The Ecological Management and Characteristics of Bird Communities at the World Cup Park in Seoul

서울시 월드컵공원 야생조류 군집 특성 및 생태적 관리방안

  • 한봉호 (서울시립대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 김정호 (서울시립대학교 도시과학연구원) ;
  • 손병도 (서울시 한강관리사업소) ;
  • 이경재 (서울시립대학교 조경학과)
  • Published : 2005.12.31

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine the inhabitation of wild birds at the World Cup Park and to offer the Park ecological management data. Land use md actual vegetation were examined to analyze the inhabitation of wild birds. Characteristics of bird communities were analyzed by dominance, density, diversity index and guild concept. You compare inhabitation before and after the Park was built. We classified the land use and actual vegetation into twenty-six types. Robinia pseudoacacia dominated the study area. Pyeonghwa Park and Nanji-cheon Park were simple-layer structures composed of alien woody species. The observed birds after the World Cup Park included 33 families 77 species, and 9,751 individuals. Among Wild Life types, the shrub and bush type was dominant. There were 26 species of resident birds, 20 species of summer visitors, 18 species of winter visitors, and 12 species of passage migrants. The following numbers of species and individuals were observed: in Hanul park, 38 species, 3,151 individuals; in Noul park, 45 species, 2,061 individuals; in Nanji-cheon park, 42 species, 2,742 individuals; in Pyeonghwa park, 29 species, 875 individuals; and in Maebongsan(Mt.) area, 35 species, 922 individuals. Species diversities for each area were as follows: Noul park, 2.613; Hanul park, 2,301; Nanji-cheon, 2.228; and Pyeonghwa park, 2,019; and each season: summer, 2.652; spring, 2.650: winter, 2.561; and autumn 2.176. The diversity of species increased from 1.135 in 1994 to 2.324 in 2001. We recommended that the park be differented into different ecological areas in order to encourage the appearance of wild birds at the World Cup Park. The management area was divided into three districts(conservation area, preservation and restoration area, use area). The conservation area was established to the west of a waste landfill and in the downstream area of NanJi-cheon, the preservation and restoration area was established in the midstream area of Nanji-cheon, and the use area was established in the buffer zone of Pyeonghwa Park and the Nanji pond greenspace.

Keywords

References

  1. 김태욱, 김갑덕, 우한정(1980) 야생조수의 분포와 서식밀도 및 식성에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 농과대학 연습림 보고 16: 101-115
  2. 박찬열(1994) 야생조류의 서식에 적합한 도시환경림 조성 및 관리방안. 서울대학교 대학원 석사학위논문
  3. 서울시정개발연구원(2000) 난지도 지역 환경성 검토 및 친환경적 정비방안
  4. 서울특별시(1994) 난지도 매립지 안정화 공사 기본설계 보고서. 서울특별시
  5. 서울특별시(2000) 밀레니엄공원 기본계획. 서울특별시
  6. 서울특별시(2002) 서울의 환경 -2002 환경백서-. 서울특별시
  7. 서울특별시 공원녹지관리사업소(2002) 길동생태공원 모니터링 결과보고서. 서울특별시
  8. 서울특별시 공원녹지관리사업소(2003) 월드컵공원 자연생태계 모니터링 및 관리방안-1차년도-. 서울특별시
  9. 서창완(2000) GIS와 로지스틱 회귀분석을 이용한 멧돼지 서식지 모형개발. 서울대학교 환경대학원 박사학위논문
  10. 우한정, 김윤수, 김상옥, 구태희(1987) 남산의 조류. 자연보존 59: 27-32
  11. 이수동(2005) 야생조류 이동을 위한 산지형 도시녹지의 연결성 평가 및 연결기법 연구 -서울시를 대상으로-. 서울시립대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  12. 이우신, 구태희, 박진영(2000) 한국의 새(야외원색도감). 서울: LG상록재단
  13. 채진확, 구태희(2004) 서울시의 조류다양성 증진을 위한 도시 비오톱 특성 분석. 국토연구 40: 87-100
  14. 환경부(1995) 전국 그린네트워크 구상 -사람과 생물이 어우러지는 자연만들기-
  15. 葉山嘉一(1994) 都市綠地における鳥類の生態特性に關する研究. 造園雜誌 57(5): 229-234
  16. 李字新(1990)森木環境構造と鳥類の採餌二ツチに關する研究. 北海道大學 大學院 博士學位論文
  17. Gavareski, C. A.(1976) Relation of park size and vegetation to urban bird populations in Seattle. Washington. The Condor 78: 375-382 https://doi.org/10.2307/1367699
  18. Hopper. R. G., H. S. Grawford, and R. F. Harlow(1973) Bird density and diversity as related to vegetation in forest recreational area. J. of Forestry 71: 766-769
  19. Hounsome, M.(1979) Bird Life in the City -Nature in Cities-. New York: Pitman Press
  20. Loesch, C. R. and R. M. Kaminski(1989) Winter bodyweight patterns of female mallards fed agricultural seeds. J. Wildlife Management 53: 1081-1087 https://doi.org/10.2307/3809614
  21. Miller. R. W.(1997) Urban Forestry: Planning and Managing Urban Green Spaces (2nd ed.). London: Prentice-Hall Inc
  22. Morrison. M L. and S. H. Flinnea(1999) Standard terminology: toward a common language use by birds. J. Field Omithol 55: 330-335
  23. North, P. M and J. H. Reynold(1996) Microhabitat analysis using radiotelemetry locations and polytomous logistic regression. J. Wildlife Management 60(3): 639-653 https://doi.org/10.2307/3802083
  24. Payne, N. F., C. Fred, and Bryant(1994) Techniques for Wildlife Habitat Management of Uplands. New York: Mcgraw-Hill, Inc
  25. Pielou. E. C.(1975) Mathematical Ecology. New York: John Wiley & Sons
  26. Root, R. B.(1967) The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-gray gnatcatcher, Ecol. Monogr. 37: 317-350 https://doi.org/10.2307/1942327
  27. Roth, R. R.(1976) Spatial heterogeneity and bird species diversity. Ecology 57: 773-782 https://doi.org/10.2307/1936190
  28. Shaw, J. H.(1985) Introduction to Wildlife Management. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Co
  29. Tilghman. N. G.(1987) Characteristics of urban woodlands affecting breeding bird diversity and abundance. Landscape and Urban Planning 14: 415-495 https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(87)90053-3
  30. Treweek, J. P. and P. Benstead(1997) The Wet Grassland Guide -Managing Floodplain and Coastal Wet Grassland for Wildlife-. Bedforshine: Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
  31. Whitcomb. R. F., C. S. Robbins, J. E. Linch, B. L. Whicomb, K. Klimkiewicz, and D. Bystrak(1981) Effects of forest fragmentation on avifauna of the eastern deciduous forest. In R. L. Burgess and D. M. Sharpe, eds., Forest Island Dynamics in Man-dominated Landscape. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 125-205