Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제30권5호
  • /
  • Pages.393-401
  • /
  • 2005
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

레진모형근관에서 엔진구동형 및 수동형 ProTaper 파일로 근관성형 후 근관형태 변화에 대한 비교연구

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE CANAL CONFIGURATION AFTER SHAPING BY PROTAPER ROTARY AND HAND FILES IN RESIN SIMULATED CANALS

  • 양인석 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 강인철 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강미생물학교실, 치의학연구소) ;
  • 황윤찬 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 황인남 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 오원만 (전남대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보존학교실)
  • Yang, In-Seok (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kang, In-Chol (Dept. of Oral Microbiology, School of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Hwang, Yun-Chan (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Hwang, In-Nam (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Won-Mann (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 발행 : 2005.09.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 형태 및 재질이 동일한 엔진구동형 ProTaper파일과 수동형 ProTaper파일을 이용하여 레진모형근관을 성형한 후 근관형태 변화를 비교 분석하고자 시행되었다. 본 연구에서는 레진모형근관으로 총 40개의 J자와 S자의 근관 형태가 재현된 ENDO-TRAINING BLOC을 사용하였다. 근관 성형 기구로는 엔진구동형 Ni-Ti 파일로 $ProTaper^{TM}$, 수동형 Ni-Ti 파일로 $ProTaper^{(R)}$ For Hand Use를 사용하였다. 사용된 레진모형근관과 파일의 종류에 따라 10개씩 4개의 그룹으로 나누어 근관성형을 시행하였다. 근관 성형 전$\cdot$후 이미지를 스캐너 (Color scanner, UMAX Technologies, Inc., USA)를 이용하여 얻은 후. Photoshop 7.0 프로그램 (Adobe System Inc., USA)을 이용하여 이미지를 중첩하였다. 이미지 분석 프로그램 (Image-$Pro^{(R)}$ Plus, Media Cybernetic, USA)을 이용하여 치근단 쪽에서부터 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 및 7 mm 수준에서 근관 성형에 따른 근관의 내측 및 외측 폭경의 변화량, 근관 총폭경의 변화량, 근관 중심축의 변위량을 측정하였다. 또한 근관 성형 시간을 기록하였다. 두 기구 사이의 유의성 검정을 위해 독립 표본 t-검정을 시행하여, 근관 성형 시 수동형 ProTaper 파일이 엔진구동형 ProTaper 파일에 비해 근관 중심축의 변위가 유의하게 덜 일어나며 근관의 원래 형태를 더욱 잘 유지할 수 있지만, 근관 성형시간은 길어질 수 있다는 결론을 얻었다.

The purpose of this study was to compare the canal configuration after shaping by ProTaper rotary files and ProTaper hand files in resin simulated canals. Forty resin simulated canals with a curvature of J-shape and S-shape were divided into four groups by 10 blocks each Simulated root canals in resin block were prepared by ProTaper rotary files and ProTaper hand files using a crown-down pressureless technique All simulated canals were prepared up to size $\#25$ file at end-point of preparation. Pre- and post-instrumentation images were recorded with color scanner. Assessment of canal shape was completed with an image analysis program. Measurements were made at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 mm from the apex. At each level, outer canal width, inner canal width, total canal width, and amount of transportation from original axis were recorded. Instrumentation time was recorded. The data were analyzed statistically using independent t-test. The result was that ProTaper hand files cause significantly less canal transportation from original axis of canal body and maintain original canal configuration better than ProTaper rotary files, however ProTaper hand files take more shaping time.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 18:269-296, 1974
  2. Schilder H. Filling root canals in three dimensions. Dent Clin North Am 11:723-744, 1967
  3. Schneider SW. A comparison of canal prepararion in straight and curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radial Endod 32:271-275, 1971 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(71)90230-1
  4. Walia HM, Brantley WA, Gerstein H. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of Nitinol root canal files. J Endod 14:346-351, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(88)80196-1
  5. Zmener O, Balbachan L. Effectiveness of nickel-titanium files for preparing curved root canals. Endod Dent Traumatol 11:121-123, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1995.tb00472.x
  6. Charles R, Glosson, Robert H, Haller. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine driven. and K-flex endodontic instruments. J Endod 21:146-151, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80441-3
  7. Esposito PT, Cunningham CJ. A comparison of canal preparation with nickel-titanium and stainless steel instruments. J Endod 21:173-176, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80560-1
  8. Yun HH, Kim SK. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 95:228-233, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2003.92
  9. Hata G, Uemura M, Kato AS, Imura N, Novo NF, Toda T. A comparison of shaping ability using ProFile, GT file. and Flex-R endodontic instruments in simulated canals. J Endod 28:316-321, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200204000-00014
  10. Bishop K, Dummer PM. A comparison of stainless steel Flexofiles and nickel-titanium NiTiFlex files during the shaping of simulated canals. Int Endod J 30:25-34, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1997.tb01095.x
  11. Gambill JM, Alder M, del Rio CE. Comparison of nickel-titanium and stainless steel hand-file instrumentation using computed tomography. J Endod 22:369-375, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(96)80221-4
  12. Coleman CL, Svec TA. Analysis of Ni-Ti versus stainless steel instrumentation in resin simulated canals. J Endod 23:232-235, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80053-2
  13. Park H. A comparison of Greater Taper files, ProFiles, and stainless steel files to shape curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Padiol Endod 91:715-718, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.114159
  14. Glickman GN, Koch KA. Twenty-first century endodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 131:39, 2000 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0401
  15. Pruett JP, Clement DJ, Carnes DL Jr. Cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. J Endod 23:77-85, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80250-6
  16. Bonetti FI, Miranda ER, de Toledo LR, del Rio CE. Microscopic evaluation of three endodontic files pre and postinstrumentation. J Endod 24:461-464, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80046-0
  17. Calberson FL, Deroose CAJ, Hommez GM, Raes H, De Moor RJ. Shaping ability of $GT^{TM}$ Rotary Files in simulated resin root canals. Int Endod J 35:607-614, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00540.x
  18. Eldeeb ME, Boraas JC. The effect of different files on the preparation shape of severely curved canals. Int Endod J 18:1-7, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1985.tb00414.x
  19. Lim KC, Webber J. The validity of simulated root canals for the investigation of the prepared root canal shape. Int Endod J 18:240-246, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1985.tb00450.x
  20. Campos JM, del Rio C. Comparison of mechanical and standard hand instrumentation techniques in curved root canals. J Endod 16:230-234, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81677-8
  21. Hulsmann M, Stryga F. Comparison of root canal. preparation using different automated devices and hand instrumentation. J Endod 19:141-145, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80509-1
  22. Christopher JR, Kishor G, Richard TW. Endodontics, third edition, ELSEVIER MOSBY, London, UK, p153-161, 2004
  23. Powell SE, Simon JHS, Maze B. A comparison of the effect of modified and nonmodified instrument tips on apical canal configuration. J Endod 12:293-300, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80111-X
  24. Thompson SA, Dummer PM. Shaping ability of Quantec Series 2000 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals : Part 2. Int Endod J 31:268-274, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.00152.x
  25. Thompson SA, Dummer PM. Shaping ability of Quantec Series 2000 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals : Part 1. Int Endod J 31:259-267, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.00151.x
  26. Griffiths IT, Bryant ST, Dummer PM. Canal shapes produced sequentially during instrumentation with Quantec LX rotary nickel-titanium instruments : a study in simulated canals. Int Endod J 33:346-354, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00311.x
  27. Blum JY, Machtou P, Micallef JP. Location of contact areas on rotary Profile instruments in relationship to the forces developed during mechanical preparation on extracted teeth. Int Endod J 32:108-114, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00200.x