The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

MACRO-SHEAR BOND STRENGTH AND MICRO-SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF CEROMER BONDED TO METAL ALLOY AND FIBER REINFORCED COMPOSITE

  • Park Hyung-Yoon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Kangnung National University) ;
  • Cho Lee-Ra (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Kangnung National University) ;
  • Cho Kyung-Mo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Kangnung National University) ;
  • Park Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry and Research Institute of Oral Science, Kangnung National University)
  • Published : 2004.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statement of problem. According to the fracture pattern in several reports, fractures most frequently occur in the interface between the ceromer and the substructure. Purpose. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the macro shear bond strength and microshear bond strength of a ceromer bonded to a fiber reinforced composite (FRC) as well as metal alloys. Material and methods. Ten of the following substructures, type II gold alloy, Co-Cr alloy, Ni-Cr alloy, and FRC (Vectris) substructures with a 12 mm in diameter, were imbedded in acrylic resin and ground with 400, and 1, 000-grit sandpaper. The metal primer and wetting agent were applied to the sandblasted bonding area of the metal specimens and the FRC specimens, respectively. The ceromer was placed onto a 6 mm diameter and 3 mm height mold in the macro-shear test and 1 mm diameter and 2 mm height mold in the micro-shear test, and then polymerized. The macro- and micro-shear bond strength were measured using a universal testing machine and a micro-shear tester, respectively. The macro- and micro-shear strength were analyzed with ANOVA and a post-hoc Scheffe adjustment ($\alpha$ = .05). The fracture surfaces of the crowns were then examined by scanning electron microscopy to determine the mode of failure. Chi-square test was used to identify the differences in the failure mode. Results. The macro-shear strength and the micro-shear strength differed significantly with the types of substructure (P<.001). Although the ceromer/FRC group showed the highest macroand micro-shear strength, the micro-shear strength was not significantly different from that of the base metal alloy groups. The base metal alloy substructure groups showed the lowest mean macro-shear strength. However, the gold alloy substructure group exhibited the least micro-shear strength. The micro-shear strength was higher than the macro-shear strength excluding the gold alloy substructure group. Adhesive failure was most frequent type of fracture in the ceromer specimens bonded to the gold alloys. Cohesive failure at the ceromer layer was more common in the base metals and FRC substructures. Conclusion. The Vectris substructure had higher shear strength than the other substructures. Although the shear strength of the ceromer bonded to the base metals was lower than that of the gold alloy, the micro-shear strength of the base metals were superior to that of the gold alloy.

Keywords

References

  1. Touati B, Aidan N. Second generation laboratory composite resin for indirect restorations. J Esthet Dent 1997;9:108-18 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1997.tb00928.x
  2. Gohring TN, Mormann WH, Lutz F. Clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of fiber reinforced inlay fixed partial dentures: Preliminary results after one year. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:662-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70007-7
  3. Altieri JV, Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ, Patel AP. Longitudinal clinical evaluation of fiber-rein-forced composite fixed partial dentures: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:16-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90249-6
  4. Krejci I, Boretti R, Lutz F, Giezendanner P. Adhesive crowns and fixed partial dentures of optimized composite resin with glass fiber-bonded framework. Quint Dent Tech 1999;22:107-27
  5. Choi NJ, Vang MS.The effects of metal surface treat-ment on bond strength between resin and metal in-terface of resin veneerd crown. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1994;34:471-83
  6. Martin J, LeBeau S. The best of both worlds: combining metal and ceromer for clinical success. Dent Today 2000;19:88-9
  7. Almilhatti HJ, Giampaolo ET, Vergani CE, Machado AL, Pavarina AC. Shear bond strength of aesthetic materials bonded to Ni-Cr alloy. J Dent 2003;31:205-11 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(03)00012-5
  8. Freilich MA, Meiers JC, Duncan JP, Eckrote KA, Goldberg AJ. Clinical evaluation of fiber-rein-forced fixed bridges. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133:1524-34 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2002.0084
  9. Monaco C, Ferrari M, Miceli GP, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite inlay FPDs. Int J Prothodon 2003;16:319-325
  10. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Handel G. Fiber-reinforced composite crowns and FPDs: a clinical report. Int J Prothodont 2003;16;239-43
  11. Cesar PF, Meyer Faara PM, Miwa Caldart R, Gastaldoni Jaeger R, da Cunha Ribeiro F. Tensile bond strength of composite repairs on artglass using different surface treatments. Am J Dent 2001;14:373-7
  12. Craig RG.. Powers J M. Restorative dental materials. 11th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby 2002 54-71
  13. Nakamura T, Waki T, Kinuta S, Tanaka H. Strength and elastic modulus of fiber-reinforced composite used for fabrication FPDs. Int J Prothodont 2003;16:549-53
  14. Chang JC, Koh SH, Powers JM, Duong JH. Tensile bond strength of composite to gold-palladium alloy after thermal cycling. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:271-6 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.121583
  15. Rothfuss LG, Hokett SD, Hondrum SO, Elrod CW. Resin to metal bond strength using two commercial systems. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:270-2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70236-7
  16. Czerw RJ, Wakefield CW, Robbins JW, Fulkerson MS. Shear bond strength of composite resin to microetched metal with five newer-generation bonding agent. Oper Dent 1995;20:58-62
  17. Smith RM, Barrett MG, Gardner WA, Marshall T, Mclean MJ, McMichael DW, Yerbury PJ,Rawls HR. Effect of environmental stress and surface treatment on resin-to-metal bonding. Am J Dent 1993;6:111-5
  18. Kim JY, Pfeiffer P, Niedermeier W. Effect of laboratory procedures and thermocycling on the shear bond strength of resin metal bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:184-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00261-0
  19. Pesun S, Mazurat RD. Bond strength of acrylic resin to cobalt-ehromium alloy treated with the Silicoater MD and Kevloc systems. J Can Dent Assoc 1998; 64:798-802
  20. Yoon DJ, Shin SW, Lim HN, Suh KW. A study of the bond strength of reinforced indirect composite resins to dental alloys.J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1999;37:620-39
  21. McDonough WG, Antonucci JM, He J, Shimada Y, Chiang MY, Schumacher GE, Schultheisz CR. A microshear test to measure bond strengths of dentin polymer interfaces. Biomaterials 2002;23:3603-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00089-3
  22. Tantbirojn D, Cheng YS, Versluis A, Hodges JS, Douglas WH. Nominal shear or fracture mechanics in the assessment of composite-dentin adhesion? J Dent Res 2000;79:41-48
  23. Laufer B, Nicholls J, Townsend J. SiOx-C coating: A composit-to-metal bonding mechanism. J Prothet Dent 1988;60:320-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90277-6
  24. Rubo JH, Pegoraro LF, Ferreira PM. A comparison of tensile bond strengths of resin-retained prostheses made using five alloys. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:277-81
  25. Cho L, Song H, Koak J, Heo S. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceromer/fiber-reinforced composite crowns: effect of variations in preparation design. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:388-95 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.128378
  26. Song HY, Yi YJ, Cho LR, Park DY. Effects of two preparation designs and pontic distance on bend-ing and fracture strength of fiber-reinforced composite inlay fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:347-53 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(03)00434-7
  27. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990;69:1652-8 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690100501
  28. Lastumaki TM, Kallio TT, Vallittu PK. The bond strength of light curing composite resin to finally polymerized and aged glass fiber-reinforced composite substrate. Biomaterials 2002;23:4533-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00197-7