Use of Single-leaf Cutting in the Study of the Expression of Starch Synthesis and Modification Genes in Sweetpotato

  • Kim Sun-Hyung (Research Institute for Bioresources and Biotechnology, Ishikawa Prefectural University) ;
  • Hamada Tatsuro (Research Institute for Bioresources and Biotechnology, Ishikawa Prefectural University) ;
  • Otani Matoyasu (Research Institute for Bioresources and Biotechnology, Ishikawa Prefectural University) ;
  • Koga Hironori (Research Institute for Bioresources and Biotechnology, Ishikawa Prefectural University) ;
  • Shimada Takiko (Research Institute for Bioresources and Biotechnology, Ishikawa Prefectural University)
  • Published : 2005.06.01

Abstract

The evaluation of source potential and sink strength is the generally large and laborious sample size required to adequately assess anyone of the parameters in field-grown sweetpotato. For this purpose we used the rooted single-leaf cuttings with petioles, because the source and sink organs are restricted in this system. The rooted single-leaf cutting of sweetpotato provides a unique source-sink model system, and is established within about 50 days after planting. In this study, the sink potential of sweetpotato tubers was examined based on the expression of genes for starch synthesis (AGPase) and modification (SBEII and GBSSI) in single rooted leaf plant. The gene expression patterns of GBSSI, SBEII and AGPase at various developmental stages and in different types of root tissues presented. These results suggest that the rooted single-rooted method can be used an ideal model system to study physiological and biochemical mechanisms in sweetpotato.

Keywords

References

  1. Artschwager E (1924) On the anatomy of the sweetpotato root with notes on internal breakdown. J Agr Res 27: 157-166
  2. Fernie AR and Willmitzer L (2001) Molecular and biochemical triggers of potato tuber development. Plant Physiol 127: 1459-1465 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.010764
  3. Fernie AR, Willmitzer L and Trethewey RN (2002) Sucrose to starch: a transition in molecular plant physiology. Trends Plant Sci 7: 35-41 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(01)02183-5
  4. Fujise K and Tsuno Y (1967) The effect of potassium on dry matter production of sweetpotato. In Proceeding of the International Symposium on Tropical Root Crops. Vol. 1. pp. 20-33. Univ. of the West Indies, Trinidad
  5. Hahn SK (1997) A quantitative approach to source potentials and sink capacities among reciprocal grafts of sweetpotato varieties. Crop Sci. 17: 559-562 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1977.0011183X001700040020x
  6. Hozyo Y (1977) The influences of source and sink on plant production of Ipomoea grafts. Jpn Agri Res Quarterly 11: 77-83
  7. Humphries EC (1963) Dependence of net assimilation rate on root growth of isolated leaves. Ann Bot 27: 175-183 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083830
  8. Kato S, Kobayasi Hand Hozyo Y(1972) Translocation of $^{14}C$-photosynthates in isolated sweet potato leaves, Ipomoea batatas Poiret. Proc Crop Sci Soc Jpn 41: 147-154 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.41.147
  9. Kim SH, Mizuno K and Fujimura T (2002a) Isolation of MADS-box genes from sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) expressed specifically in vegetative tissues. Plant and Cell Physiol 43: 314-322 https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcf043
  10. Kim SH, Mizuno T, Sawada Sand Fujimura T (2002b) Regulated expression of ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase and chalcone synthase during root development in sweetpotato. Plant Growth Regul 38: 173-179 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021291616387
  11. Li H, Glyllesten VB, Cui X, Saiki RK, Erlich HA and Arnheim N (1988) Amplification and analysis of DNA sequences in single human sperm and diploid cell. Nature 335: 414-417 https://doi.org/10.1038/335414a0
  12. Li XQ and Zhang D (2003) Gene expression activity and pathway selection for sucrose metabolism in development storage root of sweetpotato. Plant Cell Physiol 44: 630-636 https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcg080
  13. Lowe SB and Wilson LA (1974) Comparative analysis of tuber development in six sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam) cultivars. 1. Tuber initiation, tuber growth and partition of assimilates. Ann Bot 38: 307-317 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084814
  14. McDavid CR and Alamu S (1980) The effect of growth regulators on tuber initiation and growth in rooted leaves of two sweetpotato cultivars. Ann Bot 45: 363-364 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085833
  15. Nakatani M, Oyanagi A and Watanabe Y (1988) Tuber sink potential in sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L). Lam.). Jpn J Crop Sci 57: 535-543 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.57.535
  16. Onwueme IC (1978) Sweeet potato. In The Tropical Tuber Crops. Edited by I.C. Onwueme, pp. 167-195. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester
  17. Oyanagi A, Nakatani M and Watanabe Y (1987) Studies on the factors inducing cracking in tuberous roots of sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L). Lam.). Jpn J Crop Sci 56: 190-197 https://doi.org/10.1626/jcs.56.190
  18. Sawada S, Hayakawa T, Fukushi K and Kasai M (1986) Influence of carbohydrates on photosynthesis in single, rooted soybean leaves used as a source-sink model. Plant Cell Physiol 27: 591-600
  19. Spence JA and Humphries EC (1972) Effect of moisture supply, root temperature, and growth regulators on photosynthesis of isolated rooted leaves of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). Ann Bot 36: 115-121 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084564
  20. Tanaka N, Yamakawa M and Yamashita I (1998) Chara-cterization of transcription of genes involved in hairy root induction on pRil724 core T-DNA in two Ajuga reptans hairy root lines. Plant Sci 137: 95-105 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(98)00123-X
  21. Wilson LA (1982) Tuberization in sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L). Lam.). pp. 79-94 in Sweetpotato, edited by RL Villareal and TD Griggs. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Twainan, Taiwan
  22. Wilson LA and Lowe SB (1973) The anatomy of the root system in west Indian sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L). Lam.) cultivar. Ann Bot 37:633-643 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084729