References
- Kirsch A, Neuendorff G, Ackermann KL, Nagel R, Durr W. Camlog connection: Requirements for a reliable implant prosthetic treament concept; tooth for tooth restoration. Quintessenz 1999; 50:1-18
- Dan ET, William RL. Tissue-integrated prostheses complication. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7:477-484
- Jemt T et al. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement. A l-year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6:29-36
- Levine RA, et al. A multicenter retrospective analysis of ITI implant system used for single-tooth replacements: Preliminary results at six or more months of loading. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 1997; 12: 237-242
- Merz BR. Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection. An 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 519-526
- Chung KM, Chung CH, Jeong SM. Finite element analysis of implant prostheis according to platform width of fixture. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2003; 41:674-688
- Matsushita Y, Kithoh M, Mizuta K, Ikeda H, Suetsugu T. Two-dimentional FEM analysis of hydroxyapatite implants: diameter effects on stress distribution. J Oral Implantol 1990; 16:6-11
- Morimoto K, Kihara A, Takeshita F, Suetsugu T. An experimental study on the tissue compatibility of the titanium blade-vent implant coated with HAP-alumina in the semi- functional state. J Oral Implantol 1987; 13:387-401
- Kim NH, Chung CH, Son MK, Back DH. A study on the fit of the implant-abutment-screw interface. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2003; 41:503-518
- Haraldson T, Zarb GA. A 10-year follow-up study of the masticatory system after treatment with osseointegrated implant bridges. Scand J Dent Rec 1988; 96:243-252
- Lum LB, Osier J.F. Load transfer from endosteal implants to supporting bone: An analysis using statics. Part one: Horizontal loading. J Oral Implantol 1992; 18:343-348
- Holmes DC, Grigsby WR, Goel VK, Keller JC. Comparison of stress transmission in the IMZ implant system with polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile element: A finite element stress analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7:450-458
- Patterson EA, Burguete RL, Thoi MH, Johns RB. Distribution of load in an oral orosthesis system: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10:552-560
- Rangert B, Jemt T, Jomeus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989; 4:241-247
- Rangert B, Krogh PHJ, Langer B, van Roekel NB. Bending overload and implant fracture: A retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10:326-334
- Rangert B, Enouard F, Amoux JP, Sarment DP. Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12:360-370
- Lum LB. A biomechanical rationale for the use of short implants. J. Oral Implantol 1991; 17:126-131
- Weinberg LA. Force distribution in splinted anterior teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1957; 10:484-494 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(57)90007-5
- Weinberg LA. Force distribution in splinted posterior teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1957; 10:1268-1276 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4220(57)80025-5
- Weinberg LA. The biomechanics of force distribution in implant- supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8:19-31
- Clelland NL, Lee JK, Bimbenet OC, Gilat A. Use of an axisymmetric finite element method to compare maxillary bone variables for a loaded implant. J Prosthodont 1993; 2:183-189 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1993.tb00405.x
- Jemt T, Lekholm U, Grondahl K. A 3-year follow-up study of early single implant restorations ad modem Branemark, Int J Oral Perodont Rest Dent 1990; 10: 340-349
- Jemt T, Linden B, Lekholm U. Failures and complications in 127 consecutive placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7:40-44
- Mollersten L, Lockowandt P, Linden LA. Comparison of strength and failure mode of seven implant systems: An in vitro test. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:582-591 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70009-X
- Boggan RS, Strong JT, Misch CE, Bidez MW. Influence of hex geometry and prosthetic table width on static and fatigue strength of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82:436-440 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70030-2
- Akca K, Cehreli MC, lplikcioglu H. Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant abutment complex of a reduced diameter morse taper implant: a nonlinear finite element stress analysis, Clinical Oral Implants Research 2003;14:444-455 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00828.x
- Akca K, Iplikcioglu H. Evaluation of the effect of the residual bone angulation on implant-supported fixed prosthesis in mandibular posterior edentulism. Part II : 3-D finite element stress analysis. Implant Dent 2001; 10:239-245
- Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8:290-298 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080407.x
- Norton MR. Assessment of cold welding properties of internal conical interface two commercially available implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81:159-166 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70243-X
- Norton MR. In vitro evaluation of the strength of the conical implant-to-abutment joint in two commercially available implant systems.. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83:567-571 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70016-3
- Sutter F, et al. The new concept of ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants : Part 1. Engineering and design. Int J Oral Maxilofac Implant. 1988; 3:161-172
- Sutter F, Webber HP, Sorensen J, Belser U. The new restorative concept of the ITI dental implant system: design and engineering. Int J Perodont Rest Dent 1993; 13:409-431
- Balfour A, O'Brien GR. Comparative study of antirotational single tooth abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73:36-43 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80270-7
- Krennmair G. Schmidinger S, Waldenberger O. Single-tooth replacement with frialit-2 system: A retrospective clinical analysis of 146 implants. Int J Oral Maxilofac Implanst. 2002; 17:78-85