Benchmark Results on the Linearized Equations of Motion of an Uncontrolled Bicycle

  • Schwab A. L. (Laboratory for Engineering Mechanics, Delft University of Technology) ;
  • Meijaard J. P. (School of MMME, The University of Nottingham, University) ;
  • Papadopoulos J. M. (The Paper Converting Machine Company)
  • Published : 2005.01.01

Abstract

In this paper we present the linearized equations of motion for a bicycle as a benchmark. The results obtained by pencil-and-paper and two programs are compared. The bicycle model we consider here consists of four rigid bodies, viz. a rear frame, a front frame being the front fork and handlebar assembly, a rear wheel and a front wheel, which are connected by revolute joints. The contact between the knife-edge wheels and the flat level surface is modelled by holonomic constraints in the normal direction and by non-holonomic constraints in the longitudinal and lateral direction. The rider is rigidly attached to the rear frame with hands free from the handlebar. This system has three degrees of freedom, the roll, the steer, and the forward speed. For the benchmark we consider the linearized equations for small perturbations of the upright steady forward motion. The entries of the matrices of these equations form the basis for comparison. Three diffrent kinds of methods to obtain the results are compared : pencil-and-paper, the numeric multibody dynamics program SPACAR, and the symbolic software system Auto Sim. Because the results of the three methods are the same within the machine round-off error, we assume that the results are correct and can be used as a bicycle dynamics benchmark.

Keywords

References

  1. Besseling, J. F., 1964, The Complete Analogy Between the Matrix Equations and the Continuous Fleld Equations of Structural Analysis, in International Symposium on Analogue and Digital Techniques Applied to Aeronautics: Proceedings, Presses Academiques Europeennes, Bruxelles, pp. 223-242
  2. Carvallo, M. E., 1901, Theorie du mouvement du Monocycle et de la Bicyclette, Journal de LEcole Poly technique, Series 2, Part 1, Volume 5, Cerceau et Monocyle, 1900 pp. 119-188, Part 2, Volume 6, Theorie de la Bicyclette, pp. 1-118
  3. Den Hartog, J. P., 1948, Mechanics, McGrawHill, New York and London
  4. Dohring, E., 1955, Stability of Single-Track Vehicles, (Translated by J. Lotsof, March 1957) Technical report, Institut filr Fahrzeugtechnik, Technische Hochschule Braunschweig, Forsehung Ing.-Wes. 21(2), pp. 50-62
  5. Hand, R. S., 1988, Comparisons and Stability Analysis of Linearized Equations of Motion for a Basic Bicycle Model, MSc Thesis, Cornell University
  6. Jonker, J. B., 1988, A Finite Element Dynamic Analysis of Flexible Spatial Mechanisms and Manipulators, PhD Thesis, Delft University Press, Delft
  7. Jonker, J. B. and Meijaard, J. P., 1990, SP ACAR-Computer Program for Dynamic Anaysis of Flexible Spatial Mechanisms and Manipulators, in Multibody Systems Handbook, W. Schiehlen (ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 123-143
  8. Kane, T. R., 1968, Dynamics, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York
  9. Kane, T. R., 1975, Fundamental Kinematic Relationships for Single-Track Vehicles, International Journal for Mechanical Sciences 17, pp. 499-504 https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7403(75)90014-4
  10. Klein, F., and Sommerfeld, A., 1897, Uber die Theorie des Kreisels, (Chapter IX, Section 8, Stabilitat des Fahrrads, 1910, pp. 863-884.), Teubner, Leipzig
  11. Meijaard, J. P., 1991, Direct Determination of Periodic Solutions of the Dynamical Equations of Flexible Mechanisms and Manipulators, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 32, pp. 1691-1710 https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620320811
  12. Neirnark, Ju. I. and Fufaev, N. A., 1972, Dynamics of Nonholonomic Systems, (Translated from the Russian edition, Nauka, Moscow, 1967), A. M.S., Providence RI
  13. Papadopoulos, J. M., 1987, Bicycle Steering Dynamics and Self-Stability: a Summary Report on Work in Progress, Technical report, Cornell Bicycle Research Project, pp. 1-23 (availabe at: http://tam.comell.edulruina/hplab/bicycles.html)
  14. Rankine, W. J. M., 1869, On the Dynamical Principles of the Motion of Velocipedes, The Engineer, 28, pp. 79, 129, 153, 175
  15. Society of Automotive Engineers, 2001, Vehicle Dynamics Terminology-SAE J670e, 2001 SAE Handbook, SAE international, Warrendale, PA
  16. Sayers, M. W., 1991, Symbolic Computer Language for Multibody Systems, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 14, pp. 1153-1163
  17. Sayers, M. W., 1991, Symbolic Vector/Dyadic Multibody Formalism for Tree-Topology Systems, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 14, pp. 1240-1250
  18. Schwab, A. L. and Meijaard, J. P., 2003, Dynamics of Flexible Multibody Systems with Non-Holonomic Constraints: A Finite Element Approach, Multibody System Dynamics 10, pp.107-123 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024575707338
  19. Schwab, A. L., 2002, Dynamics of Flexible Multibody Systems, Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft
  20. Schwab, A. L. and Meijaard, J. P., 1999, The Belt, Gear, Bearing and Hinge as Special Finite Elements for Kinematic and Dynamic Analysis of Mechanisms and Machines, in Leinonen, T. (ed.), Proceedings of the Tenth World Congress on the Theory of Machines and Mechanisms, IFToMM, June 20-24, 1999, Oulu, Finland, Oulu University Press, Vol 4, pp. 1375-1386
  21. Schwab, A. L. and Meijaard, J. P., 1999, Dynamics of Flexible Multibody Systems having Rolling Contact: Application of the Wheel Element to the Dynamics of Road Vehicles, Vehicle System Dynamics Supplement 33, pp.338-349
  22. Sharp, R. S., 1971, The Stability and Control of Motorcycles, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 13(5), pp. 316-329
  23. Steele, G. L., Jr, 1990. Common Lisp, The Language, 2nd ed., Digital Press, U.S.A.
  24. Timoshenko, S. and Young, D. H., 1948, Advanced Dynamics, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York
  25. Van Der Werff, K., 1977, Kinematic and Dynamic Analysis of Mechanisms, a Finite Element Approach, Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University Press. Delft
  26. Weir, D. H., 1972, Motorcycle Handling Dynamics and Rider Control and the Effect of Design Configuration on Response and Performance, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, LA
  27. Weir, D. H. and Zellner, J. W., 1978, LateralDirectional Motorcycle Dynamics and Rider Control, Technical report 780304, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, P A
  28. Whipple, F. J. W., 1899, The Stability of the Motion of a Bicycle, The Quarterly Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 30, pp. 312-348