Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제18권6호
  • /
  • Pages.755-761
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Genetic Variability and Relationships of Native Japanese Chickens Assessed by Microsatellite DNA Profiling - Focusing on the Breeds Established in Kochi Prefecture, Japan -

  • Osman, S.A.-M. (Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University) ;
  • Sekino, M. (Tohoku National Fisheries Research Institute) ;
  • Nishibori, M. (Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University) ;
  • Yamamoto, Y. (Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University) ;
  • Tsudzuki, M. (Laboratory of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University)
  • 투고 : 2004.07.12
  • 심사 : 2004.12.27
  • 발행 : 2005.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Blood samples were collected from eight native Japanese breeds of chickens (Miyadi-dori, Ohiki, Onaga-dori, Shoukoku, Tosa-Jidori, Tosa-Kukin, Toutenkou and Uzurao) and two foreign breeds of chickens (White Leghorn and Rhode Island Red) to examine the genetic variability and relationships among the breeds by using a microsatellite DNA technique. Except for the Shoukoku breed, the other Japanese chicken breeds all originate from Kochi Prefecture. Ohiki, Onaga-dori, Tosa-Jidori, Toutenkou and Uzurao are fancy fowl, and Miyadi-dori and Tosa-Kukin are utility fowl. Among the fancy fowl, Ohiki, Onaga-dori, and Toutenkou males have thick and long feathers in the saddle and tail. Genetic variabilities of the 20 microsatellites examined, varied depending on the breed: the mean number of alleles per locus ranged from 2.05 (Miyadi-dori) to 3.90 (Rhode Island Red); proportion of polymorphic loci ranged from 0.75 (Miyadi-dori) to 1.00 (Rhode Island Red, Shoukoku and Uzurao); and mean expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.330 (Miyadi-dori) to 0.607 (Rhode Island Red). Unique microsatellite alleles were detected in each breed. Using the neighbour-joining method, phylogenetic trees were constructed based on the genetic distances of D$_{A}$ and D$_{ST}$. Among the breeds originating from Kochi Prefecture, fancy and utility breeds belonged to different clusters. Among the fancy breeds, those having thick and long feathers in the tail and saddle showed a close genetic relationship to the Shoukoku breed, which also has thick and long feathers in the tail and saddle.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Buchanan, F. C., L. J. Adams, R. P. Littlejohn, J. F. Maddox and A. M. Crawford. 1994. Determination of evolutionary relationships among sheep breeds using microsatellites. Genomics 22:397-403.
  2. Cheng, H. H. and L. B. Crittenden. 1994. Microsatellite markers for genetic mapping in the chicken. Poult. Sci. 73:539-546.
  3. Cheng, H. H., I. Levin, R. L. Vallejo, H. Khatib, J. B. Dodgson, L. B. Crittenden and J. Hillel. 1995. Development of a genetic map of the chicken with markers of high utility. Poult. Sci. 74:1855-1874.
  4. Crooijmans, R. P. M. A., A. B. F. Groen. A. J. A. van Kampen, Van der S. Beek, J. J. van Der Poel and M. A. M. Groenen. 1996a. Microsatellite polymorphism in commercial broiler and layer lines estimated using pooled blood samples. Poult. Sci. 75:904-909.
  5. Crooijmans, R. P. M. A., A. J. A. van Kampen, J. J. van der Poel and M. A. M Groenen. 1993. Highly polymorphic microsatellite markers in poultry. Anim. Genet. 24: 441-443.
  6. Crooijmans, R. P. M. A., P. A. M. van Oers, J. A. Strijk, J. J. van der Poel and M. A. M Groenen. 1996b. Preliminary linkage map of the chicken (Gallus domesticus) genome based on microsatellite markers: 77 New Markers Mapped. Poult. Sci. 75:746-752.
  7. Emara, M. G., H. Kim, J. J. Zhu, R. R. Lapierre, N. Lakshmanan and H. S. Lillehoj. 2002. Genetic diversity at the major histocompatibility complex (B) and microsatellite loci in three commercial broiler pure lines. Poult. Sci. 81:1609-1617.
  8. Goldstein, D. B. and D. D. Pollock. 1997. Launching microsatellites: A review of mutation processes and methods of phylogenetic inference. J. Hered. 88:335-342.
  9. Groen, A. F., R. P. M. A. Crooijmans, A. J. A. van Kampen, S. van der Beek, J. J. van der Poel and M. A. M. Groenen. 1994. Microsatellite polymorphism in commercial broilers and layers. In Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Guelph, Ontario, pp. 94-97.
  10. Groenen, M. A. M., H. H. Cheng, N. Bumstead, B. F. Benkel, W. E. Briles, T. Burke, D. W. Burt, L. B. Crittenden, J. Dodgson, J. Hillel, S. Lamont, A. P. de leon, M. Soller, H. Takahashi and A. Vignal. 2000. A consensus linkage map of the chicken genome. Genome Res. 10:137-47.
  11. Hashiguchi, T., M. Tsuneyoshi, T. Nishida, H. Higashiuwatoko and E. Hiraoka. 1981. Phylogenetic relationships determined by the blood protein types of fowls (in Japanese with English summary). Jpn. J. Zootech. Sci. 52:713-729.
  12. Hawksworth, D. 1982. British Poultry Standards. 4th edn. Butterworth Scientific, London.
  13. Japan Chicken Association. 2003. The Guidebook of Special Meat-Type Chickens (in Japanese). Zenkoku-Shokuchou-Shinbun Co. Ltd., Tokyo.
  14. Kamimoto, H. 1951. The tale of Miyadi-dori (in Japanese). Niwatori-no-Kenkyu 26:38-40.
  15. Kuroda, N., T. Yamaguchi, Y. Tanabe and K. Ichinoe. 1987. Japanese Chickens as Natural Monuments (in Japanese). Kyoikusya, Tokyo.
  16. Lewontin, R. C. and J. L. Hubby. 1966. A molecular approach to the study of genetic heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseduobscura. Genetics 54:595-609.
  17. MacHugh, D. E., R. T. Loftus, D. G. Barley, P. M. Sharp and P. Cunningham. 1994. Microsatellite DNA variation within and among European cattle breeds. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Series B. 256:25-31.
  18. Martinez, A. M., J. V. Delgado, A. Rodero and J. L. Vega-pla. 2000. Genetic structure of the Iberian pig breed using microsatellite. Anim. Genet. 31:295-301.
  19. Mitsui, T. 1979. General View of Japanese Native Chickens (in Japanese). Petlife-Sha, Tokyo.
  20. Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Natul. 106:283-291.
  21. Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. 89:583-590.
  22. Nei, M., F. Tajima and Y. Tateno. 1983. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data: 2. Gene frequency data. J. Mol. Evol. 19:153-170.
  23. Nishida, T., Y. Hayashi, T. Fujioka, I. Tsugiyama and K. Mochizuki. 1985a. Osteometric studies on the phylogenetic relationships of Japanese native fowls. Jpn. J. Vet. Sci. 47:25-37.
  24. Nishida, T., Y. Hayashi and T. Hashiguchi. 1985b. Somatometrical studies on the morphological relationships of Japanese native fowls. Jpn. J. Zootech. Sci. 56:645-657.
  25. Oana, H. 1951. The Histories of Japanese Native Chickens (in Japanese). Nihonkei-Kenkyusha, Tokyo.
  26. Okabayashi, H., S. Kamiya and Y. Tanabe. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships among Japanese native chicken breeds based on blood protein polymorphism (in Japanese with English summary). Jpn. Poult. Sci. 35:173-181.
  27. Okada, I., K. Toyokawa and I. Takayasu. 1980. Genetic relationships of some native chicken breeds in the northern Tohoku district of Japan (in Japanese with English summary). Jpn. Poult. Sci. 17:337-343.
  28. Okada, I., Y. Yamamoto, T. Hashiguchi and S. Ito. 1984. Phylogenetic studies on the Japanese native breeds of chickens. Jpn. Poult. Sci. 21:318-329.
  29. Okada, I., Y. Yamamoto, A. Shinjo, S. Kimura and H. Hiraoka. 1989. Studies of genetic differentiation within breeds of Japanese indigenous chickens. Jpn. Poult. Sci. 26:207-215.
  30. Osman, A.-M. S., M. Sekino, M. Nishibori, Y. Kawamoto, K. Kinoshita, Y. Yamamoto and M. Tsudzuki. 2004. Genetic variability and relationships of Japanese native chickens assessed by means of microsatellite profiling approach - Focusing on the Oh-Shamo (Japanese Large Game) and its related breeds. J. Poult. Sci. 41:94-109.
  31. Pandey, A. K., M. S. Tantia, D. Kumar, B. Misra, P. Choudhary and R. K. Vijh. 2002. Microsatellite analysis of three poultry breeds of India. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:1536-1542.
  32. Petit, E., S. Aulagnier, D. Vaiman, C. Bouissou and B. Crouauroy. 1997. Microsatellite variation in a introduced mouflon population. J. Hered. 88:517-520.
  33. Ponsuksili, S., K. Wimmers and P. Horst. 1996. Genetic variability in chickens using polymorphic microsatellite markers. Thai J. Agr. Sci. 29:571-580.
  34. Saitou, N. and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425.
  35. Sawada, Y. 1978. My grandfather, I, and Miyadi-dori (in Japanese). Nippon-no-Aigankei 55:8-9.
  36. Takahashi, H., Y. Nirasawa, M. Nagamine, M. Tsudzuki and Y. Yamamoto. 1998. Genetic relationships among Japanese native breeds of chicken based on microsatellite DNA polymorphisms. J. Hered. 89:543-546.
  37. Tanabe, Y. and M. Mizutani. 1980. Studies on the phylogenetic relationships of the Japanese native fowl breeds: 3. Genetic distances among the 16 breeds based on 16 loci, and their dendrogram (in Japanese with English sumarry). Jpn. Poult. Sci. 17:116-121.
  38. Tanabe, Y., T. Iida, H. Yoshino, A. Shinjo and S. Muramatsu. 1991. Studies on the phylogenetic relationships of the Japanese native fowl breeds: 5. The comparisons among native fowl breeds in Japan and its adjacent areas and European and American fowl breeds (in Japanese with English summary). Jpn. Poult. Sci. 28:266-277.
  39. Tsudzuki, M. 2003. Japanese native chickens. In The Relationship between Indigenous Animals and Humans in APEC Region. (Ed. H. L. Chang and Y. C. Huang). The Chinese Society of Animal Science, Taiwan.
  40. Vanhala, T., M. Tuiskula-Haavisto, K. Elo, J. Vilkki and A. A. Maki-Tanil. 1998. Evaluation of genetic variability and genetic distances between eight chicken lines using microsatellite markers. Poult. Sci. 77:783-790.
  41. van Marle-Koster, E. and L. H. Nel. 2000. Genetic characterization of native southern African chicken populations: Evaluation and selection of polymorphic microsatellite markers. South Afrc. J. Anim. Sci. 30:1-6.
  42. van Wulfften Palthe, A. W. 1992. C. S. Th. van Gink’s Poultry Paintings. Duch Branch of the World’s Poultry Science Association, Beekbergen, the Netherlands.

피인용 문헌

  1. Study on polymorphisms of microsatellite DNA of six Chinese indigenous sheep and goat breeds vol.1, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-007-0078-8
  2. Identification of quantitative trait loci affecting shank length, body weight and carcass weight from the Japanese cockfighting chicken breed, Oh-Shamo (Japanese Large Game) vol.117, pp.1-4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.1159/000103190
  3. Endothelin Receptor B2 (EDNRB2) Is Responsible for the Tyrosinase-Independent Recessive White (mow) and Mottled (mo) Plumage Phenotypes in the Chicken vol.9, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086361
  4. Paternity Identification Using the Multiplex PCR with Microsatellite Markers in Chicken vol.48, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14397/jals.2014.48.2.69
  5. Genetic Variability and Relationships of Native Japanese Chickens Based on Microsatellite DNA Polymorphisms-Focusing on the Natural Monuments of Japan vol.43, pp.1, 2005, https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.43.12
  6. Genetic Diversity of 14 Indigenous Grey Goose Breeds in China Based on Microsatellite Markers vol.19, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1
  7. The Genetic Variability and Relationships of Japanese and Foreign Chickens Assessed by Microsatellite DNA Profiling vol.19, pp.10, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1369
  8. Genetic Variation and Relationships of Korean Native Chickens and Foreign Breeds Using 15 Microsatellite Markers vol.19, pp.11, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1546
  9. Analysis of Genetic Diversity of the Thai Swamp Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Using Cattle Microsatellite DNA Markers vol.19, pp.5, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.617
  10. Microsatellite Marker를 이용한 한국재래돼지 집단의 품종특성 및 원산지 추적을 위한 개체식별체계 설정 vol.27, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2007.27.2.150
  11. Use of Cattle Microsatellite Markers to Assess Genetic Diversity of Thai Swamp Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) vol.21, pp.2, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70327
  12. Study on Genetic Diversity of Six Duck Populations with Microsatellite DNA vol.21, pp.6, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70367
  13. Microsatellite Marker를 사용한 재래 닭 품종 유전적 특성 및 개체 식별력 분석 vol.37, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5536/kjps.2010.37.1.081