DETECTION OF INTERFACIAL CRACK LENGTH BY USING ULTRASONIC ATTENUATION COEFFICIENTS ON ADHESIVELY BONDED JOINTS

  • Chung, N.Y. (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Soongsil University) ;
  • Park, S.I. (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School, Soongsil University)
  • Published : 2004.12.01

Abstract

In this paper, an interfacial crack length has been detected by using the ultrasonic attenuation coefficient on the adhesively bonded double-cantilever beam (DCB) joints. The correlations between energy release rates which were investigated by experimental measurement, the boundary element method (BEM) and Ripling's equation are compared with each other. The experimental results show that the interfacial crack length for the ultrasonic attenuation coefficient and energy release rate increases proportionally. From the experimental results, we propose a method to detect the interfacial crack length by using the ultrasonic attenuation coefficient and discuss it.

Keywords

References

  1. Biwa, S. and Watanabe, Y (2003). Analysis of waveattenuation in unidirectional viscoelastic composites by adifferential scheme, Composite Science and Technology,63,237-247 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00202-6
  2. Castings, M. and Hosten, B. (2001). Lamb and SH waves generated and detected by air-coupled ultrasonic transducers in composite material plates. NDT&E International, 34, 249-258
  3. Chung, N. Y, Park, S. I. and Lee, M. D. (2001). Detection ofinterface crack using ultrasonic method in adhesivelybonded joint. Transactions of the KSME 25, 3, 415-423
  4. Chung, N. Y., Park, S. I., Lee, M. D. and Park, C. H. (2002).Ultrasonic detection of interface crack in adhesivelybonded DCB joints, Int. J. Automotive Technology 3, 4,157-163
  5. Derouiche, Z. and Dlebarre, C. (1996). Ultrasonic characterization of heterogeneous materials using a stochastic approach. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 4, 2304-2315 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.411955
  6. Jeong, H. D. and Shin, H. J. (1998). Detection of defectsin a thin steel plate using ultrasonic guided wave. J.KSNT 18,6, 445-453
  7. Kishore, N. N. and Sridhar, I. (2000). Finite elementmodelling of the scattering of ultrasonic waves byisolated flaws. NDT&E International, 33, 297-305 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(99)00054-7
  8. Kline, R. A. (1983). Measurement of attenuation anddispersion using an ultrasonic spectroscopy technique.J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 76, 2,498-504 https://doi.org/10.1121/1.391591
  9. Kline, R. A. and Hsiao, C. P. (1986). Nondestructive evaluation of adhesively bonded joint. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 18, 214-217
  10. Moriyama, S. and Kimura, K. (1998). Effect of surfaceroughness on sensitivity of ultrasonic normal beamtesting. J. JSNT47, 5, 315-321
  11. Pecorari, C. (2000). Attenuation and dispersion of rayleighwaves propagation on a crack surface: An effectivefield approach, Ultrasonic, 38, 754-760 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-624X(99)00223-1
  12. Ping, H. (2001). Acoustic dispersion and attenuationmeasurement using both transmitted and reflectedpulses. Ultrasonics, 39, 27-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-624X(00)00037-8
  13. Rippling, E. J., Mostovosy, S. and Patrick, R. L. (1964).Measuring fracture toughness of adhesive joints.Materials Research Standard, 14, 129-134
  14. Si-Chaib, M. O., Djelouah, H. and Bocquet, M. (2000).Application of ultrasonic reflection mode conversiontransducers in NDE. NDT&E International, 33,91-99 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(99)00027-4
  15. Song, S. J., Choe, J. U. and Kim, H. J. (1998). A Study onelastic wave propagation for nondestructive evaluationof composite structures-An experimental approach.Transaction of the KSME 22, 6, 978-989
  16. Xu, W. J. and Ourak, M. (1997). Angular measurement of acoustic reflection coefficient for substrate materials and layered structures by V(Z) technique. NDT&E International, 30, 75-83