DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

하악대구치 근심치근의 협설측 근관장의 비교

A COMPARISON OF THE LENGTH BETWEEN MESIO-BUCCAL AND MESIO-LINGUAL CANALS OF THE MANDIBULAR MOLAR

  • 박슬희 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 노봉환 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 황호길 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Park Seul-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Noh Bong-Hwan (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Hwang Ho-Keel (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 발행 : 2004.11.01

초록

The aim of this study was to compare the initial apical file (IAF) length between the mesio-buccanl and mesio-lingual canals of the mandibular molar before and after early coronal flaring. Fifty mandibular molars with complete apical formation and patent foramens were selected. After establishing the initial working length of the buccal and lingual canal of the mesial root using the Root-ZX, radiographs were taken for the working length with a 0.5 mm short of #15 K-file tip just visible at the foramen under a surgical microscope (OPMI 1-FC, Carl Zeiss Co. Germany) at 25X. After early coronal flaring using the $K^3$ file, additional radiographs were taken using the same procedure. The root canal morphology and the difference in working length between the buccal and lingual canals were evaluated. These results show that the difference in the length between the mesio-buccal and mesio-lingual canals of the mandibular molar was $\leq$ 0.5 mm. If one canal has a correct working length for the mesial root of the mandibular molar, it can be used effectively for measuring the working length of another canal when the files are superimposed or loosening. In addition, the measured the working length after early coronal flaring is much more reasonable because the difference in the length between the mesio-buccal and mesio-lingual canals can be reduced.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 임성삼. 임상근관치료학. 제2판. 의치학사, 서울. p122-127, 1999
  2. Ingle J, Bakland L. Endodontics. 3th ed.. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, p36-37, 1985
  3. Kuttler Y. Microcopic investigation of root apexes. J Am Dent Assoc 50:544-552, 1955
  4. Altman M et al. Apical root anatomy of human maxillary central incisors. Oral Surg 30:694-699, 1970 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(70)90396-8
  5. Burch JG, Hulen S. The relationship of the apical foramen to the anatomic apex of the tooth root. Oral Surg 34:262-267, 1972 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(72)90418-5
  6. Burch JG, Hulen S. The relationship of the apical foramen to the anatomic apex of the tooth root. Oral Surg 34:262-268, 1972 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(72)90418-5
  7. Green D. A stereomicroscopic study of the root apices of 400 maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth, Oral Surg 9 : 1224-1232, 1956 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(56)90192-X
  8. Green D. Stereomicroscopic study of 700 root apices of maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth, Oral Surg 13:728-733, 1960 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(60)90373-X
  9. Gutierrez JH et al. Apical foraminal openings in human teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Patho 79:769-777, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(05)80315-4
  10. Morfis A et al. Study of the apices of human permanent teeth with the use of a scanning electron microscope, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Patho 77:172-176, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(94)90281-X
  11. Goldmann M et al. Reliability of radiographic interpretations. Oral Surg 38:287-293, 1974 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(74)90070-X
  12. Cohen S, Burns R. Pathways of the pulp. 7th ed., St Louis: CV Mosby, p248-251, 1988
  13. Wheeler RC. Dental Anatomy, Physiology and Occlusion. 5th. ed., W,B, Saunders Co., p267-297, 1974
  14. Grossman L. Endodontic practice. 11th ed., Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, p169-173, 1988
  15. Ingle JI, Bakland LK. Endodontics, 5th ed., Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger, p462-469, 2002
  16. Cohen S, Burns R. Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed.. St Louis: CV Mosby, p210-217, 2002
  17. Weine FS. Endodontic therapy, 3rd ed., St. Louis:Mosby Co.. p209, 1982
  18. Woelfel JG, Scheid RC. Dental Anatomy. 1st ed., Philadelphia, Williams & Wilkins, p97-107, 2002
  19. Pineda F, Kuttler Y. Mesiodistal and buccolingual roentgenographic investigation of 7,275 root canals. Oral Surg 33: 101-110, 1972 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(72)90214-9
  20. Green D. Brooklyn NY. Double canals in single roots Oral Surg 35:689-696, 1973 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(73)90037-6
  21. Vertucci FJ, Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth, Oral Surg 58:589-599, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(84)90085-9
  22. Blayney JR. Some factors in root canal treatment. J Dent Res 11:840, 1924
  23. Groove CJ, Faculty technic in investigations of the apices of pulpless teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 13:746. 1926
  24. Katz A et al. Tooth length determination: A review Oral Surg 72:238-242, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(91)90169-D
  25. Kobayashi C. Suda H. New Electronic canal length measuring device on the ratio method. J Endod 20:111-114, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80053-1
  26. Cohen S, Burns R. Pathways of the pulp, 6th ed., St. Louis:CV Mosby, p179-218, 1994
  27. 황호길, 신영근, 김평식 근관내 여러 가지 조건에 따른 Root-ZX의 정확도에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 25:474-481, 2000
  28. Hulsmann M et al. An improved technique for the evaluation of root canal preparation. J Endod 25: 599-602, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80316-1
  29. 황호길, 신영근. The effectiveness of obturating techniques in sealing isthmuses. 대한치과보존학회지 26:499-506, 2001

피인용 문헌

  1. Study of endodontic working length of Korean posterior teeth vol.35, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.6.429