Effect of Omentum, Pleura, Diaphragm on Tracheal Autograft Survival

자가이식기관의 생존에 필요한 장막, 흉막, 횡격막의 역할 분석

  • Keum, Dong-Yoon (Department of Thoracic & Cardiovascular Surgery, College of Medicine, Keimyung University)
  • 금도윤 (계명대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실)
  • Published : 2005.07.01

Abstract

Pleura, diaphragm, pericardial fat pad, intercostal muscles and omentum can be used to protect and revascularize the bronchial suture line of tracheal transplantation, lung transplantation and pulmonary resection. The purpose of the present study is to compare the influence of the pleura, diaphragm and omentum in survival of isolated tracheal segments in the experimental animals. Material and Method: Sprague-Dawley rats weighing 250- 350g were used. The animals were divided in three groups; the pleura, omentum and diaphragm. Following intraperitoneal anesthesia, endotracheal intubation was performed. Then the trachea was exposed. A three-ring sec- tion of cervical trachea was excised. The resected trachea was implanted at each sites. After 2 weeks, rats were sacrificed. Histopathological examination of the tracheal segments was performed. For comparison of each groups, histopathological viability of resected tracheal segment was scored by three tissue layers; epithelium, submucosa, and cartilage. The results were presented as average score. Result: In histopathological examination, submucosa and cartilage using tracheal segment necrosis scoring system. The pleural group showed well preserved tissue. There was minimal necrosis and inflammation compared with other groups. In the pleural group, tracheal necrosis scores were $2.17\pm0.983$at epithelium, $1.67\pm0.516$ at submucosa and $2.17\pm0.753$ at cartilage. At the omental group, scores were $1.00\pm0.00,\;1.60\pm0.548\;and\;1.80\m0.447$. In the diaphragmatic group, scores were $1.40:\pm0.894,\;2.40\pm0.547\;and\;2.20\pm0.447$. Total necrosis score were $6.00\pm1.789$ in the pleural group, $4.40\pm0.894$ in the omental group and $6.00\pm1.414$ in the diaphragmatic group. Conclusion: There were no significant viability differences in terms of total necrosis score for the viability of resected tracheal segment. But the best result was achieved in the omental group. Therefore, omental wrapping on tracheal graft site will be beneficial for the prevention of graft necrosis.

기관 또는 기관지의 이식이나 기관문합술 후 그리고 폐절제술 후 기관지의 봉합면에 빠른 재혈관화를 통해 감염이나 허혈성 괴사를 막기위해 흉막, 심외막, 심외지방, 횡격막, 장막, 늑간 근육 등을 이용하여 보강해 주는 경우가 많다. 이 연구는 실험동물에서 자가기관을 흉막, 장막 및 횡경막에 이식했을 때 생존에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 실험동물로 무게는 $250\~350g$ 정도의 Sprague-Dawley rats가 사용되었다. 장막, 횡격막, 흉막 세 군으로 나누어서 각 군별로 5마리씩 실험하였다. 복막 내 마취 후 기관 삽관을 시행하였고 기관을 노출시켜 세마디의 기관이식편을 잘라내었다 잘라낸 기관을 장막, 횡격막, 흉막에 각각 이식하였고 2주 후 쥐를 희생시켜 얻은 조직으로 병리조직학적 검사를 하였다. 병리조직학적으로 절단기관편의 생존능력을 비교하기 위하여 각각의 상피조직, 점막하조직, 연골조직의 괴사정도를 점수화하여($0\~3$점) 그 결과의 평균값을 표시하였다. 결과 : 병리 조직학적 검사상 장막군이 가장 좋은 보존 상태를 보였다. 괴사 점수는 흉막이식군에서 상피층서 $2.17\pm0.983$, 점막하층 $1.67\pm0.516$, 연골층 $2.17\pm0.753$으로 나타났고 장막이식군의 경우 각각 1.00\pm0.00,\;1.60\pm0.548,\;1.8\m0.447$, 횡격막이식군은 $1.40\pm0.894,\;2.40\pm0.547,\;2.2\pm0.447$으로 관찰되었다. 전체 괴사 점수는 흉막이식군에서 $6.00\pm1.789$, 장막이식군에서 $4.40\pm0.894$, 횡격막이식군에서 $6.00\pm1.414$보였다. 걸론: 세 그룹간의 비교시 통계적 유의성은 없었으나 장막에 이식한 기관에서 가장 낮은 괴사점수가 나와 장막이 횡격막이나 흉막보다 기간 봉합면을 보호하고 신혈관 생성에 더 좋은 역할을 하는 경향을 보였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Waters PF. Pneumonectomy. In: Pearson FG, Deslauriers J, Ginsberg RJ. Thoracic surgery. 2nd ed. New York: Churchill livingstone 2002;974-81
  2. Li J, Xu P, Chen H, Yang Z, Zhang Q. Improvement of tracheal autograft survival with transplantation into the greater omentum. Ann Thoracic Surg 1995;60:1592-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)00839-X
  3. Zonuzi F, Ercan S, Cakalagaoglu F, Yuksel M. Comparison of omentum, pleura and diaphragm for tracheal autograft survival in rats. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:392-94 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(99)00232-8
  4. Neville WE, Bolanoski PJP, Scoltazadeh H. Homograft replacement of the trachea using immunosuppression. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1976;72:596-601
  5. Morgan E, Lima O, Goldberg M, Ferdman A, Luk SK, Cooper JD. Successful revascularization of totally ischemic bronchial autografts with omental pedicle flaps in dogs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982;84:204-10
  6. Rose KG, Sesterhenn K, Wustrow F. Tracheal allotransplantation in man. Lancet 1979;1:433 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)95352-3
  7. Balderman SC, Weinblatt G. Tracheal autograft revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1987;94:434-41
  8. Moriyama S, Shimizu N, Teramoto S. Experimental tracheal allotransplantation using omentopexy. Transplant Proc 1989; 21:2596-600
  9. Nakanishi R, Shirakusa T, Takahi T. Omentopexy for tracheal autografts. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:841-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(94)90186-4
  10. Nakanishi R, Shirakusa T, Mitsudomi T. Maximum length of tracheal autografts in dogs. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993; 106:1081-7
  11. Delaere PR, Liu ZY, Feenstra L. Tracheal autograft revascularization and transplantation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1994;120:1130-6 https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1994.01880340070012
  12. Delaere PR, Liu ZY, Hermans R, Sciot R, Feenstra L. Experimental tracheal allograft revascularization and transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;110:728-37 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70105-2
  13. Virkkula L, Ecrola S. Use of omental pedicle for treatment of bronchial fistula after lower lobectomy. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1975;9:287-90 https://doi.org/10.3109/14017437509138653
  14. Goldsmith HSHS, Griffith AL, Kupferman A, Catsinpoolas N. Lipid angiogenic factor from omentum. J Am Med Assco 1987;252:2034-6
  15. Mineo TC, Amborgi V. Early closure of the postpneumonectomy bronchopleural fistula by pedicled diaphragmatic flaps. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:714-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(95)00539-W
  16. Lyman AB, Angel FB. Experience with the pedicled pericardial fat graft reinforcement. Am J Surg 1995;89:331-46 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9610(55)90073-8
  17. Li J, Xu P, Chen H. Successful tracheal autotransplantation with two-stage approach using the greater omentum. Ann Thorac Surg 1997;64:199-202 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(97)82828-7
  18. Schaffers HJ, Cooper JD, Patterson GA. Toronto lung transplantation group. Airway complications following lung transplantation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988;137:214
  19. Mayer E, Cardoso PFG, Puskas JD, et al. The effect of basic fibroblast growth factor and omentopexy on revascularization and epithelial regeneration of heterotopic rat tracheal isografts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:180-8
  20. Albes JM, Klenzner T, Kotzerke J, Thiedemann KU, Schafers HJ, Borst HG. Improvement of tracheal autograft revascularization by means of fibroblast growth factor. Ann Thorac Surg 1994;57:444-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(94)91015-4
  21. Sung SW, Won T. Effects of basic fibroblast growth factor on early revascularization and epithelial regeneration in rabbit tracheal orthotopic transplanation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2001;19:14-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(00)00624-2