DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of Roller Speed on Magnetic Properties and Structures of α-Fe/Nd2Fe14B Nanocomposite Magnets Prepared by Melt-spinning

  • Pei, Wenli (School of Materials and Metallurgy, Northeastern University) ;
  • Lian, Fazeng (School of Materials and Metallurgy, Northeastern University) ;
  • Fu, Meng (School of Materials and Metallurgy, Northeastern University) ;
  • Zhou, Guiqin (School of Materials and Metallurgy, Northeastern University) ;
  • Takahashi, M. (Department of Electronic Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Tohoku University)
  • Published : 2004.12.01

Abstract

The crystallization behaviours of nanocomposite made by a function of quenching rate (roller speed) were studied. The results showed that there was one step c$\mathbb{r}$ystallization process for the alloy quenched at roller speed of 32 m/s, which could be shown as, Am (amorphouse) + ${\alpha}-Fe/Nd_2Fe_{14}B$ ${\rightarrow}$ ${\alpha}-Fe/Nd_2Fe_{14}B$ . For the alloy quenched at roller speed of 40 m/s, there was steps crystallization process taking place at different temperatures, which could be shown as, Am ${\rightarrow}$ ${\alpha}-Fe/Nd_2Fe_{23}B_3+Nd_2Fe_{14}B+Am`$ ${\rightarrow}$ ${\alpha}-Fe/Nd_2Fe_{14}B$. The presence of transition phase ($Nd_2Fe_{23}B_3$) was harmful to get fine and uniform grain size during crystallization process. Uniform microstructures and high magnetic properties could be attained for the as-quenched alloy containing less amorphous phase and no presence of transition phase during annealing treatment. For the alloy prepared at roller speed of 32 m/s, the following properties were obtained, $B_r= 0.904 T,_iH_c = 801 kA/m, (BH)_{max} = 122 kJ/m^3 and M_r/M_s = 0.6$.

Keywords

References

  1. R. Coehoorn, D. B. Mooij de, and C. Waard de, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 80, 101 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(89)90333-8
  2. E. F. Kneller, and R. Hawing, IEEE. Trans. Magn. 27, 3588 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1109/20.102931
  3. R. Skomsk, and T. M. D. Coey, Phys. Rev. B 48, 15812 (1993)
  4. A. Manaf, R. A. Buckley, and H. A. Davies, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 128,302 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(93)90475-H
  5. E. C. Stoner and E. P. Wohlfarth, Phys. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A. 240, 599 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1948.0007
  6. L. Withanawasam, G. C. Hadjipanayis, and R. F. Krause, J. Appl. Phys. 75, 6646 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.356882
  7. W. Gong, G. C. Hadjipanayis, and R. F. Krause, J. Appl. Phys. 75, 6649 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.356883
  8. X. K. Sun, J. Zhang, Y. L. Chu, W. Liu, B. Z. Chui, and Z. D. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1740 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.123673
  9. R. Fischer, T. Schrefl, H. Kronmuller, and J. Fidler, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 150,329 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(95)00298-7