Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy (식물분류학회지)

The Korean Society of Plant Taxonomists (한국식물분류학회)
권호 표지

Interspecific relationships of Korean Viola based on RAPD, ISSR and PCR-RFLP analyses

RAPD, ISSR과 PCR-RFLP를 이용한 한국산 제비꽃속(Viola)의 종간 유연관계

  • Yoo, Ki-Oug (Division of Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Lee, Woo-Tchul (Division of Life Sciences, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kwon, Oh-Keun (National Horticultural Research Institute, RDA)
  • 유기억 (강원대학교 자연과학대학 생명과학부) ;
  • 이우철 (강원대학교 자연과학대학 생명과학부) ;
  • 권오근 (농촌진흥청 원예연구소)
  • Received : 2004.02.20
  • Accepted : 2004.02.27
  • Published : 2004.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Molecular taxonomic studies were conducted to evaluate interspecific relationships in Korean Viola 34 taxa including two Japanese populations using RAPD(randornly amplified polymorphic DNA), ISSR(inter simple sequence repeat) and PCR-RFLP(restriction fragment length polymorphism) analysis. Only six and four primers out of 40 arbitrary and 12 ISSR primers were screened for 34 taxa, and were revealed 70 (98.6%) and 28 (96.6%) polymorphic bands, respectively. Fifteen restriction endonucleases produced 80 restriction sites and size variations from the large single copy region of cpDNA, 16 (20%) of which were polymorphic. The separate analyses from the RAPD, ISSR and PCR-RFLP data were incongruent in the relationships among 34 taxa, but combined data was in accordance with previous infrageneric classification system based on morphological characters, especially the subsection and series level. Section Chamaemelanium placed between subsect. Patellares and Vagimtae of section Nomimium was not formed as a distinct group. Viola alb ida complex including three very closely related taxa was recognized independent group within subsect. Patellares in combined data tree. This result strongly suggested that they should be treated to series Pinmtae. RAPD analysis was very useful to clarify the interspecific relationships among the species of Korean Viola than ISSH and PCR-RFLP analyses.

한국산 제비꽃속 32분류군과 일본산 2집단 등 총 34집단에 대한 유연관계를 알아보기 위하여 RAPD(randomly amplified polymorphic DNA), ISSR(inter simple sequence repeat) 및 PCR-RFLP(restriction fragment length polymorphism) 분석을 실시하였다. RAPD 분석에서는 40개의 primer 중 6개가 분류군 전체에서 반응을 보였고 이로부터 총 70개(98.6%)의 다형화 밴드를 얻었으며, ISSR 분석에서는 4개의 primer로 부터 28개(96.6%)의 다형화밴드를 얻었다. 엽록체 DNA의 non-coding부분을 이용한 PCR-RFLP 분석에서는 반응이 일어난 4지역에서 증폭된 약 6.78 kb의 DNA 각각에 대하여 15가지 제한효소를 처리한 결과 총 80개의 restriction site를 얻었으며 그중 16 site는 polymorphic하게 나타나 20%의 다형화를 보였다. 본 연구에서 다룬 3가지 형질에 의한 유집분석 결과 각각의 형질에 의해서는 서로 일치하지 않는 유집형태를 보였지만 3가지 형질을 통합한 결과는 진정제비꽃절(sect. Nomimium)내 아절과 계열간 구분이 명확하게 나타났으며 무경종과 유경종도 구별이 가능하여 외부형태형질에 의한 기존의 분류체계와 일치하였다. 그러나 노랑제비꽃절(sect. Chamaemelanium)은 진정제비꽃절과 독립적인 군을 형성하지 않고 진정제비꽃절 내 무경종그룹인 Patellares아절과 Vaginatae아절 사이에 위치하여 나타났다. 형태적인 변이가 매우 심한 분류군으로 알려진 태백제비꽃군(V. albida complex)은 Patellares아절 내에서 하나의 군으로 유집되어 Pinnatae계열로 처리하는 것이 타당할 것으로 생각된다. 본 연구에서 사용한 3가지 형질 중 RAPD 분석방법은 ISSR과 PCR-RFLP 분석보다 제비꽃속의 종간 유연관계를 밝히는데 더 유용한 것으로 판단된다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국과학재단

References

  1. Anonymous. 1977. Flora Plantarum Herbacearum Chinae Boreali-Orientalis. Tomus 6. Sci. Publ. Pp. 79-129
  2. Ballard, H. E., Jr. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships and infrageneric groups in Viola (Violaceae) based on morphology, chromosome number, natural hybridization and Internal Transcribed Spacer(ITS) sequences. Ph.D. dissertation. Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison
  3. Ballard, H. E., Jr., M. D. Devine and K. J. Sytsma. 1997. Centrifugal allopatric speciation in the Viola canadensis complex (Violaceae) based on ITS DNA sequences. Amer. J. Bot.(supplement) 84: 177
  4. Ballard, H. E., Jr., K. Inoue and K. J. Sytsma. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships and biogeography of Japanese violets (Viola) based on ITS DNA sequences. Amer. J. Bot.(supplement) 85: 108
  5. Ballard, H. E., Jr., K. J. Sytsma and R. R. Kowal. 1999. Shrinking the violets: Phylogenetic relationships of infrageneric groups in Viola (Violaceae) based on ITS DNA sequences. Syst. Bot. 23: 439-458 https://doi.org/10.2307/2419376
  6. Ballard, H. E., Jr., K. J. Sytsma. 2000. Evolution and biogeography of the woody Hawaiian violets (Viola, Violaceae): Arctic origins, herbaceous ancestry, and bird dispersal. Evolution 54: 1521-1532 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00698.x
  7. Becker, W. 1925. Viola. In Engler, A. and K. Prantl, 2nd eds., 21 Bd. Die Naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Pp 363-377
  8. Brainerd, E. 1921. Violets of North America. Vt. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. p. 224
  9. Brainerd, E. 1924. Some natural violet hybrids of North America. Bull. Verm. Agr. Exp. Sta. 239: 1-205
  10. Choi, H. K and J. Wen. 2000. A phylogenetic analysis od Panax (Araliaceae): integrating cpDNA restriction site and nrDNA ITS sequence data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 224: 109-120 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985269
  11. Chung, T. H. 1959. A key of the species of Violaceae from Korea. J. Plant Biol. 2: 25-26
  12. Clausen, J. 1927. Chromosome number and the relationship of species in the genus Viola. Ann. Bot. 41: 677-714
  13. Clausen, J. 1929. Chromosome number and the relationship of some North American species of Viola. Ann. Bot. 43: 741-764
  14. Cortes-Palomec, A. and H. E. Ballard. 2002. Isolation mechanisms and gene flow between co-occurring species of Mexican Viola (Violaceae). 2002 Botany Conference, (abstracts) p. 57
  15. Cronquist, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York
  16. Demesure, B., N. Sodzi and R. J. Petit. 1995. A set of universal primers for amplification of polymorphic non-coding regions of mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA in plants. Molec. Ecol. 4: 129-131 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.1995.tb00201.x
  17. Doyle J. J. and J. S. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. 19 : 11-15
  18. Fritsch, P., M. A. Hanson, C. D. Spore, P. E. Pack and L. H. Reiseberg. 1993. Constancy of RAPD primer amplification strength among distantly related taxa of flowering plants. 11: 10-20 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02670555
  19. Gingins, F. 1823. Memoire sur la Famille des Violacees. Mem. Soc. Phy. His. Natur. Geneve. Paschoul, Geneva
  20. Hama, E. 1975. The wild violets of Japan in color. Sungmoondang, Tokyo
  21. Hashimoto, T. 1967. Violets of Japan. Sungmoondang, Tokyo
  22. Ishidoya, T. 1929. Review of Viola from Korean and Manshuria. Jour. Chosen Nat. Hist. Soc. 8: 15-17
  23. Kim, C. M. and W. J. Ko. 1980. Chemotaxonomic study on the genus Viola in Jeju Island. J. Plant Biol. 23: 85-90
  24. Lee, Y. N. 1967. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants in Korea(1). J. Kor. Res. Inst. 11: 455-478
  25. Lee, Y. N. 1969. Chromosome numbers of flowering plants in Korea (2). J. Kor. Res. Inst. B.L. 2: 141-145
  26. Maekawa, F. 1954. Violaceae. In Enumeratio Spermatophytarum Japonicum. III. Hara, H. (ed.), Iwanami, Tokyo, Pp. 194-227
  27. Maekawa, F. and T. Hashimoto. 1963. Violets of Japan : 2. Shibundo-shinko-sha, Tokyo, Pp. 1-9
  28. Makino, T. 1902. Observations on the Flora of Japan. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 16: 125-142 https://doi.org/10.15281/jplantres1887.16.184_125
  29. Melchior, H. 1925 Die Phylogenetische Entwicklung der Violaceen und die Naturlichen vervantschaftverhaltnisse ihrer gattungen. In Repertorium specierum novarum regni vegetabilis. Beitrage Zur systematik und pflanzengeographie, Vol. 2, Repertoriums, Fedde, F. (ed), Dahlem, Berlin, Pp. 83-125
  30. Messinger, W., K. Hummer and A. Liston. 1999. Ribes (Grossulariaceae) phylogeny as indicated by restriction-site polymorphisms of PCR-amplified chloroplast DNA. Pl. Syst. Evol. 217: 185-195 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984364
  31. Nadot, S., H. E. Ballard Jr, J. B. Creach and I. Dajoz. 2000. The evolution of pollen heteromorphism in Viola: a phylogenetic approach. Pl. System. Evol. 223: 155-171 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985276
  32. Nakai, T. 1909. Flora Koreana I. J. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ. Tokyo 26: 62-74
  33. Nakai, T. 1911. Flora KoreanaⅡ. J. Coll. Sci. Imp. Univ. Tokyo 31: 445-447
  34. Nakai, T. 1916. Viola coreanae. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 30: 276-289
  35. Nakai, T. 1922a. Violae Novae Japonicae. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 34: 29-39
  36. Nakai, T. 1922b. Notes on Viola. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 36: 52-61, 84-93, 118-121 https://doi.org/10.15281/jplantres1887.36.422_25
  37. Nakai, T. 1925. Notes sur les Violettes du Japan. Bull. Soc. Bot. (France) 73: 180-195
  38. Nakai, T. 1928. Violae ad Floram Japonicum Novae. Bot. Mag. (Tokyo) 42: 556-566 https://doi.org/10.15281/jplantres1887.42.556
  39. Nakai, T. 1952. A synoptical sketch of Korean Flora. Bull. Nat. Sci. Mus. 31: 1-152
  40. Palibin, J. 1899. Conspectus Florae Koreae I. Acta Horti. Petrop. 17: 30-36
  41. Potokina, E., N. Tomooka, D. A. Vaughan, T. Alexandrova and R. -Q. Xu. 1999. Phylogeny of Vicia subgenus Vicia (Fabaceae) based on analysis of RAPDs and RFLP of PCR-amplified chloroplast genes. Genet. Resources Crop Evol. 46: 149-161 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008640322198
  42. Russell, N. H. 1958a. The violets of Minnesota. Proc. Minnesota Acad. Sci. 25-26: 126-191
  43. Russell, N. 1958b. The violets of the Tennessee I. Key to the species and distribution maps. Castanea 23: 63-76
  44. Russell, N. 1958c. The nature of Viola missouriensis Greene. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci. 654: 96-101
  45. Russell, N. 1960. Studies in the photoperiodic responses of violets (Viola). The Southwestern Naturalist 5: 177-186 https://doi.org/10.2307/3668940
  46. Russell, N. 1965. Violets (Viola) of central and eastern United States: An introductory survey. SIDA 2: 1-113
  47. Russell, N. and A. C. Risser. 1960. The hybrid nature of Viola emarginata. Brittonia 12: 298-305 https://doi.org/10.2307/2805122
  48. Satake, Y. and E. Ito. 1965. Taxonomic study of the Japanese Viola 2. Chasmogamous flower of the stemless group. Bull. Natl. Sci. Mus., Tokyo 8: 119-237
  49. Satake, Y. and E. Ito. 1966a. Taxonomic study of the Japanese Viola 3. Chasmogamous flower of the caulescent group. Bull. Natl. Sci. Mus., Tokyo 9: 247-256
  50. Satake, Y. and E. Ito. 1966b. Taxonomic study of the Japanese Viola 4. Chasmogamous flower of the caulescent group. Bull. Natl. Sci. Mus., Tokyo 9: 437-455
  51. Takenouchi, M. 1955. Brief notes on the taxonomy, ecology and geographic distribution of species of Viola indigenous to Manchuria and Inner-Mongolia. Sci. Contr. Tung-pei Teach. Univ. 5: 65-95
  52. Valentine, D. H., H. Merxm?ller and A. Schmidt. 1968. Violaceae. In Florae Europea II. Thulin, T. G., V. H., Heywood, N. A. Burgers, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walter and D. A. Webb (ed.), Cambridge, Pp. 270-282
  53. Wang, C. 1991. Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. Science Press, 51: 1-148
  54. Wang, Z., J. L. Weber, G. Zhong and S. D. Tanksley. 1994. Survey of plant short tandem DNA repeats. Theor. Appl. Genet. 88: 1-6
  55. Williams, J. G. K., A. R. K. Kubelik, J. A. Rafalski and S. V. Tingey. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucl. Acids Res. 18: 6531-6535 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/18.22.6531
  56. Williams, J. G. K., M. K. Hanafey, J. A. Rafalski and S. V. Tingey. 1993. Genetic analysis using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Meth. Enzymol. 218:704-740 https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(93)18053-F
  57. Yoo, K. O., K. J. Malla and J. Wen. 2001. Chloroplast DNA variation of Panax (Araliaceae) in Nepal and its taxonomic implications. Brittonia 53: 447-453 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02809800
  58. Yuzepchuk, S. V. 1949. Violaceae. In Flora of the URSS. Shishkin, B. K. and E. G. Bobrov (eds.), Vol. XV. Leningrad Pp. 262-360
  59. Zietkiewicz, E., A. Rafalski and D. Labuda. 1994. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20: 176-183 https://doi.org/10.1006/geno.1994.1151
  60. 김경식. 1986. 한국산 제비꽃속 식물의 비교형태학적 연구. 성균관대학교 박사학위논문. 수원
  61. 김경식, 선병윤, 황성수, 정국현. 1991. 한국산 제비꽃속의 종분화론적 연구-태백제비꽃군의 비교형태학적 연구. 식물학회지 34: 229-238
  62. 박만규. 1974. 한국쌍자엽식물지. 정음사, 서울. Pp. 272-279
  63. 이우철, 육창수. 1972. 금강제비꽃 잎의 flavonoid 배당체에 대하여. 식물분류학회지 5: 43-45
  64. 이우철, 육창수. 1975. 한국산 제비꽃속의 성분에 의한 분류. 식물분류학회지 6: 1-7
  65. 이영로, 이우철. 1968. 제비꽃속 식물의 잎표피와 종자의 형태학적 연구. 생활과학논문집 1: 35-39
  66. 이창복. 1969. 우리나라의 식물자원. 서울대논문집, 농생계. 20: 158-159
  67. 정태현, 도봉섭, 심학진. 1949. 조선식물명집 I. 초본편. 조선생물학회편. Pp. 85-88
  68. 황성수. 2002. 한국산 제비꽃속 노랑제비꽃절의 분류학적 연구-형태학적 형질을 중심으로. 식물분류학회지 32: 397-416
  69. 황성수, 김경식. 1985. 제비꽃속 화분의 형태학적 연구. 전북대 기초과학연구소 논문집 8: 53-59