축산폐수 생물학적 처리수의 후처리를 위한 물리·화학적 단위 공정 비교

Comparisons of Physical and Chemical Methods for Dealing with Biologically Pre-Treated Livestock Wastewater as a Post-Treatment

  • 최용수 (한국과학기술연구원 수질환경 및 복원연구센터) ;
  • 홍석원 (한국과학기술연구원 수질환경 및 복원연구센터) ;
  • 권기한 (한국과학기술연구원 수질환경 및 복원연구센터) ;
  • 정일호 ((주) 대경엔텍)
  • Choi, Yong-Su (Water Environment and Remediation Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Hong, Seok-Won (Water Environment and Remediation Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kwon, Gi-han (Water Environment and Remediation Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology) ;
  • Jung, Il-Ho (Dae Kyung En-Tech. Co., Ltd.)
  • 발행 : 2004.03.30

초록

The combination of biological and physical/chemical technologies is a promising technique to reduce highly concentrated pollutants in livestock wastewater. It is suggested to treat livestock wastewater efficiently as follows: firstly, biodegradable organic matters, nitrogen and some of phosphorus should be removed by a biological treatment process and then residual non-biodegradable organic matters, color and phosphorus be eliminated by physicochemical technologies. In this study, therefore, the integrations of chemical coagulation, activated carbon adsorption, Fenton oxidation and ozonation were evaluated to provide appropriate post-treatment processes for biologically pre-treated livestock wastewater. After chemical coagulation followed by ozonation or Fenton oxidation process, the quality of treated wastewater could meet the discharge limit in Korea. However, a yellowish brown color still remained in the treated wastewater after a single method such as coagulation and Fenton oxidation was applied. The ozonation was found to be the most effective technology for the decolorization. Neither simple biological nor physicochemical treatment provides adequate decolorization and sufficient depletion of organics in livestock wastewater so far. Consequently, the integration of Fenton oxidation and ozonation with a biological treatment process is recommended to treat livestock wastewater in terms of removal efficiency.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 국무총리 수질개선 기획단, 제2차 물관리정책토론회 발표자료 (2001)
  2. Ledakowicz, S., Solecka, M., and Zylla, R., Biodegradation, Decolourisation and Detoxification of Textile Wastewater Enhanced by Advanced Oxidation Processes, Journal of Biotechnology, 89(2-3), pp. 175-184 (2001)
  3. Beltran-Heredia, J, Torregrosa, J., Dominguez, J. R., and Peres, J. A. (2001) Comparison of the Degradation of p-hydroxybenzoic Acid in Aqueous Solution by Several Oxidation Processes, Chemosphere, 42(4), pp. 351-359 (2001)
  4. Lee, Y., Lee, C., and Yoon, J., High Temperature Dependence of 2,4-dichlorophen- Oxyacetic Acid Degradation by Fe$^{3+}$/$H_{2}$$O_{2}$ System, Chemosphere, 51(9), pp. 963-971 (2003)
  5. Guedes, A., Madeira, L. M. P., Boaventura, R. A. R., and Costa, C. A. V., Fenton Oxidation of Cork Cooking Wastewater Overall Kinetic Analysis, Water Res., 37(13), pp. 3061-3069 (2003)
  6. Rivas, F. J., Beltran, F. J., Gimeno, O., and Alvarez, P., Optimisation of Fenton's Reagent Usage as a Pre-Treatment for Fermentation Brines, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 96(2-3), pp. 277-290 (2003)
  7. Koch, M., Yediler, A., Lienert, D., Insel, G., and Kettrup, A., Ozonation of Hydrolyzed Azo Dye Reactive Yellow 84 (CI), Chemosphere, 46(1), pp. 109-113 (2002)
  8. Arslan I., Treatability of a Simulated Disperse Dye-Bath by Ferrous Iron Coagulation, Ozonation, and Ferrous Iron-Catalyzed Ozonation, Jour. Hazardous Materials, 85, pp. 229-241 (2001)
  9. Contreras, S., Fodrigez, M., Esplugas, S., and Casado, J., Oxidation of Nitrobenzene by $O_{3}$/UV: the Influence of $H_{2}$$O_{2}$ and Fe(II). Experiences in a Pilot Plant. Wat. Sci. & Tech., 44(5), pp 39-46 (2001)
  10. Maletzky, P., and Bauer, R., The Photo-Fenton Method-Degradation of Nitrogen Containing Organic Compounds. Chemosphere, 37(5), pp. 899-909 (1998)
  11. Mohanty, N. R., and Wei, I. W., Oxidation of 2,4-dinitrotoluene using Fenton's Reagent: Reaction Mechanisms and Their Practical Applications, Hazardous Waste & Hazardous Materials, 10(2), pp. 171-184 (1993)