The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

FRACTURE STRENGTHS OF CEROMER CROWNS SUPPORTED ON THE VARIOUS ABUTMENT CORE MATERIALS

  • Kim Young-Oh (Department of Prosthodontics, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Ku Chul-Whoi (Department of Prosthodontics, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park Young-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Yang Hong-So (Department of Prosthodontics, Chonnam National University)
  • Published : 2004.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statement of problem. The effects of various core buildup materials which differs in the mechanical properties on the fracture strength of metal-free crowns is unknown. Purpose. This study was carried out to evaluate the fracture strengths of Artglass ceromer crowns supported by 3 different core materials in clinically simulated anterior tooth preparation. Material and methods. Ten crowns from each group were constructed to comparable dimensions on the various dies made by gold alloy, Ni-Cr alloy, and composite resin. The ten crowns were then cemented onto the dies and loaded until catastrophic failure took place. Fracture resistance to forces applied to the incisal edges of the anterior crowns supported by three types of dies was tested. Results. The ceromer crowns on the composite resin dies fractured at significantly lower values(287.7 N) than the ceromer crowns on the metal dies(approximately 518.4 N). No significant difference was found between the fracture values of the ceromer crowns on the dies of gold alloy and Ni-Cr alloy. Conclusion. The failure loads of the ceromer crowns on the metal dies were almost the same and not affected by the differences of casting alloys. However, the fracture values of the ceromer crowns on the resin dies were significantly reduced by the relative weak properties of composite resin core material.

Keywords

References

  1. Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:318-26 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70276-3
  2. Freilich MA, Karmaker AC, Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ. Development and clinical applications of a light-polymerized fiber-reinforced composite. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:311-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70131-3
  3. Freiberg RS,Ferrance JL. Evaluation of cure, properties and wear resistance of Artglass dental composite. Am J Dent 1998;11:214-8
  4. Beschnidt SM, Strub JR. Evaluation of the marginal accuracy of different all-ceramic crown systems after simulation in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:582-93. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00449.x
  5. Yoshinari M, Derand T. Fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. lnt J prosthodont 1994;7:329-38
  6. Scherrer SS, de Rijk WG. The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:462-7
  7. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:280-301 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70128-3
  8. Tsai YL, Petsche PE, Anusavice KJ, Yang MC. Influence of glass-ceramic thickness on Hertzian and bulk fracture mechanisms. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:27-32
  9. Dong JK, Oh SC, Kim SD. Fracture strength of the IPS Empress crown: the effect of occlusal depth and axial inclination on upper first premolar crowns. J Kor Acad Prosthodont 1999;37:127-33
  10. Campbell SD. A comparative strength study of metal ceramic and all-ceramic esthetic materials: modulus of rupture. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:476-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90184-4
  11. Sarafianou A, Kafandaris NM. Effect of convergence angle on retention of resin-bonded retainers cemented with resinous cements. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:475-81.7
  12. Gateau P, Sabek M, Dailey B. Fatigue testing and microscopic evaluation of post and core restorations under artificial crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:341-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70090-9
  13. McLaren EA, White SN. Survival of In-Ceram crowns in a private practice: a prospective clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:216-22 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80015-3
  14. Sjogren G, Lantto R, Tillberg A. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns (Dicor) in general practice. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:277-84 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70269-6
  15. Erpenstein H, Borchard R, Kerschbaum T. Longterm clinical results of galvano-ceramic and glassceramic individual crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:530-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70010-2
  16. Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure test-ing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:652-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70103-4
  17. Castellani D, Baccetti T, Giovannoni A, Bernardini UD. Resistance to fracture of metal ceramic and all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:149-54
  18. Bernal G, Jones RM, Brown DT, Munoz CA, Goodacre CJ. The effect of finish line form and luting agent on the breaking strength of Dicor crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:286-90
  19. Burke FJ. Maximising the fracture resistance of dentine- bonded all-ceramic crowns. J Dent 1999;27:169-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00050-5
  20. Fan P, Nicholls JI, Kois JC. Load fatigue of five restoration modalities in structurally compromised premolars. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:213-20
  21. Wiskott HW, Krebs C, Scherrer SS, Botsis J, Belser UC. Compressive and tensile zones in the cement interface of full crowns: a technical note on the concept of resistance. J Prosthodont 1999;8:80-91 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1999.tb00016.x
  22. Bonilla ED, Mardirossian G, Caputo AA. Fracture toughness of various core build-up materials. J Prosthodont 2000;9:14-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2000.00014.x
  23. Burke FJ. The effect of variations in bonding procedure on fracture resistance of dentin-bonded all-ceramic crowns. Quintessence Int 1995;26:293-300
  24. Rosenstiel SF, Gupta PK, Van der Sluys RA, Zimmerman MH. Strength of a dental glass-ceramic after surface coating. Dent Mater 1993;9:274-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90074-Z
  25. Kiliaridis S, Kjellberg X, Wenneberg B, Engstrom C. The relationship between maximal bite forces, bite force endurance, and facial morphology during growth. A cross-sectional study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:323-31 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040583
  26. Waltimo A, Kononen M. A novel bite force recorder and maximal isometric bite force values for healthy young adults. Scand J Dent Res 1993;101:1711-5
  27. Gibbs CH, Mahan PE, Lundeen HC, Brehnan K, Walsh EK, Holbrook WB. Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transansmission. J Prosthet Dent 1981;46:443-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90455-8