DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Uncertain Spatial Data Representation on Multi-source Data Fusion: A Case Study for Landslide Hazard Mapping

  • Park No-Wook (Geoscience Information Center, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources) ;
  • Chi Kwang-Hoon (Geoscience Information Center, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources) ;
  • Kwon Byung-Doo (Department of Earth Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • Published : 2005.10.01

Abstract

As multi-source spatial data fusion mainly deal with various types of spatial data which are specific representations of real world with unequal reliability and incomplete knowledge, proper data representation and uncertainty analysis become more important. In relation to this problem, this paper presents and applies an advanced data representation methodology for different types of spatial data such as categorical and continuous data. To account for the uncertainties of both categorical data and continuous data, fuzzy boundary representation and smoothed kernel density estimation within a fuzzy logic framework are adopted, respectively. To investigate the effects of those data representation on final fusion results, a case study for landslide hazard mapping was carried out on multi-source spatial data sets from Jangheung, Korea. The case study results obtained from the proposed schemes were compared with the results obtained by traditional crisp boundary representation and categorized continuous data representation methods. From the case study results, the proposed scheme showed improved prediction rates than traditional methods and different representation setting resulted in the variation of prediction rates.

Keywords

References

  1. Chung, C. F. and A. G. Fabbri, 1999. Probabilistic prediction models for landslide hazard mapping, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 65(12): 1389-1399
  2. Goovaerts, P., 1997. Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation, Oxford University Press
  3. Moon, W. M., 1990. Integration of geophysical and geological data using evidential belief function, IEEE Transactions Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 28(4): 711-720 https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.1990.572988
  4. Moon, W. M., 1998. Integration and fusion of geological exploration data: a theoretical review of fuzzy logic approach, Geosciences Journal, 2(4): 175-183 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02910163
  5. Park, N. -W., 2004. Multi-source spatial data fusion with geostatistical uncertainty assessment: applications to landslide susceptibility analysis and land-cover classification, Ph.D. Thesis, Seoul National University
  6. Park, N. -W., K. -H. Chi, and B. D. Kwon, 2005. Application of fuzzy information representation using frequency ratio and nonparametric density estimation to multi-source spatial data fusion for landslide hazard mapping, The Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 26(2): 114-128
  7. Park, N. -W., K. -H. Chi, C. F. Chung, and B. D. Kwon, 2003a. Predictive spatial data fusion using fuzzy object representation and integration: application to landslide hazard assessment, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(3): 233-246 https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2003.19.3.233
  8. Park, N. -W., K. -H. Chi, C. F. Chung, and B. D. Kwon, 2003b. GIS-based data-driven geological data integration using fuzzy logic: theory and application, Economic and Environmental Geology, 36(3): 243-255
  9. Parzen, E., 1962. On the estimation of a probability density function and the mode, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33(3): 1065-1076 https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177704472