Dermis Graft for Wound Coverage: A Preliminary Report

창상피복을 위한 진피이식술의 예비보고

  • Yoon, Tae-Hwan (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Han, Seung-Kyu (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Bae (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ki, Woo-Kyung (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine)
  • 윤태환 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 한승규 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김정배 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김우경 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2004.09.06
  • Published : 2005.03.10

Abstract

The two major concerns in skin grafting are poor color match at the recipient site and donor site morbidity. To overcome the limitations of the classic skin graft, we have used dermis graft-deepithelialized split thickness skin graft-for coverage of small to medium sized wounds. The important aspects of this methods involve the immediate return of epidermis to the donor site to overcome donor site morbidity and restoration of the epidermis at the recipient site by neo epithelization from the adjacent skin. From April of 2001 to July of 2003, the dermis graft was applied to 32 patients. Simultaneously, the regular split thickness skin graft procedure was performed in 33 patients. We compared the healing time in all patients. The scar condition was also evaluated at 2 to 12 months after operation. The entire dermis grafts were reepithelialized in 15.5 days. The skin grafted wounds were healed by 11.8 days. Regarding the donor sites, donor sites of dermis graft healed within 7.5 days. On the contrary those of regular skin graft required 12.8 days. The donor sites of the dermis graft were also superior to those of skin graft in scar quality and patient satisfaction. The dermis graft technique for wound coverage compares favorably to regular skin graft technique in both recipient and donor sites aesthetically and functionally.

Keywords

References

  1. Tyack ZF, Pegg S, Ziviani J: Postbum dyspigmentation: Its assessment, management, and relationship to scarring. J Burn Care Rehabil 18: 435, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004630-199709000-00012
  2. Swope VB, Supp AP, Boyce ST: Regulation of cutaneous pigmentation by titration of human melanocytes in cultured skin substitutes grafted to athymic mice. Wound Repair Regen 10: 378, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475X.2002.10607.x
  3. Carlson JA, Grabowski R, Mu XC, Del Rosario A: Possible mechanisms of hypopigmentation in lichen sclerosus. Am J Dermatopathal 24: 97, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000372-200204000-00001
  4. Velangi SS, Rees JL: Why are scars pale? An immunohistochemical study indicating preservation of melanocyte number and function in surgical scars. Acta Derm Venereal 81: 326, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1080/000155501317140016
  5. Dressler J, Busuttil A, Koch R, Harrison DJ: Sequence of melanocyte migration into human scar tissue. Int J Legal Med 115: 61, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004140100225
  6. Chou TD, Chen SL, Lee TW, Olen SG: Reconstruction of burn scar of the upper extremities with artificial skin. Plast Reconstr Surg 108: 378, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200108000-00015