Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지

The Pluralistic Development of Postmodern Landscape Design

포스트모던 조경설계의 다원적 전개 양상

  • Kim, Han-Bai (School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape Architecture, The University of Seoul)
  • 김한배 (서울시립대 건축도시조경학부)
  • Published : 2005.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The styles of contemporary landscape design have diversified since the emergence of Postmodernism in landscape architecture. The diversification was mostly influenced by contemporary fine arts and architecture. This study examines the pluralistic development of Postmodern landscape design through the investigation of the influences from those sister arts. In this point of view, the main approaches of Postmodern landscape design are thought to be classified into three categories;'the formal abstract approach', 'the figurative approach' and 'the new picturesque approach'. The first category of the formal abstract approach was formulated with the concepts and vocabulary of Minimal Art and Installation Art. Its representative icons such as 'point grids' and 'stripes', and the main concepts such as the sense of 'flahess', 'expansion' and 'materiality' are mostly thought to be originated from these art forms. The second category of the figurative approach is characterised by the concepts and vocabulary of Pop Art and New Image Paintings. Its representative icons such as 'map' or 'figurative forms' and main concepts like the sense of 'reality', 'context' and 'symbolism' are mostly thought to be originated from these art forms. The third category of the new picturesque approach was formulated with the concepts and vocabulary of Land Art and Late Deconstructive Architecture. Its representative icons such as 'hybrid', 'layer' and 'fold', and the main concepts such as the sense of 'complexity', 'continuity' and 'reversibility' are thought to be originated from these art forms. The research shows that the main stream of contemporary landscape design seems to be gradually moving toward the second and third approach above, in step with the cultural orientation and the dynamism of contemporary urban life. Therefore, the study focused especially on the new picturesque approach which would be in greater need for coping with the hybrid culture today.

Keywords

References

  1. 김영대(1993) 모더니즘과 그 이후의 세계적 조경의 흐름에 관한 한 시각. 월간 환경과 조경. 1993. 11
  2. 김재관(1996) '그리드Grid'의 형성과 해체에 관한 연구. 흥익대대학원 박사학위논문
  3. 김진희(1995) 영국풍경식정원의 미 '픽춰레스크'에 관한 연구, 서울대 대학원 석사학위논문
  4. 김한배(2001) 모더니즘 조경설계에 미친 미술의 영향에 관한연구. 한국조경학회지 29(4): 53-66
  5. 방근택 편(1992a) 세계미술대사전 서양미술(IV)-네오다다이즘 -반(反)표현주의-. 서울: 한국미술년감사
  6. 방근택 편(1992b) 세계미술대사전 서양미술(V)-미니멀아트 -용어사전-. 서울: 한국미술년감사
  7. 배정한(2004) 현대조경설계의 이론과 쟁점. 서울: 도서출판 조경
  8. 변우일(1994) 조경설계론-제음스와인즈와 푸른 건축-. 서울:도서출판 동별당
  9. 서성록(1995) 설치미술감상법. 서울: 대원사
  10. 안승홍(1996) 현대조경설계에 나타난 미니멀리즘의 재현에 관한 연구. 서울대 환경대학원 석사학위논문
  11. 이영화(2001) 감성공간사. 서울: 한불문화출판
  12. 이종건(1999) 해체주의 건축의 해체. 서울: 도서출판 발언
  13. 임석재(1999) 미니멀리즘과 상대주의 공간. 서울: 시공사
  14. 조경진(2003) 프레데러 로 옴스테드의 도시공원관에 대한 재해석. 한국조경학회지 30(6): 26-37
  15. 조택연(2002) 디지털문명이 건축을 변혁시킨다. 지식의 최전선. 서울: 한길사
  16. 차태욱(1993) 모더니즘 이후에 나타나는 조경의 새로운 흐름에 관한 연구. 서울대 환경대학원 석사학위논문
  17. Atkins, R.(1990) 박진선 역(1994) 현대미술의 개념풀이(Art Speakes) 서울: 시공사
  18. Batchelor, D.(1997) Minimalism. Cambridge, UK, University of Cambridge Press
  19. Beardsley, J.(1996) 'Entrophy and the New Landscape". Process Architecture(1996), Hargreaves: Landscape Works, Tokyo. Process Architecture Co.. Ltd.. pp. 14-28
  20. Beardsley. J.(1998) Earthwork and Beyond -. Third Edition. New York, Cross River Press. Ltd
  21. Bradley-Hole, C.(1999) The Mimmalist Garden. New York. The Monacelli Press
  22. Bru. E.(1997) New Landscape. Barcelona, Museum of Contemporary Art
  23. Comer. J.(1999) Introduction, Recovering Landscape. NY, Pnnceton Architectural Press
  24. Cosgrove. D. edit. (1999) Mapping. Reaktion Books Ltd
  25. Godfrey, T.저 배경숙 역(1992) 신표현주의(New Image). 서울:열화당
  26. Gueze. A.(1993) Moving Beyond Darwm. Modern Park Design, Amsterdam: THOTH publishers
  27. Hargreaves, G.(1983) Post Modernism Looks Beyond Itself. Landscape Architecture July/August 1983, pp 60-65
  28. Huet. B.(1993) Park Design and Urban Continuity. Modern Park design. Amsterdam: THOTH publishers
  29. Imperiale, A.(2000) New Flatness: Surface Tension in digital Architecture. Basel, Birkhauser-Publishers for Archi tecture
  30. Jencks. C.(1990) The New Modems. London. Academy Editions
  31. Jencks, C.(1995) The Architecture of the Jumping Universe. London, Academy Edition
  32. Johnson. J.(1991) Modem Landscape Architecture. New York. Abbeville Press
  33. Krauss. R.(1979) 박신의 역(1987) 조각영역의 확장(Sculp-ture in the Expanded Field). 현대미술비평 30선. 계간미술 편. 중앙일보사, pp. 204-210
  34. Landecker, H.(1992) 'Sir Geoffrey Gellicoe: Unity among All Things", Profiles in Landscape Architecture. Washing-ton, D.C., America Society of Landscape Architecture
  35. Levy. L.(1997) "Dialogue with the Land: The Art of Peter Walker". Walker, P. eds, (1997) Minimalist Gardens. Wa-shington, D.C., Spacemeker Press
  36. Lyall. S.(1991) Designing the New Landscape. London Thames and Hudson Ltd
  37. Louwerse. D.(1993) Why Talk about Park Design? Modern Park Design, Amsterdam: THOTH publishers
  38. Meyer. E. K.(1997) "Tranafiguration of the Commonplace", Martha Schwartz: Transfiguration of the Commonplace. edited by Spacemaker Press. Washington. D.C., Spacema-ker Press
  39. Muschamp, H.(1993) "Mission into Space". Emilio Ambasz: 1986-1992. edited by A+U (April 1993 special issue). Tokyo, A+U Co.,Ltd
  40. Olin. L.(1988) "Form, Meaning and Expression in Landscape Architecture". Landscape Journal (Fall 1988), pp.149-167
  41. Rademacher, S.(1996) "Introduction: Toward Site Speci-ficity". Process Architecture eds.(1996) Hargreaves: Land-scape Works. Tokyo, Process Architecture Co., Ltd.. pp. 8-13
  42. Rosenblum. R.(1991) "Towards a Definition of New Art". New Art, edited by Papadakis A. et al., New York, Rizzoli International Publications Inc
  43. Rowe, P. G.(1994) "With Time in Mind". Design with the Land: Landscape Architecture of Michael van Valkenburgh. edited by Harvard University Graduate School of Design. Princeton Architectural Press. pp. iv-v
  44. Schwartz, M.(1993) "Landscape and Common Culture since Modemism". Modern Landscape Architecture, edited by Treib, M., Cambridge. Massachusetts. The MIT Press, pp. 26-265
  45. Thompson. J. W.(1992) "Peter Walker: A Passion for Restraint". Profiles in Landscape Architecture, edited by ASLA, Easton. Maryland. Waverly Press. pp. 84-91
  46. Turner. T.(1996) City as Landscape. London. E&FN SPON
  47. Walker. P., and M. Simo (1994) Invisible Gardens. Cambri-dge, MA. MIT Press
  48. Walker. P.(1997) "Classicism. Modernism and Minimalism in the Landscape". Designed Landscape Forum 1, Designed Landscape Forum eds.(1998). Washington, D.C., Spacemaker Press, pp. 17-24
  49. Wall. A.(1999) Programmming the Urban Surface. Corner. J. edit. (1999), Recovering Landscape, New York. Princeton Architectural Press
  50. Wines, J.(1986) SITE. edited by A+U. Tokyo, A+U Co., Ltd
  51. Wines. J.(1995) "Between Archiotecture and Landscape". Landscape Architecture (May 1995), pp.34-36
  52. Zoh. Kyung-Jin (1993) An Exploration of Postmodernism in Contemporary Western Landscape Architecture. 한국조경 학회지 21(1): 107-124