DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

거제시 계룡산의 편백군락에 관한 생태학적 연구

Ecological Studies on the Vegetation of Chamaecyparis obtusa Community at Mt. Gyeryoung in Geoje­city

  • 허만규 (동의대학교 분자생물학과) ;
  • 최주수 (동의대학교 분자생물학과) ;
  • 문성기 (경성대학교 생물학과)
  • Huh Man Kyu (Division of Molecular Biology, Dongeui University) ;
  • Choi Joo-Soo (Division of Molecular Biology, Dongeui University) ;
  • Moon Sung Gi (Depart. Of Biology, Kyungsung University)
  • 발행 : 2005.06.01

초록

본 조사 지역은 도심의 자연공간이 비록 인위적 조성이긴 하나 질적 및 양적으로 식생이 양호하게 잘 관리할 수 있음을 단적으로 보여 주었다. 식물상은 광범위한 조사 지역이 아님에도 불구하고 세 가지 특징이 있다. 첫째는 교과서적인 이차림에 의한 군락이 매우 양호하다는 점이다. 그러나 자연지역에서는 군락 형성이 미미했다. 둘째는 다양도는 자연집단에서는 높게 나타나고 조림지에서는 낮았다. 셋째, 자연 식생과 조림지의 종조성, 종다양도, 산림의 생산력에서 확연히 차이가 드러났다.

The characters of Chamaecyparis obtusa community extended around the Mt. Gyeryoung in Geoje-cik were investigated for several ecological parameters and the results can be summarized as fellows. Chamaecyparis obtusa is prevailing in the plantation area, whereas Pinus densiflora and Quercus mongolica are prevailing in its outskirts. Plant biomass and net production which estimated from degree of green naturality and Miami's model were much higher in the plantation than those of the natural forest. However, the mean species diversity of plantation was lower than that of natural populations. In stratification of investigated areas, overstory tree layer was dominant in the zone of plantation and dominant layers in the natural forest were understory tree layer, shrub, and herb.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brown-Blanquet, J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie, grundziige der vegetationskunde. pp. 865, Springer, Wein, New York
  2. Daehler, C. C. 2003. Performance comparisons of co-occurring native and alien invasive plants: Implications for conservation and restoation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 304, 183-211
  3. Ellenberg, H. 1956. Grundlagen der vegetationsgliederung, 1, aufgaben und methoden der vegetationskunde. Stuttgarrt
  4. Kil, B. S., C. H. Kim and K W. Yun. 1995. The vegetation of the northern slope area of Mt. Pangtae. The Report the KACN. 35, 53-104
  5. Kimmins, J. P. 1987. Forest Ecology. pp. 531, Macmillan
  6. Legendre, P., M. R. T. Dale, M. J. Fortin, P. Cas grain and J. Guveritch. 2004. Effects of spatial structures on the results of field experiments. Ecology 85, 3202-3214 https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0677
  7. Leith, H. 1972. Uber die Prirnarproduktion der pflanzendecke der Erde. Z. Angew. Bot. 46, 1-37
  8. Leith, H. 1973. Primary production: Terrestial ecosystems. Human Ecol. 1, 303-332 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01536729
  9. Magalef, R. 1968. Perspectives in Ecological Theory. pp. 111, Chicago
  10. Oppenheimer, M. 1995. Context, connection, and opportunity in environmental problem solving. Envronment 37, 10-15
  11. Pielou, E. C. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collection, J. Theoret. Biol. 13, 131-144 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0
  12. Pielou, E. C. 1975. Ecology Diversity. pp. 165, Wiley, New York
  13. Pyke, C. R. 2004. Habitat loss confounds climate change impacts. Frontiers in Ecol. and Environ. 2, 178-182 https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0178:HLCCCI]2.0.CO;2
  14. Shannon, C. E. and W. Weaver. 1963. The measurement theory of communication. pp. 1-117, Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana
  15. Sonensen, T. 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant siology based on similarity of species content. Detkon. Denske. Vidensk, Biol. Skr., 5, 1-34
  16. Wiser, S. K., R. B. Allen, P. W. Clinton and K. H. Plath. 1998. Community structure and forest invasion by an exotic herb over 23 years. Ecology, 79, 2071-2081 https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2071:CSAFIB]2.0.CO;2