IE interfaces (산업공학)

Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers (대한산업공학회)
권호 표지

A Study on Deciding Priority of Optimal Design Guide for Disassembly Process

분리공정 개선을 위한 설계 가이드 우선순위 결정방법론

  • Mok, Hak-Soo (Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Sung (Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University) ;
  • Cho, Jong-Rae (Dept. of Industrial Engineering, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2004.01.17
  • Accepted : 2004.10.14
  • Published : 2004.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study presents the decision of priority for optimal design guide to improve disassembly process. Disassembly process is divided into recognition, transfer and disassembly of assembly point and recognition, transfer and remove of grasp point. Significant influential factors are derived from analyzing the above process. And those factors are used for making the check list to evaluate the properties of parts in each process. Furthermore, the weight with considering disassembly process is also used to determine weight of each process. On the base of the above sequence, qualitative score of disassemblability of each process that is enabled to compare different disassembly processes can be acquired. Ultimately the score helps to decide the priority of design guide for disassembly process.

Keywords

References

  1. Herbert, F.(1995), Recycling Handbook, McGraw-Hill
  2. Mok, H. S, Moon, K. S,Park, H. S, Sung, J. H, Choi, H.W(2003), Determination of Design Parameters for Automobile Parts Recycling, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 20(1), 159-157
  3. Saaty, T., Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Management Science, 32(7), 841-855
  4. Mok, H. S,Park, H. S, Moon, K. S,Cho, J. R(2002), Development of disassembly and recycling technology of automobile parts for environment, Korea Science and Engineering Foundation
  5. Mok, H. S, Moon, K. S, Kim, S. H, Moon, D. S (1999), THe Complexity Evaluation System of Automobile Subassembly for Recycling, Journal of the Korean Society of Precision Engineering 16(5), 101-114
  6. Cho, G, T (2002), Aggregation of Multiple Evaluator's Weights in Applying the AHP to Evaluate Technology Alternatives, Management Science, 19(2), 139-153
  7. Kim, S. C, Eo, H. J (1994), Priority Aggregation for AHP based Experts Opinions, Korean Operation Research and Management Science, 19(3), 41-51
  8. Yun, J. G. (1996) Application effects and limitations of AHP as a research methodology-A Comparison of 3 statistical technique for evaluation MIX success factor, Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society, 21(3), 109-125
  9. Harker, P. (1987), The Theory of Ratio Scale Estimation: Saaty's Analytic Hierarchy Process, Management Science, 33(11), 1383-1402
  10. Mok, H. S, Moon,K. S, Cho, J, R, Sung, J. H. (2002),Development of DFD for recycling, Hyundai-motor