Development Directions of Service Standards for Senior Congregate Housing

  • Published : 2005.12.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the needs of future users for services at senior congregate housing and to look into the development directions of the service standards for senior congregate housing. A survey was conducted among middle-aged people in their fifties, who lived in Seoul, using the systematic random sampling method. The final sample included 498 respondents. The survey was conducted from November 3, 2003 to November 14, 2003. The results of this study were as follows. Firstly, as the need for housing services were high, it was quite clear that various services at senior congregate housing should be provided. Secondly, a service differentiation strategy should be proposed to meet the characteristics of the users. Thirdly, it was hereby suggested that service standards should be established in the following manner considering the relationship between the needs for services and the income level directly influencing the provision of services: 'Basic services' to be provided regardless of income, 'Optional services' to be selectable among the preferable services per income level, and 'Supportive services' to be provided for low-income people.

Keywords

References

  1. Age Concern (2004). Factsheet 2: Bzrying Retirement Housing
  2. Butler, A., Oldman, C., & Greve, J. (1983). Sheltered Housing for the Elderly: Policy, practice and the consumer. London: Allen & Unwin
  3. Butterfield, D., & Weidemann, S. (1987). Housing satisfaction of the elderly. In V. Regnier and J. Pynoos (Eds), Housing and Aged: Design directives andpolicy considerations (pp. 133- 152). New York: Elsevier
  4. Clapharn, D., & Munro, M. (1988). A Comparision of Sheltered Housing and Amenity Housing for Older People. Edinburgh: Scottish Office
  5. Eckert, J. K., & Murrey, M. I. (1984). Alternative Modes of Living for the Elderly. In I. Altman, M, P, Lawton. & J. E. Wohlwill (Eds). Elderly People and the Environment (pp. 95-128). New York and London : Plenum Press
  6. Free, M. M. (1995). The Private World of the Hermitage: Lifestyles of the Rich and the Old in an Elite Retirement Home. Westport, Connecticut? London: Bergin & Garvey
  7. Hong, H. O. (2001a). Attitudes and preferences about elderly communal housing -focused on developing elderly assisted living in Korea. The Journal of Korean Home Economics, 19(5), 147- 166
  8. Hong, H. O., & Jee, E. Y. (2002). Attitudes and Preferences for Elderly Assisted Living according to socio-economic status. The Joumal of Korean Home Economics, 20(2), 83-95
  9. Hong, H. O., & You, B. S. (2003). Preferences about senior congregate housing by attitudes on work and leisure in later life. The Journal of Korean Home Economics, 21(5), 13-24
  10. Hong, H. O. (2001b). Review of communal housing for the elderly in the U.K. The Journal of Korean Home Economics, 19(4), 49-68
  11. Hong, H. O., & You, B. S. (2003). Developing Orientation of Senior Congregate Housing in Korea-Focused on the opinion of middle aged group in their 50s. Architectural Research, Journal of the Architectural institute of Korea, 5(1), 49-59
  12. Hong, H. O., You, B. S., & Jeon, K. H. (2004). A study on the characteristics of groups selectiong different planned housing alternatives in later life-with focus to levels of work opportunities, leisure activities, and services. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 15(1), 129- 140
  13. Kahn, A. J., & Kamerman, S. B. (1976). Social Services in International Perspectives. DHEW
  14. National Statistical Office of Korea (2003). Statistics of 2002 Social Survey
  15. National Statistical Office of Korea (2005). Special Estimation of Future Population
  16. Oh, C. O., & Lee, Y. S. (1993). Preferred characteristics of elderly housing depending on four aging situations. The Journal of Korean Construction Association, 9(2), 35-45
  17. Pam, J., Greed, S., & Behncke, C. (1988). What people want, why they move, and What happens after they move: A summary of research in rekment housing. Journal of housing for the Elderly, 5(1), 7-33
  18. Randolph Hills Nursing Center (1995). Annual Reports on the Management, Series 2. Wheaton, MD:Randolph Hills Nursing Center
  19. Reynolds, S. G., & Beamish, J. O. (2003). Residential satisfaction of older adults in age-segregated facilities. Housing andSociety, 30(1), 33-50 https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2003.11430481
  20. Sherman, S. R. (1971). The choice of retirement housing among the well elderly. Aging and Human Development, 2,118- 138 https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.2.2.e
  21. Sherman, S. R. (1971). The choice of retirement housing among the well elderly. Aging and Human Development, 2, 1 18-138 https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.2.2.e
  22. You, B. S., & Hong, H. 0. (2005a). A study on determinant factor of intention to move into senior congregate housing. The Journal of Korean Housing Rssociation, 15,387-391
  23. You, B. S., & Hong, H. O. (2005b). A comparison between dependent and independent attitude groups regarding elderly lives and living arrangement. International Journal of Human Ecology, 6(1), 1 17-129
  24. You, Byung-Sun (2005). A Study on the Development of Supply and Management Model for Senior Congregate Housing in Korea. Ph.D. Dissertation KyungHee University
  25. Zeisel, J. (2002). The story of housing old people in north America. International Symposium, Mqy 7, 2002 'Direction of Housing & Service Development in Aging Society', 54-59