Design Optimization of Auto-body Members for Crashworthiness Enhancement with the Response Surface Method

반응표면법을 이용한 차체 부재의 충돌성능 향상을 위한 설계 최적화

  • Na Sungyul (Samsung Electronics Corporation) ;
  • Song Junghan (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Huh Hoon (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim Hyunsub (Kia Motor Corporation)
  • 나승렬 (삼성전자 메카트로닉스 센터) ;
  • 송정한 (한국과학기술원 기계공학과) ;
  • 허훈 (한국과학기술원 기계공학과) ;
  • 김현섭 (기아자동차 차체설계3팀)
  • Published : 2005.07.01

Abstract

The response surface method is the statistical method which can be applied to the non-sensitivity based optimization. The response surface which is constructed by the least square method contains only the polynomial terms so that the global maximum and minimum points are easily obtained. In this paper, this response surface method is utilized to optimize the crashworthiness of auto-body members. As the first step, the thickness of a simple circular tube is optimized to confirm the application of the response surface method to the crashworthiness. Optimization of the thickness on the front side member is, then, performed with the constructed response surface of the absorbed energy and deformation. Optimization results demonstrate that the absorbed energy and the deformation pattern of the front side member is improved in the viewpoint of enhancement of the crashworthiness.

Keywords

References

  1. G. E. P. Box and K. B. Willson, 'On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions,' Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, Vol.13, pp.1-14, 1951
  2. D. M. Allen, 'Mean Square Error of Prediction as a Criterion for Selecting Variables,' Technometrics, Vol.13, pp.469-475, 1971 https://doi.org/10.2307/1267161
  3. D. M. Allen, 'The Relation Between Variable Selection and Data Augmentation and a Method for Prediction,' Technometrics, Vol.16, pp.125- 127, 1974 https://doi.org/10.2307/1267500
  4. G. A. F. Seber, Linear Regression Analysis, John Willey, New York, 1977
  5. K. Yamazaki and J. Han, 'Maximization of the Crushing Energy Absorption of Cylindrical Shells,' Advances in Engineering Software 31, pp.425-434, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9978(00)00004-1
  6. H. Kurtaran, A. Eskandarian, D. Marzougui, and N. E. Bedewi, 'Crashworthiness Design Optimization Using Successive Response Surface Approximations,' Computational Mechanics, Vol.29, pp.409-421, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-002-0351-x
  7. M. Avalle, G. Chiandussi and G. Belingardi, 'Design Optimization by Response Surface Methodology : Application to Crashworthiness Design of Vehicle Structures,' Struct. M ultidisc. Optim., Vol.24, pp.325-332, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-002-0243-x
  8. E. P. Hong, M. K. Shin and G. J. Park, 'Determination of Crash Pulse to Minimize Injuries of Occupants and Optimization of Crash Components Using Response Surface Method,' Transactions of KSAE, Vol.9, No.2, pp.116-129, 2001
  9. S. D. Pyun, S. B. Lee and H. J. Yim, 'A Study on Design Optimization System for Thin Walled Beam Structures,' Transactions of KSAE, Vol.8, No.6, pp.238-246, 2000
  10. H. Huh, J. H. Lim, J. H. song, K. S. Lee, Y. W. Lee and S. S. Han, 'Crashworthiness Assessment of Side Impact of an Auto-Body with 60TRIP Steel for Side Members,' Int. J. Automotive Technology, Vol.4, No.3, pp.149-156, 2003