한국지구과학회지 (Journal of the Korean earth science society)

  • 제25권7호
  • /
  • Pages.507-518
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 1225-6692(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-4518(eISSN)
한국지구과학회 (The Korean Earth Science Society)
권호 표지

중등학교 과학실험수업의 탐구수준을 평가하기 위한 도구 개발 및 적용

Development and Application of an Instrument for Assessing Inquiry Level in Secondary School Science Laboratory Classrooms

  • 발행 : 2004.10.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 중등학교에서의 실험수업을 평가하기 위한 도구를 개발하고 이를 적용하는 것이다. Dana(2001)가 개발한 상황적 실험활동도구를 수정, 보완하여 ‘실험수업의 탐구수준을 평가하기 위한 도구’를 만들었다. 타당도를 확보하기 위하여 전문가들과 여러 차례의 협의를 거쳤으며, 15명의 과학교육 전공 대학원생들에게 의뢰하여 타당도를 검증하였다. 신뢰도를 높이기 위하여 연구자와 평가자 2인이 3개의 전사된 수업을 읽고 난 후, 함께 녹화된 실험 수업을 보여 수준을 달리 하였을 때 도구의 내용을 수정하는 방법으로 신뢰도를 확보하였다. 이렇게 만들어진 평가도구를 4명의 중학교 초임과학교사의 수업에 적용하였다. 그 결과 개발된 평가도구는 중등학교의 실험수업 탐구수준을 결정하는데 좋은 도구라는 것을 확인하였다. 본 연구에 참여한 중학교 초임과학교사의 탐구수준은 확인수준과 구조화된 탐구주준인 것으로 나타났다.

The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an instrument for analysing secondary school science laboratory classroom. Three classroom of novice teachers were observed and administered Dana's (2001) situated laboratory activity instrument. Dana's situated laboratory activity instrument consists of eight categories. Each category includes four levels. Three doctoral students and two science education specialists participated in modification of the through 15 science education graduate students. To achieve reliability, the researcher and two raters observed and analyzed three videotaped classrooms through discussion. The finalized instrument was employed in four novice teacher' classes and result indicated the instrument to be useful in identifying the inquiry level of a secondary laboratory classroom. The inquiry level of four novice teachers was confirmation or observation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김영신, 2003, 예비 과학 교사가 탐구 점수표에 따라 분석한 현장 과학 수업. 한국과학교육학회지, 23 (5), 561-573
  2. 송용의, 2002, 효율적인 교사의 발문기법. 배영사, 서울, 160 p
  3. Bate, G.C., 1978, The role of the laboratory in secondary school science programs. In M.Budd Rowe (ed.), What Research Says to the Science Teacher, 55-82 p
  4. Colburn, A., 1997, How to make lab activities more open ended. CSTA Journal, Fall 1997, 4-6
  5. Dana, L., 2001, The effects of the level of inquiry of situated secondary science laboratory activities on students' understanding of concepts and the nature of science, ability to use process skills and attitudes toward problem solving. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 204 p
  6. Germann, P.J., Haskins, S., and Auls, S., 1996, Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: promoting scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33 (5), 475-99 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199605)33:5<475::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-O
  7. Herron, 1971, The nature of scientific inquiry. School Review, 68 (1), 17-29
  8. Lawson, A.E., 1995, Science teaching and the development of thinking. Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, 206-208 p
  9. Luft, J.A., 1999, Assessing science teachers as they implement inquiry lessons: the extended inquiry observational rubric. Science educator, 8 (1), 9-18
  10. McComas, W.F., 1997, The nature of the laboratory experience: a guide for describing, classifying and enhancing hands-on activities. CSTA Journal, 6-9
  11. McIntosh, T.C., 1995, Problem-solving practice. The Science Teacher, 62 (6), 48-50
  12. National Research Council, 1996, National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1-9 p
  13. Pella, M., 1961, The laboratory and science thinking. The science Teacher, 28 (5), 29-31
  14. Pizzini, E,L., Shepardson, D.P., and Abell, S.K., 1991, The inquiry level of junior high activities: Implications to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28 (2), 111-121 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280203
  15. Priestely, W.J., Priestley, H.D., Schumuckler, J.S., Hiosky, A., Sutman, F., and Wang, M., 1997, Science laboratory instruction: Summary of findings and implications from four companion studies, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago, IL
  16. Schwab, J.J.., 1962, TIle teaching of science as inquiry, In J.J.. Schwab & P.F. Brandwein, TIle teaching of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
  17. Shepardson, D.P., 1997, The nature of student thinking in life science laboratories. School Science and Mathematics, 97 (l), 37-44 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17338.x
  18. Tafoya, E., Sunal, D.W., and Knecht, P., 1980, Assessing inquiry potential: A tool for curriculum decision makers. School Science and Mathematics, 89 (1), 43-48
  19. Welch, W., Klopfer, L., Aikenhead, G. and Robinson, J., 1981, The role of inquiry in science education: analysis and recommendations. Science Education, 65, 33-50 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730650106