Eyebrow Lift and Malar Fat Lift by Absorbable Suture Fixation with Subperiosteal Dissection

골막하 박리와 흡수성 봉합사에 의한 눈썹과 광대지방층의 거상술

  • Chung, Jaehoon (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Yoonhoo (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jang, Chunghyun (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 정재훈 (서울대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 이윤호 (서울대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 장충현 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 성형외과)
  • Received : 2004.09.20
  • Published : 2005.03.10

Abstract

In some blepharochalasis patients, upper blepharoplasty alone is not satisfactory because of narrow distance between eyebrow and eyelash. On that occasion, eyebrow lift is advisable. There are many methods of classical eyebrow lift, such as direct excision, transblepharoplasty approach, anterior hairline technique, and so on. But they are not so effective, have a tendency to recur and also give rise to side effects; unacceptable scar, facial nerve palsy, sensory loss and hematoma, etc. Some patients who have prominent nasolabial folds, are reluctant to perform face lift procedure due to psychologic or economic burden. The authors performed the eyebrow lift procedure separately or simultaneously with face lift or forehead lift. After making 2 or 3 slit incisions, we passed absorbable suture material, 3-0 vicryl, through suborbicularis oculi fat layer. Then it was passed through subperiosteal plane and fixated to the temporalis fascia. When patients complain prominent nasolabial folds, malar fat pad was elevated also in the same manner. This methods is effective and has minimal complication such as facial nerve palsy, scar, sensory loss. Recurrent tendency was rarely observed during follow-up. Dimples were observed at slit incision sites but they disappeared within 2 or 3 weeks. Eyebrow lift and malar fat lift by absorbable suture elevation with subperiosteal dissection is a simple and less morbid. Because of its effectiveness and little side effect or complication, this procedure can be a useful method.

Keywords

References

  1. Vinas JC, Caviglia C, Cortinas JL: Forehead rhytidoplasty and brow lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg 57: 445, 1976 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197604000-00006
  2. Paul MD: Subperiosteal transblepharoplasty forehead lift. Aesthetic Plast Surg 20: 129, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02275531
  3. Rho K, Kang YS, Ryu BS, Lee MJ, Yang JY: Correction of the aging upper third of the face using by transpalpebral approach. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 27: 11, 2000
  4. Flowers RS: Periorbital aesthetic surgery for men: Eyelids and related structures. Clin Plast Surg 18: 689, 1991
  5. Chajchir A: Endoscopic subperiosteal forehead lift. Aesthetic Plast Surg 18: 269, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00449793
  6. Ramirez OM: The anchor subperiosteal forehead lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 95: 993, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199505000-00006
  7. Oslin B, Core GB, Vasconez La: The biplanar endoscopically assisted forehead lift. Clin Plast Surg 22: 633, 1995
  8. Kim IG, Oh JK, Baek DB: Personal experience and algorithm of endoscopically assisted subperiosteal face lift in orientals for 5 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 108: 1768, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200111000-00053