : 2005.11.28

Abstract

Objective : The purpose of this study is to analyze the patterns of intervertebral disc enhancement seen in infectious spondylitis, differentiate between two groups[tuberculous vs pyogenic spondylitis]. Methods : Between January 1994 and December 2002, 83patients underwent operative procedure with confirmed to histopathologic evaluation. Magnetic resonance[MR] images were obtained in all patients and were analyzed retrospectively. 57patients had tuberculosis and 26patients were infected by pyogens. The patterns of gadolinium enhancement of disc were classified into 4 types[post's classification] : Type I, non-enhancing; Type II, enhancement of the peripheral rim; Type III, Type II with central area and partial endplate; Type IV, general enhancement. Results : The enhancement patterns observed were as follows : Common pattern of tuberculous spondylitis was Type II, and pyogenic spondylitis was Type III. [p < 0.01] This difference may result from pathophysiologic varieties of organisms. Conclusion : Careful preoperative MR analysis of the patterns of disc enhancement occuring in infectious spondylitis can be useful for differentiating between the tuberculous and pyogenic spondylitis.

Keywords

References

  1. Buchelt M, Lack W, Kutschera HP, Katterschafka T, Kiss H, Schneider B, et al : Comparision of tuberculous and pyogenic spondylitis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 296 : 192-199, 1993
  2. Carragee EJ : The clinical use of magnetic resonance imaging in pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. Spine 22 : 780-785, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199704010-00015
  3. Chapman M, Murray RO, Stoker DJ : Tuberculosis of the bones and joints. Semin Roentgenol 14 : 266-282, 1979 https://doi.org/10.1016/0037-198X(79)90024-5
  4. Kang HS, Kyung MY : Differentiation between tuberculous and pyogenic spondylitis : mr imaging characteristics of paraspinal mass. Korean J Radiol 34 : 825-830, 1996 https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.1996.34.6.825
  5. Lee KY, Sohn SK, Hwang KS : Comparison of pyogenic tuberculous spondylitis. J Korean Spine Surg 6 : 443-450, 1999
  6. Post MJ, Sze G, Quencer RM, Eismont FJ, Green BA, Gahbauer H : Gadolinium-enhanced MR in spinal infection. J Comput Assist Tomogr 14 : 721-729, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199009000-00008
  7. Shanley DJ : Tuberculosis of the spine : imaging features. AJR 164 : 659-664, 1995 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.164.3.7863889
  8. Sharif HS : Role of MR imaging in the management of spinal infections. AJR 158 : 1333-1345, 1992 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.158.6.1590137
  9. Sklar EML, Post MJD, Lebwohl NH : Imaging of infection of lumbosacral spine. Neuroimaging 3 : 577-590, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(96)80579-9
  10. Smith AS, Weinstein MA, Mizushima A, Coughlin B, Hayden SP, Lakin MM, et al : MR imaging of characteristics of tuberculous spondylitis vs vertebral osteomyelitis. AJR 153 : 399-405, 1989 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.153.2.399
  11. Thrush A, Enzmann D : MR imaging of infectious spondylitis. AJNR 11 : 1171-1180, 1990
  12. Whee SM, Eoh W, Nam DH, Lee JI, Kim JS, Shin HJ, et al : Clinical evaluation of surgical treatment for ten cases of tuberculous spindylitis. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 30 : 1314-1319, 2001