Journal of Information Management (정보관리연구)

Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (한국과학기술정보연구원 과학기술정보센터)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Crisis and Alternative in Scholarly Information Communication

학술정보 유통위기 및 해소전략의 해부

  • 윤희윤 (대구대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2005.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The scholarly communication crisis is not a journals crisis, but rather a broader crisis in information communications. It is the loss of access to the scholarly research literature, as the rising cost of STM journal subscriptions far out-strip academic library budgets. Now, the open access as alternatives to traditional journal subscription model are emerging for STM scholarly information. There are basically three forms for OA strategies : Open Access Journals(OAJ), Author Self Archiving(ASA), Academic Institutional Repositories(AIR). This paper describes the current trends and analyses potentially serious limitations and obstacles or various issues of the OA strategies, including the notion of scholarly information as a public good, myths of free access, author pay model, holder of copyright, etc.

현재의 학술 커뮤니케이션 위기는 잡지의 위기가 아니라 정보 유통상의 광범위한 위기이다. 그것은 STM 학술지의 구독비용이 대학도서관의 예산 증가율을 상회함에 따라 학술 및 연구자료의 접근력이 축소되거나 상실되는 것을 의미한다. 그래서 오픈 액세스 잡지(OAJ), 저자 셀프 아카이빙(ASA), 학술기관 레포지터리(AIR)를 전략적 수단으로 하는 오픈 액세스가 대안으로 등장하였다. 이에 본 연구는 오픈 액세스의 최근 동향을 개관하고, OA 전략에 내재된 장애요소와 다양한 현안인 학술정보의 공공재 논쟁, 무료접근의 신화와 한계, 저자의 비용지불 모델, 저작권 귀속문제 등을 분석한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 時賓象-, 2004,オープン了ク七スの動向 “青報管理”, 47(9) : 616-624.
  2. 윤희윤. 2003. 학술지의 디지털 아킬레스건 분석." 한국도서관.정보학회지", 34(4) : 43-66.
  3. 윤희윤. 2004. "OECD 국가의 대학도서관 분석과 시사점". [서울] : 한국교육학술정보원.
  4. 이나니, 김선미. 2004." 기관 레포지터리를 중심으로 한 대학 학술정보 관리방안 연구". [서울] : 한국교육학술정보원.
  5. 이상호, 황혜경, 정경희, 설문원. 2004. "오픈액세스 기반 과학기술 지식정보자원 공유체제 구축에 관한 기초연구". [서울] :한국과학기술정보연구원. KISTI/BB052.
  6. 土屋 伎. 2004. 學術情報流通め最新の動向 : 學術雜誌價格と電子ジャ-ナルの悩ましい將來. “現代の圖書館”, 42(1) : 3-30.
  7. 歲森孰, 宇陀則彦, 松林麻實子, 2004, “電子 情報環境下における科學技術情報の蓄積.流通の在り方に關する調査研究”. 東京:國立國曾圖書館.
  8. Agres, Ted. “NIH Announces 'Open-Access'Rules”. [online]. [cited 2005. 2. 28]. .
  9. Antelman, Kristin. 2004. “Do Open- Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact?”. College and Research Libraries, 65(5) : 372- 382. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.65.5.372
  10. Association of Research Libraries, the ARL Office of Leadership and Management Services, and the Online Computer Library Center, 1999. “The Keystone Principles”. 1999 ARL/OCLC Strategic Issues Forum . [online]. [cited 2005. 2. 28]. .
  11. Association of Research Libraries. 2004a. ARL Statistics 2002-2003. Washington, D.C. : ARL.
  12. Association of Research Libraries. 2004b. ARL Supplementary Statistics 2002-2003. Washington, D.C. : ARL.
  13. Baum, Rudy M. 2004. “ Socialized Science”. Chemical & Engineering News, 82(38) : 7. https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-v082n038.p007
  14. Bjork, Bo-Christer. 2004. “Open Access to Scientific Publications : An Analysis of the Barriers to Change?”. Information Research, 9(2).[ cited 2005. 2. 23]. .
  15. Bocquet, Antoine. 2004.“Alternatives for STM Publishing in the Internet Age : A Personal View” . "CONCERT 2004年會", 2004年11 月10-11日. 國立台灣大學 應用力學硏究所 國際曾議廳. [online]. [cited 2005. 2. 22]. .
  16. Bocquet, Antoine. 2004.“Alternatives for STM Publishing in the Internet Age : A Personal View”.2004 .全國 學術電子資訊資源共享聯盟. [ online]. [cited 2005. 2. 10.]. .
  17. Cornell University Library. 2004. “Issues in Scholarly Communication”. [online]. [cited 2005. 2. 19.]. .
  18. Doyle, Helen and Andy Gass. 2004.“ Open Access to Scholarly Publications : A Model for Enhanced Knowledge Management?”. In Reflections on the Debate, 20 Sep. - 4 Oct.
  19. Ewing, John. “A Modest Proposal : Copyright and Scholarly Journals.” [online]. [cited 2005. 2. 10.]. .
  20. Goodman, David. 2004. “The Criteria for Open Acces”. Serials Review, 30(4) : 258-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.009
  21. Harnad, Stevan and Tim Brody. 2004. “Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals”. D-Lib Magazine, 10. [online].[cited 2005. 2. 10.]. .
  22. Harnad, Stevan, et al. 2004. “The Access/Impact Problem and the Green and Gold Roads to Open Access”. Serials Review, 30(4) : 310-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.013
  23. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. 2004. Scientific Publications : Free for All?. London : The Stationery Office Limited.
  24. Kean, Gene. 2004.“ 17th Annual Study of Society Journal Prices for Scientific and Medical Society Journals”. The Newsletter for Journal Publishers, 1 : 3.
  25. LISU. 2004. LISU Annual Library Statistics 2004 : Featuring Trend Analysis of UK Public & Academic Libraries 1993-2003. Leicestershire : LISU.
  26. McCabe, M.J. 1999. “The Impact of Publisher Mergers on Journal Prices : An Update”. ARL Bimonthly Report, 207. [online]. [cited 2005. 2. 24]..
  27. McCabe, M.J. 2001. “Impact of Publisher Mergers on Journal Prices : Theory and Evidence”. Serials Librarian, 40(1/2): 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v40n01_13
  28. McCabe, M.J. 2002. “Journal Pricing and Mergers : A Portfolio Approach”. American Economic Review, 92(1): 259-269. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802760015702
  29. McVeigh, Marie E. 2004. “Open Access Journals in the ISI Citation Databases : Analysis of Impact Factors and Citation Patterns : A citation study from Thomson Scientific”.[ online].[ cited 2005. 2. 10]. .
  30. Miller, Cass T. and Julianna C. Harris. 2004. “Scholarly Journal Publications : Conflicting Agendas for Scholars, Publishers, and Institutions”. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 35(2): 73-91. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.35.2.73
  31. Olivieri, Rene. 2004. “The Secret Life of STM Publishing.”In Presentation to UKSG Conference, 29 Mar. [online]. [cited 2005. 2. 28].
  32. Open Society Institute. 2004. Guide to Business Planning for Converting a Subscription-based Journal to Open Access. New York : OSI.
  33. Regazzi. John. 2004.“The Shifting Sands of Open Access Publishing, a Publisher’s View”. Serials Review, 30(4): 275-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.010
  34. Rowlands, Ian. 2004. “Do Authors Demand Open Access?”. In STM Publishing : at the Crossroad? : Challenges and Response : 2004 STM Annual Conference, 5th October, Frankfurt.
  35. Susman, Thomas M., David J. Carter, Ropes and Gray LLP. 2003. Publisher Mergers : A Consumer- Based Approach to Antitrust Analysis. Washington, D.C. : Information Access Alliance.
  36. Tananbaum, Greg. 2003. “Of Wolves and Boys : the Scholarly Communication Crisis”. Learned Publishing, 16(4): 285-289. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315103322422035
  37. Tenopir, Carol and Donald W. King. 2001. “ Lessons for the Future of Journals.” Nature, 413(6875) : 672-673. https://doi.org/10.1038/35099602
  38. The Wellcome Trust. 2003. Economic Analysis of Scientific Research Publishing. Huston : The Wellcome Trust.
  39. Ware, Mark. 2004. “Institutional Repositories : The State of Player”. In PALS Conference 2004 : Institutional Repositories and Their Impact on Publishing, 24 June, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
  40. Worlock, David R. 2004. Changing Business Models in Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishing Marketplace. Paris : OECD.