화학물질 우선순위 선정 기법(CRS-Korea)의 개발과 적용

Development of Korean Chemical Ranking and Scoring System (CRS-Korea) and its Application to Prioritizing National Toxic Chemicals

  • 발행 : 2005.06.01

초록

A chemical ranking and scoring (CRS-Korea) system was developed and proposed to use as the first step to prioritize the toxic chemicals for the purpose of monitoring and detailed risk assessment that might follow as necessary. The CRS-Korea system takes a basic concept of risk assessment (both human health risk and ecological risk) in that risk score is determined by the product of toxicity score and exposure score. Included in the toxicity category are acute toxicity, chronic/sub -chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity, and other toxicity. The exposure category consists of quantity released to the environment, bioconcentration, and persistence. A consistent scheme and a comprehensive chemical data base are offered in the CRS-Korea system to calculate a score for the each component in the two categories by using specific physicochemical, fate, and toxic properties and the quantity of the chemical used. The toxicity score is obtained by adding up all the individual scores for the components in the toxicity category. The exposure score is determined by multiplication of the score of the quantity released with the sum of persistent score and bioconcentration score. Equal weight is given to the toxicity score and the exposure score. As the CRS-Korea system was applied to identify 50 national priority chemicals, it was found that significant data gap exists on toxicity and fate properties and that the uncertainty associated with estimating the quantify released to the environment is notably high. The proposed CRS system is only a screening tool in the first step toward the priority setting and should be used with expert judgement and other considerations necessary.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 국립환경연구원. 화학물질 관리 체계 개선을 위한 기반 연구, 1996
  2. 김예신, 박화성, 이동수, 신동천. 화학물질 우선순위 선정 기법에 대한 비교 분석, 한국환경독성학회지 2003; 18(3): 183-191
  3. 박화성, 김예신, 이동수, 신동천. 대기중 유해 화학 물질의 인체 위해도우선순위 선정 연구, 한국환경독성학회지 2004; 19(1): 81-91
  4. 연세대학교 환경공해연구소 위해우려물질 선정 및 평가 연구, 환경부 2003
  5. 환경부. 유해화학물질관리법, 2004
  6. 환경부. 화학물질정보센터(KCIC, Korean Chemicals Information Center). http://kcic.nier.go.kr/, 2003
  7. 환경부. 유독물 사용실적 보고(1999-2001), 2002
  8. Environment Canada. The ARET substance selection process and guideline, 1994
  9. Environmental Canada. www.ec.gc.ca/ARET. 2003
  10. Erin MS, Shane AS, John PG et al. SCRAM: A Scoring and Ranking System for Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic Substances for the North American Great Lakes-Part I : Structure of the Scoring and Ranking System, Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2000; 7(1): 1-11 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02987640
  11. EU (European Union). IUCLID (International Uniform-Chemical Information Database), 1996
  12. Gary AD, Mary BS and Sheila J. Comparative evaluation of chemical ranking and scoring methodologies, US EPA 1994
  13. Hansen BG, Haelst AL et al. Priority setting for existing chemicals: The European Union risk ranking method, Environmental Toxicity and chemistry 1999; 18: 772-779 https://doi.org/10.1897/1551-5028(1999)018<0772:PSFECE>2.3.CO;2
  14. HSDB (Hazardous Substances Data Bank). http://toxnet. nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/htmlgen?HSDB, 2003
  15. IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). httpt//www.iarc.fr/, 2003
  16. Mary BS and Adam CS. Chemical ranking and scoring: Guidelines for relative assessment of chemicals, SETAC press 1997a
  17. Mary BS, Gary AD, Lori EK, Terry WS, John EB, Sheila LJ and Emma LG. A screening method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 1997b; 16(2): 372-383 https://doi.org/10.1897/1551-5028(1997)016<0372:ASMFRA>2.3.CO;2
  18. NTP (Natioanl Toxicology Program). http://ntp-server.niehs.nih.gov/, 2003
  19. Rachel RM, Cheryl LS, Shari AB et al. SCRAM: A Scoring and Ranking System for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic Substances for the north american great lakes resulting chemical scores and ran kings, Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 2002; 8(3): 537-557 https://doi.org/10.1080/10807030290879817
  20. US EPA IRIS. www.epa.gov/iris, 2003
  21. US EPA. Comparative evaluation of chemical ranking and scoring methodology, 1994a
  22. US EPA. Chemical hazard evaluation for management strategies; A method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts, 1994b
  23. US EPA. EPIWIN (Estimation Programs Interface for Windows), 2000