Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

THE EFFECT OF MARGINAL MICROLEAKGE ACCORDING TO THICKNESS OF FLOWBLE RESIN

유동성 레진의 두께가 미세누출에 미치는 영향

  • Song, Gi-Gang (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 송기강 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 조영곤 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2005.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of thickness of flowable resin lining on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations. 80 experimental teeth were prepared with class II preparations with enamel margin or dentin margin. Each group was devided into four groups according to flowable resin lining thickness ; Control group - no flowable resin lining, Group 1 - 0.5 mm flowable resin lining, Group 2 - 1 mm flowable resin lining, Group 3 - 2 mm flowable resin lining. The cavities were restored using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose adhesive system, Filtek Flow and Filtek Z 250 composite resin. Following one day storage in distilled water, the restored teeth were thermocycled for 500 cycles and immersed in $2\%$ methylene blue for 24 hours. The results of this study were as follows : 1. Ranking of mean microleakage scores at the enamel margins was Group 1 < Control = Group 2 < Group 3. The microleakage of Group 3 was significantly higher than that of Control, Group 1 and Group 2 (p < 0.05). 2. Ranking of mean microleakage scores at the dentin margins was Group 1 < Group 2 < Control < Group 3. The microleakage of Group 3 was significantly higher than that of Control, Group 1 (p < 0.05) 3. Compared with microleakage between the enamel and dentin margins, enamel margin group were significantly lower than dentin margin group.

본 연구는 2급 복합레진 수복 시 다양한 두께의 유동성 레진 이장이 법랑질 또는 상아질 치은측 변연부의 미세누출에 미치는 영향을 평가하기 위하여 시행하였다. 발거된 상, 하악 대구치의 근심 또는 원심면에 2급 와동을 형성하고 혼성복합레진만으로 충전한 군 (대조군)과 유동성 레진을 치은측에 0.5 mm (실험 1군), 1 mm (실험 2군), 2 mm (실험 3군) 두께로 이장한 후 복합레진을 충전한 군으로 분류하였다. 각 군은 $5^{\circ}$와 $55^{\circ}C$에서 500회 열순환을 시행한 후 $2\%$ methylene blue에 24시간 동안 침적시켜 광학 입체현미경하에서 변연부의 색소 침투를 관찰하였다. 본 연구의 결과 유동성 레진의 다양한 두께는 복합레진 수복물의 변연부 미세누출에 영향을 미쳤다. 복합레진을 이용한 구치부 2급 와동 수복 시 법랑질 또는 상아질 변연에서 0.5 mm두께로 유동성 레진을 적용하는 것이 미세누출 감소에 효과적인 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Munro GA, Hilton TJ, Hermesch CB. In vitro microleakage of etched and rebonded class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 21:203-208, 1996
  2. Malmstrom H, Schlueter M, Roach T, Moss ME. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 27:373-380, 2002
  3. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ. Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites. J Dent Res 63(2):146-148, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630021001
  4. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swft EJ, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 129:567-577, 1998 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0274
  5. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 26:60-69, 2001
  6. Ashraf ME, Denise E. Microleakage study of flowable composite resin systems. Compend Contin Edu Dent 21(9):705-708, 2000
  7. Lutz F, Krejei I, Schupbach F. Adhesive systems for tooth colored restorations: A review. Schweizer Monat Zahn 103:537-549, 1993
  8. Krejci I, Lutz F, Krejci D. The influence of different base materials on marginal adaptation and wear of conventional class II composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 19:191-198, 1998
  9. John H, Payne IV. The marginal seal of class II restorations: Flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer. J Clin Pediatr Dent 23(2):123-130, 1999
  10. Stephen CB, Jeffrey YT, Edward JS, Perry S, Michelle W. A characterization of first-generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 129:567-577, 1998 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0274
  11. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Composite restorations: influence of flowable and self-curing resin composite lining on microleakage in vitro. Oper Dent 27:569-575, 2002
  12. Yazici AR, Baseren M, Dayangac B. The effect of flowable composite resin on microleakage in class V cavities. Oper Dent 28:42-46, 2003
  13. Chuang SF, Jin YT, Lin TS, Chang CH, Godoy FG. Effect of lining materials on microleakage and internal voids of class II resin-based composite restorations. Am J Dent 16:84-90, 2003
  14. Chuang SF, Liu JK, Chao CC, Liao FP, Chen YHM. Effect of flowable composite lining and operator experience on micoleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 85:177-183, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.113780
  15. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent Res 66(11):1636-1639, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660110601
  16. Ralph W, Philips DS. Observation on a composite resin for class II restoration: Two-year report. Oper Dent 20:241-245, 1995
  17. Gordon M, Plasschaert AJM, Saiku JM, Pelzner RB. Microleakage of posterior composite resin materials and an experimental urethane restorative material, tested in vitro above and below the cementoenamel junction. Quintessence Int 17(1):11-15, 1986
  18. Roberta BA, Mario CS, Lourenco CS, Simonides C. Effect of resin liners on microleakage of class V dental composite restorations. J Appl Oral Sci 12(1):1-11. 2004
  19. 권혁춘.김진우.노병덕.문주후.박상진.박성호.박정원.손호현.신동호.엄정문.윤태철.이광원.이수종.정일영.조경모.조병훈.조영곤.최경규.허복.황인남. 치과보존학. 신흥인터내셔날, 서울, p99-104, 2001
  20. Gary L, William H. Flowable resin composites as 'filled adhesives': Literature review and clinical recommendations. Quintessence Int 30:249-257, 1999
  21. Civelek M, Erosy M, L'Hotelier E, Soyman M, Say EC. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage in class II cavities of various resin composites. Oper Dent 28(5):635-641, 2003
  22. Watts and Cash. The method for determining volumetric shrinkage. Meas Sci Technol 2:788-794, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/2/8/013
  23. Cristiane MA, Anderson TH. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in class V composite restorations. Am J Dent 14(1):31-33, 2001
  24. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 23:244-249, 1998
  25. Chuang SF, Jin YT, Liu JK, Chang CH, Shieh DB. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 29(3):301-308, 2004
  26. Francis F, Wayne W, Denise E. In vitro microleakage study of a condensable and flowable composite resin. Gen Dent 48(6):711-715, 2000
  27. Peris AR, Duarte S, Andrade MF. Evaluation of marginal microleakage in class II cavities: Effect of microhybrid, flowable, and compactable resins. Quintessence Int 34:93-98, 2003
  28. Fayyad MA, Shortall AC. Microleakage of dentin-bonded posterior composite restoration, J Dent 15(2):67-72, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(87)90002-9