Ethanolamine and boron abuse to limit microbial growth in water-synthetic metalworking fluids

미생물 성장을 억제하기 위하여 수용성 절삭유에 과다하게 첨가한 붕소와 아민 사례 연구

  • Park, Donguk (Department of Environmental Health, Korea National Open University) ;
  • Paik, Dohyeon (Department of Environmental Health, Seonam University)
  • Received : 2005.12.05
  • Accepted : 2005.12.27
  • Published : 2005.12.30

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine whether a specific synthetic metalworking fluid (MWF), "A", in use for 10 months without replacement, displayed microbial resistance and to identify the additives associated with the control of microbial growth. Three synthetic MWF products ("A", "B", and "C") were studied every week for two months. Microbial deterioration of the fluids was assessed through evaluation by endotoxin, bacteria and fungi levels in the MWFs. In addition, formaldehyde, boron, ethanolamine, and copper levels were also studied to determine whether they influence microbial growth in water-based MWFs. Throughout the entire study in the sump where MWF "A" was used, bacteria counts were lower than 103 CFU/mL, and endotoxins never exceeded 103 EU/mL. These levels were significantly lower than levels observed in sumps badly deteriorated with microbes. Boron levels in MWF "A" ranged from 91.7 to 129.6 ppm, which was significantly higher than boron levels found in other MWF products. The total level of ethanolamine (EA) in MWF "A" ranged from 35,595 to 57,857 ppm (average 40,903 ppm), which was over ten times higher than that found in other MWFs. Monoethanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA) and triethanolamine (TEA) concentrations in MWF "A" were also significantly higher than seen in other MWFs. However, although EA and boron might improve anti-microbial performance, their abuse can pose a serious risk to workers who handle MWFs. From an industrial hygiene perspective, our study results stress that the positive synergistic effect of boron and EA in reducing microbial activity in MWF must be balanced with the potentially negative health effects of such additives. Our study also addresses the disadvantage of failing to comprehensively report MWF additives on Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS). Future research in MWF formulation is needed to find the best level of EA and boron for achieving optimal synergistic anti-microbial effects while minimizing employee health hazards.

Keywords

References

  1. American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), Water Environmental Federation (WEF): Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater (Pub. No. 2320A), 19th ed., pp. 2-25. Washington, D.C.: APHA, 1995
  2. Bennett EO. : Corrosion inhibitors as preservatives for metalworking fluidsethanolamines. Lub Engi 1979; 35:137-144
  3. Bennett EO. : The biology of metalworking fluids. Lub Engi 1972; 28:237-247
  4. Beyer KH, Smith J, Jones R. : Final report on the safety assessment of triethanolamine, diethanolarnine, and monoethanolamine. J Ame Coll of Toxi 1983; 2(7): 183-235 https://doi.org/10.3109/10915818309142006
  5. Challis BC, A Edwards RR, Hunma SA et al. : Rapid formation of Nnitrosamines from nitrogen oxides under neutral and alkaline conditions, Scientific Publication No. 19. 1978. 127-142. Lyon, France: World Health Organization/International Agency for Research on Cancer
  6. Hernandez, PM., I.C. Larsen, and C.R. Petersen : The various factors involved in developing a microbial-resistant aqueous cutting fluid. Lubrication Engineering 1984;41 : 425-429
  7. Krystofiak, S.P., and M. Schaper: Prediction of an occupational exposure limit for a mixture on the basis of its components: application to metalworking fluids Journal Name 1996,57:239-244
  8. Law, A.B., and E.S. Lashen: Microbial efficacy of a methylchloro-/ methylisothiazolone/ copper preservative in metalworking fluids. Lubrication Engineering 1991;47:25- 30
  9. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH): Criteria for a Recommended Standard Occupahonal Exposure to Metalworking Fluids. Cincinnati, Ohio: NIOSH; 1998
  10. National Toxicology Program (NTP): NTP draft technical report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of driethanolamine (CAS No. 111-42- 2) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (dermal studies) (TR 478). Research Triangle Park, NC: NTP; 1999
  11. National Program (NTP): NTP draft technical report on the toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of triethanolamine (CAS No. 102-71-6) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (dermal studies) (TR 449). Research Triangle Park, NC: NTP; 1999
  12. Oppong, D., and E.O. Bennett: Use of a mixture of alcoholamines to potentiate the antimicrobial activities of certain cutting fluid preservatives. Tribology International 1989;22:343-345 https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-679X(89)90150-3
  13. Rossmre, H.W.: Anti-microbial agents for water-based metalworking fluids. Journal of Occupational Medicine 1981 ;23:247-254
  14. Rossmoore, W.R.: Biostatic fluids, friendly bacteria, and other myths in metalworking microbiology. Lubrication Engineering 1993;253- 260
  15. Rossmoore, H.W., and L.A. Rossmoore: Factors affecting selection of metalworking fluid biocides. Lubrication Engineering 1996;23:23- 28
  16. Rossmoore, H.W., and L.A. Rossmoore: The identification of a defined microbial inoculum for the evaluation of biocides in water-based metalworking fluids. Lubrication Engineering 1980;36: 16-20
  17. Sandin, M., S. Allenmark and L. Edebo: Selective toxicity of alkanolamines. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1990;34(3):491-493 https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.34.3.491
  18. Savonius, B., H. Keskinen, M. Tuppurainen, and L. Kanerva: Occupational asthma caused by ethanolamines. Allergy 1994;49 (10):877-881 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.1994.tb00791.x
  19. Steiner, B., J. Omelkova, B. Proks, V. Sasinkova, and M. Koos: Aliphatic 1,2-Alkanolamines-inhibitors of $\beta$ glucanase from Candida utilis Folis. Microbiology 1993;38(5):392-394